Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Oil Spill Fallout: Oyster Industry Takes Hit as Gulf Company Shuts Doors

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Louisiana's oyster industry took another major hit as the AmeriPure Processing Co. announced a temporary halt in operations, and the layoff of forty employees. The company, in Franklin, Louisiana, has a large payroll because it uses an elaborate process of cooling and heating to kill several strains of the dangerous Vibrio bacteria.

Managing Partner Patrick Fahey explained Friday that his company's ability to get "oysters has been severely limited as a result of the spill. This is due to the combination of the precautionary closing of some oyster harvest-areas, and, more to the point, the lack of boat crews to go out and harvest oysters in the areas that are open." Workers are making more money toiling for BP in the on-going clean up of the oil spill, he said. "There's been nothing wrong," Fahey hastened to add, "with oysters that we have been bringing in for the last 60 days. The bed closures are erring on the side of caution. But our business revolves around processing 600 to 800 sacks of oysters a day. For the last 60 days, we've been doing maybe 120 sacks. Our people start work at five in the morning but now they're done about 90 minutes later. We've been fighting the good fight, but we are bleeding money and we decided that we've got to do something. We may be able to start back up in the fall, but we're not sure"
With obvious emotion, Fahey lamented that "The ripple effect of this will be terrible. It is very wrenching. This is the only thing that some of our employees know how to do. It will be tough for them to develop other skill sets to find new jobs." Franklin, a town of around 8,000, some 100 miles west of New Orleans, is best known as a hub for growing sugarcane.
Besides his obvious displeasure with BP, Fahey has a bone to pick with Louisiana's governor Bobby Jindal. Last month, Jindal ordered the diversion of fresh water from the Mississippi River into nearby salt marshes, via spillways. These conduits were originally built to relieve pressure when the Mississippi hits flood stage. In this case, however, they're being used to send a torrent of river water to help push oil away from the coast, as it continues spilling from the deep sea BP well in the Gulf.

Many environmentalists favor this oil-blocking move. But it is anathema to the oyster industry, because fresh water lowers the saline levels that oysters need to survive. "We wrote to Governor Jindal a month ago," Fahey said, "via the Louisiana Oyster Task Force, asking him to send a letter to BP, saying that the state has opened up the spillways because of the oil, and that the state considers BP liable for any damages to the oyster stock. We are flabbergasted that Jindal has not sent that letter."

Jindal also faces growing criticism about his highly touted sand-berm construction project. Critics say it was inadequately researched and will not work. There are also unsubstantiated inferences of cronyism in the awarding of huge no-bid contracts. But in the absence of any other plan -- and the apparent lack of a definitive spill-recovery leader -- many Louisianans cling to the berm as an article of faith. Hopes hang heavy on its success, and criticism of it is equated with heresy -- or, at minimum, with yet more ineffectual dithering. Accordingly, Jindal's philosophic reprisal of Theodore Roosevelt's defiant dictum, "while Congress debated, I took Panama," is striking a chord with Louisiana's frustrated populace. So is berm bullishness – along with a call for the resignation of Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen -- on the part of Plaquemines Parish president Billy Nungesser.

But Leonard Bahr, a former Louisiana State University marine sciences faculty member and coastal policy adviser, calls the berm project "a $350 million boondoggle supported by dredging interests that would dig 11.2 Superdome Equivalents of (limited) sand from the delta we're trying to save -- to build temporary barriers against oil that's already in the marshes. Chalk this up as another finger in the eye of science while wool is pulled over the eyes of the public."

In a more dispassionate tone, Robert Young -- professor of coastal geology at Western North Carolina University, and director of the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines – cited "a number of problems with the efficacy of the project and the design -- what little design we've seen.... They're going to begin to erode as soon as they've been constructed, and there are just a lot of missing details to help us understand how effective they would be at trapping the oil."

Nungesser, meanwhile, is taking some criticism for a perceived conflict of interest. He owns a share in a marina that is currently being refurbished at BP's expense. Last year, Nungesser dismissed somewhat similar assertions as "a political witch hunt."

Given Nungesser's local popularity, his new status as a national media darling, and even calls that he should run for president, this line seems unlikely to gain any traction. Such lack of interest in the possibility of politics as usual is fueled by local resentment towards the federal moratorium on oil drilling. If the ban stays in place, it is estimated that at least 10,000 jobs will be lost. Rig workers would be covered by BP, but not people employed by ancillary service companies. For a region that has already lost much of its seafood industry, this would amount to a second catastrophic blow.

