AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
To which I reply, "Lumping Communism in with religion is like saying: 'There are two kinds of religious people – those who believe in God and those who don't.' "Should we all not just look for the same "them" and there will be no "who".
June 27 2010 at 10:00 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyEarl, I'm sorry, I tried and tried and still failed to still the obnoxious beast within that screams 'WHOM' not "WHO'!!!!! Some of us are marked for life by good early English teachers.
Otherwise, a fun article.
Bill Maher wouldn't know what relgion was if it jumped up and bit him on his lips. By redefining what words mean if,you can make any body including elephant boy Bill into anything you want.; except in thias case, Maher has taken care of that himself....A neo-philosper with an intellect of Richard "out of touch" Dawkins
Pure religion is to visit and take care of the infirmed, widows and the orphans
Actually, there are Christians that are tolerant of other religions, but will fight others that attack them just because of their religion.
June 27 2010 at 3:32 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyMahler is correct in comparing communism to religion, in that both reflect an extremist way of thinking. I don't oppose people engaging in religious beliefs, but I do oppose them imposing such beliefs Into policy decisions that affect all of us. Any system of thought based on absolutism is dangerous to human well being, and religion is one of the worst offenders of this.
June 27 2010 at 10:53 AM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down Replyjn,
You said, "Any system of thought based on absolutism is dangerous to human well being"
Without absolutism, where would we be? Whose "right" and "wrong" would we follow? From your words, and those of many of the other posters, I certainly would not be comfortable with your definitions.
I'm very happy with God's definitions of right and wrong.
Regards
thanks for the article. beautiful insight to see publicly available. Us against them has always been the issue. Duality is not reality even though our minds convince us that it is real. In the religious context of this article the concept is clearly shown in the Adam and Eve story. Told "do not eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. That good and evil part is key and is most often left out. The knowledge of good and evil implying that before this there was no good and evil, no concept of duality. Only when we suddenly had some idea that some of creation was wrong and other parts were right did we lose that state of consciousness we can call Eden. Now we fight for good against evil when there, in reality, is neither. And as long as we do the garden will be lost to us.
June 27 2010 at 9:19 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyMrT,
There absolutely IS evil in this world.
Why else would men all over the world try to eradicate people who are "not them?" Why would people deliberately fly airplanes into buildings, killing as many as they can?
Saint Paul knew that when he said, "Put on the armor of God, so we can stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places."
Regards
Wherefore art thou "them?"
Territory is important to large primates like humans. Also important -- imposing order onto randomness. We do that in dualistic terms. Day/night, good/evil, us and them. We create idealistc forms in our "higher" consciousness
Art, music, religion are all institutions of the ape. Would an ape given a typewriter and enough time create "War and Peace?" The answer, of course, is that one already did. But he was one of "them."
Maher is essentially right as organized religion is a governance body with all the amenities of most governmental processes. Fees for services, whether being gifts, tithing, donations, fees or taxes. They inflict penalties for not following their ways including imprisonment and death. The way the officials get in power varies a bit but in many cases are jobs for life without much input from the people that pay their way. In the end, both may be a necessity but also a curse
June 27 2010 at 7:40 AM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
11 Comments