Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

McChrystal Relieved of Duty; Petraeus to Take Command in Afghanistan

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, under fire for comments made in a Rolling Stone profile, has resigned as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan. Gen. David Petraeus, presently head of the U.S. Central Command, which oversees the operation in Afghanistan, has been nominated to take over the position but must first face Senate confirmation hearings.

The changes, announced by the president Wednesday afternoon, appeared to receive bipartisan support in Congress. They followed a morning meeting at the White House between McChrystal and Obama to discuss the general's incendiary remarks.

The president announced that he had accepted McChrystal's decision to step down, saying the general's "conduct represented in the article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general. It undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system. And it erodes the trust that is necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan."

Obama sought to alleviate concerns about changing commanders in the midst of war, saying: "War is bigger than any one man or woman -- whether a private, a general, or a president. As difficult as it is to lose General McChrystal, I believe that it is the right decision for our national security." He added that he had discussed the change with his national security team, saying: "Now is the time for all of us to come together. I welcome debate among my team, but I won't tolerate division."

The president praised McChrystal's career of service, noting that he "has earned a reputation as one of our nation's finest soldiers. . . . It saddens me to lose the service of a soldier who I've come to respect and admire." He reiterated that the decision did not reflect a fundamental change in policy, but in personnel, explaining that Petraeus had helped "support and design" the current Afghanistan military policy. Obama lauded McChrystal's successor -- who implemented the surge strategy in Iraq: "He is setting an extraordinary example of service and patriotism by assuming this difficult post."

Earlier on Tuesday, Obama had said that McChrystal had used "poor judgment" in his comments critical of administration officials, but that he had not yet "made a final judgment" on what to do with the general. The same day, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs announced that "all options are on the table."

More Stanley McChrystal Coverage:

- Transcript of President Obama's Remarks on Gen. Stanley McChrystal
- Walter Shapiro: McChrystal, Afghanistan, and the Era of Foreign Policy Austerity
- David Wood: Washington Weighs Gen. McChrystal Replacement
- David Wood: Combat Troops Rally Behind McChrystal
- David Corn: Will a McChrystal Dismissal Be Bad News for War Critics?

McChrystal met the president in the Oval Office at 9:51 a.m., and their meeting lasted approximately 30 minutes. McChrystal had been scheduled to attend an 11:35 a.m. meeting in the Situation Room on Afghanistan and Pakistan, alongside senior administration officials -- many whom McChrystal derided in the Rolling Stone article -- but left the White House following his meeting with Obama.

It is unclear whether McChrystal had submitted his resignation prior to the meeting with Obama. Rumors that McChrystal had submitted his resignation on Tuesday appeared to be incorrect: As McChrystal entered the Pentagon earlier Wednesday for a meeting with Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, he was asked by NBC News to confirm the submission of his resignation. He responded, "Come on, you know better than that. No!"

In a Wednesday afternoon press conference, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) applauded the president's decision, with McCain saying, "We are confident that General Petraeus' leadership will have a very positive effect on the situation in the region," though he added, "We still have concerns about the civilian side" and went on to question the planned timetable for a drawdown of troops in July of 2011.

House Republican leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement that he respected the president's decision and that "House Republicans stand ready to work with the President to ensure our troops have all the resources and support from Congress they need to complete their mission successfully." And in a statement released Wednesday afternoon, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) noted, "[The president's] decision to return General Petraeus to the battlefield provides not just continuity in philosophy, but tested diplomatic skill."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

883 Comments

Filter by:
xxo1984

Brilliant move, Obama sending in Bush's General, and amusing how some of the biggest 'O' supporters had to Delete their "General betray-us" web pages, etc. Hmmm, now that Bush is gone, the financial black-hole, Endless "war" seems to be a Good thing.

