AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
More Stanley McChrystal Coverage:
- Transcript of President Obama's Remarks on Gen. Stanley McChrystal
- Walter Shapiro: McChrystal, Afghanistan, and the Era of Foreign Policy Austerity
- David Wood: Washington Weighs Gen. McChrystal Replacement
- David Wood: Combat Troops Rally Behind McChrystal
- David Corn: Will a McChrystal Dismissal Be Bad News for War Critics?
Brilliant move, Obama sending in Bush's General, and amusing how some of the biggest 'O' supporters had to Delete their "General betray-us" web pages, etc. Hmmm, now that Bush is gone, the financial black-hole, Endless "war" seems to be a Good thing.
June 29 2010 at 6:57 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyFreedom of speech?! I mean...seriously. If you have never served in the military...then you have NO IDEA what you're talking about! Anyone...and I mean, ANYONE...who has served in any branch of the Armed Forces will tell you that what Gen. McChrystal said and even worst...condoned from his subordinates...regarding the civilian military leadership was WRONG. Plain and simple. Yeah...it probably does seem a little far-fetched for the average American civilian that the President reacted the way he did...but then again...there's much about the military you won't understand until you actually serve. Sucks that McChrystal had to go...but that's just the way it is when you wear the uniform. And you can rest assured...the General and his subordinates were FULLY aware of the consequences of their actions. Or rather, words.
June 29 2010 at 12:29 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyObams screwed up letting his insecurity and ego do his thinking for him.
June 28 2010 at 6:25 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyRead the article in "Rolling Stone." To me, the meaningful info was not so much about McChrystal's views, language, etc, but about how absolutely the Afgan War has become ...thanks to 1) Bush and now 2) Obama... the new Vietnam.....with the same eventual out come!
June 26 2010 at 2:57 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIt seems a bit ironic that, when Bush was in office, civilian criticisms of the president's policies (often arguably insane - often based on false pretenses, aka blatant lies) were decried (by right wing zealots) as somehow being unpatriotic (if not downright treasonous), and now, with Obama in the oval office, clear-cut insubordination within the military seems to be viewed, by (probably) the same folks, (rather oddly) as exercising some sort of (utterly non-existent in the military) right to "free speech".
June 25 2010 at 4:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down Replyi think i agree with what you are trying to say.... :)
June 25 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down Replywell, i agree with the part about the military not having the right to free speech, in some situations. that's just the way it is. as a member of the military you just accept that. it's all good! :)
June 25 2010 at 5:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyIn 2007 the prez hammered Petraeus in congress, Mrs. clinton said she didn't believe him, the NY times ran an ad from moveon.org calling him General Be Tray US, how fast the winds of war change opinions, from a liar to the greatest general since MacArthur.
June 24 2010 at 7:19 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyMcChystal was behind the coverup of the NFL player that was killed by friendly fire.
He should have been fired for that.
......military men are allowed to die to protect our freedoms....including these are the right to free speech.
June 24 2010 at 12:04 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThis war has been and is a disaster. Hopefully General Petraeus will end this war quickly and stop all this needless killing. BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!
June 24 2010 at 10:25 AM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyWishful Thinking! This is now the longest ever US "war", from which we were to withdraw from in 2011.. but surprise, surprise, the same one who made that "promise" just extended it indefinitely. We don't even know exactly Why we are there, but it Isn't to win a clear military victory! And I can only suspect that General McChrystal knows what they are up to, and Had Enough!
June 29 2010 at 6:43 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyAfter reading the article in "Rolling Stone's" magazine, it became apparent to me that Gen Mc Crystal did not criticize the president at all. What has happened to the first amendment? As for what he said about the Vice Pres, this also must be taken with a grain of salt. Why? Because Biden was using the White House lawn to play with "water guns". Is this considered professional when we are at war? In my opinion, we took a General whose experience, and dedication is without question, because of the insecurity of one man. Please, note the type of magazine this was in, was it in the New York times? No. Here was a man, back from war, not an arm chair General, but, a man who went into the field with his men, who fought in two wars, was a recon marine and this man we are discarding?There is no winning this war no matter who is in office.
There is another way to look at this which I have, and, that is that Mc Crystal wanted out, seeing how this administration was going, my opinion, but, I am not alone in this view
Petraeus is a good man, but, not in the same league, but, in my opinion, will be more malleable.
ABeautyinVelvet
What I got from the article was... we have a pit fighting bulldog of a General McChrystal speaking frankly as if he was on the battlefield. However, he's being expected to behave as if he's in the pet boutique getting a wash and clip.
What do you want? A fighter or a dandie?
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
883 Comments