Members of Louisiana's congressional delegation are seeking to establish some middle ground that will also address environmental concerns about the safety of continued drilling. As the leak keeps spewing, oil has advanced further into Barataria Bay, once among Louisiana's most bountiful fishing areas. But in an otherwise bleak scenario there is one bit of good news, although it is somewhat qualified. The waters east of Saint Bernard Parish -- some 40 miles east of New Orleans -- have received a clean bill of health, and are open again to commercial fishing. "Normally, " said Patrick Fahey, "we'd get some very good oysters over there. But, again, everyone's working for BP now. I'm told that there are days when not even one single boat goes out to harvest that crop."
Filed Under: Environment, Energy, Oil Spill

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

11 Comments

Filter by:
sgdbaty13

GOD HELP US. The long term health care cost of destroying the Gulf will be immeasurabe. Aside from the obvious, the dispersants being used to break up the oil look like food to the fish, the fish eat the chemicals then we eat the fish. We have lost our way, all we do is argue over politics when our sea is dying. Today a federal judge lifted the moritorium on deep sea drilling. We can't even cap one spill how are we going to handle 2 or 3 of these disasters at once. We must all be insane. We can't look past our own punny lives and think beyond ourselves. God forgive us.

June 22 2010 at 7:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wolfsonnydiane

It got to be extermly frustrating for the die hard republicans as they watch Obama beat them at anything they do. Healthcare done stimulious done a huge secured fund to help clean up the mess in the gulf done. Stock market on the repound done . Reform of banking industry done

June 21 2010 at 2:29 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
ultraclen2

hate to say it but i agree with the pres. on this one the clean up started with b.p. and should be b.p.'s responsibility his wait time was o.k. but at this point he must get this party started and cleaned up very,very, quickly

June 21 2010 at 11:54 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
James

So how many of you have seen the documentry "Black Wave" The story of the Exxon Valdeze oil spill? Obama should issue an order to send everyone in the USA a bottle of Vaseline because after this BP screwing we are all going to need it!

June 20 2010 at 2:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
M Washam

Jobs, oysters, seafood, etc. etc. etc aren't going to be an issue when the earth finally responds to the abuse we're inflicting on it. (In a cataclysmic way I might add) You can only abuse something for so long before it strikes back or dies. This planet is no different and it's only a matter of time.

June 20 2010 at 10:48 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mscowby

The heads of BP can go sailing while our Americans loose their jobs becuase BP refused to do the right thi
g 2 months ago.

How in the heck can one of our elected officials apologize for this countries demise? I live on the Gulf Coast and you who donlt have no real idea of the actulal impact.

June 20 2010 at 8:19 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
alfredschrader

You can only eat oysters during a month that doesn't have an O in it....Al-

June 20 2010 at 7:33 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
nbk4real

Im still trying to figure out what anyone expects the feds to do? They do not have a well fixing sub. We knew Katrina was coming, had weeks to react and what did the feds do? We knew this was going to happen, big oil lies and so do those that support them politically. Obama was going to be skerewed by those on the right regardless of what he did. We all just need to remember that those of us here in the Gulf are very thankful that Obama is on the job because he's done worlds more for us than anyone else including our hypocritcal gov whos now become a laughing stock with his ludicrous ideas.

June 20 2010 at 7:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
pbc444

BP, due to their "standards" (of maximizing THEIR profits at any/all OTHER costs" )is indeed THE obvious culprit but unfortunately NOT alone but in ALL the reality , factor in that NONE are in position to HAVE THE ANSWER . The Fed Govt is blamed as folks really did figure , somehow/someway, surely THEY KNEW or at least WOULD KNOW how to mitigate a situational whatevering enabling an ability to correct situations of ANY magnitude. We decry that pertinent industry "experts" are brought in as figure they have ulterior motivations which some indeed do , we decry that government folks do NOT know and the entire mix is a real conundrum with too many JUST ditheringly point fingers of blame . Life in general is complicated folks, no magick wands to wave and too many do waste precious time and effort looking for scapegoats to blame which may assuage the emotional outrage but does little to actuating a solution. NO easy answers and indeed mounting consequences, along with legitimate outrage and frustrations that will have long term consequentials. Its a damable if one or another is done or not, all just praying for SOMEONE/ANYONE to get a real grip and too many left with nothing but a view of so much slipping away but willing to cling to too many what ifs and if only's . It has already taken a toll and gonna' take even larger ones.(will add, CHANGE of ANY SORT is never easy, and life has shown us all there are no absolute guarentee's but the best thing to do is to cling to HOPE and hopefulsand then ADAPT while learnig "lessons" , figure it a teachable moment, a wake up call , an opportunity for real improvement or an opportunity to exploit to despairing depths with no chance for progress , perhaps no chance for actual survivabiity...need to assess realtime losses and gains and learn what can/must be done differently and how...all of which equal NO EASY TASK but is the real solution and needs folks to work together for THE greater common good of ALL , NOT just the few !!!)

June 20 2010 at 6:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
vnotes365

I agree with President Obama; we need clean energy.

June 20 2010 at 4:29 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>