June 29 2010 at 6:57 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Kenny

Freedom of speech?! I mean...seriously. If you have never served in the military...then you have NO IDEA what you're talking about! Anyone...and I mean, ANYONE...who has served in any branch of the Armed Forces will tell you that what Gen. McChrystal said and even worst...condoned from his subordinates...regarding the civilian military leadership was WRONG. Plain and simple. Yeah...it probably does seem a little far-fetched for the average American civilian that the President reacted the way he did...but then again...there's much about the military you won't understand until you actually serve. Sucks that McChrystal had to go...but that's just the way it is when you wear the uniform. And you can rest assured...the General and his subordinates were FULLY aware of the consequences of their actions. Or rather, words.

June 29 2010 at 12:29 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
punnster

Obams screwed up letting his insecurity and ego do his thinking for him.

June 28 2010 at 6:25 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
bjw367

Read the article in "Rolling Stone." To me, the meaningful info was not so much about McChrystal's views, language, etc, but about how absolutely the Afgan War has become ...thanks to 1) Bush and now 2) Obama... the new Vietnam.....with the same eventual out come!

June 26 2010 at 2:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
robertmwright

It seems a bit ironic that, when Bush was in office, civilian criticisms of the president's policies (often arguably insane - often based on false pretenses, aka blatant lies) were decried (by right wing zealots) as somehow being unpatriotic (if not downright treasonous), and now, with Obama in the oval office, clear-cut insubordination within the military seems to be viewed, by (probably) the same folks, (rather oddly) as exercising some sort of (utterly non-existent in the military) right to "free speech".

June 25 2010 at 4:46 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to robertmwright's comment
paul

i think i agree with what you are trying to say.... :)

June 25 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
paul

well, i agree with the part about the military not having the right to free speech, in some situations. that's just the way it is. as a member of the military you just accept that. it's all good! :)

June 25 2010 at 5:13 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

In 2007 the prez hammered Petraeus in congress, Mrs. clinton said she didn't believe him, the NY times ran an ad from moveon.org calling him General Be Tray US, how fast the winds of war change opinions, from a liar to the greatest general since MacArthur.

June 24 2010 at 7:19 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
jbivens544

McChystal was behind the coverup of the NFL player that was killed by friendly fire.
He should have been fired for that.

June 24 2010 at 6:11 PM Report abuse -7 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

......military men are allowed to die to protect our freedoms....including these are the right to free speech.

June 24 2010 at 12:04 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
andrc657

This war has been and is a disaster. Hopefully General Petraeus will end this war quickly and stop all this needless killing. BRING OUR TROOPS HOME!

June 24 2010 at 10:25 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to andrc657's comment
xxo1984

Wishful Thinking! This is now the longest ever US "war", from which we were to withdraw from in 2011.. but surprise, surprise, the same one who made that "promise" just extended it indefinitely. We don't even know exactly Why we are there, but it Isn't to win a clear military victory! And I can only suspect that General McChrystal knows what they are up to, and Had Enough!

June 29 2010 at 6:43 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
abeautyinvelvet

After reading the article in "Rolling Stone's" magazine, it became apparent to me that Gen Mc Crystal did not criticize the president at all. What has happened to the first amendment? As for what he said about the Vice Pres, this also must be taken with a grain of salt. Why? Because Biden was using the White House lawn to play with "water guns". Is this considered professional when we are at war? In my opinion, we took a General whose experience, and dedication is without question, because of the insecurity of one man. Please, note the type of magazine this was in, was it in the New York times? No. Here was a man, back from war, not an arm chair General, but, a man who went into the field with his men, who fought in two wars, was a recon marine and this man we are discarding?There is no winning this war no matter who is in office.
There is another way to look at this which I have, and, that is that Mc Crystal wanted out, seeing how this administration was going, my opinion, but, I am not alone in this view
Petraeus is a good man, but, not in the same league, but, in my opinion, will be more malleable.

ABeautyinVelvet

June 24 2010 at 8:54 AM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to abeautyinvelvet's comment
codifex maximus

What I got from the article was... we have a pit fighting bulldog of a General McChrystal speaking frankly as if he was on the battlefield. However, he's being expected to behave as if he's in the pet boutique getting a wash and clip.

What do you want? A fighter or a dandie?

June 27 2010 at 2:27 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners