Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Obama Announces Wireless Broadband 'Revolution'

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Last Thursday, President Obama seemed to be having a tough time with the internet. In a joint press conference with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, the U.S. leader made a largely imperceptible gaffe, referring to Medvedev's visit to the Silicon Valley headquarters of "Twitter's" (rather than "Twitter"). Thanks to the very technology that makes Twitter possible, Obama's mistake was heard round the world with alarming speed, and in no time, the misstatement was fodder for parody from all corners. If the president has his way, that speed of transmission will only increase in the coming years.

On Monday, Obama signed a presidential memorandum calling for the federal government to free up 500 megahertz of wireless communication spectrum from both federal and private sources, nearly doubling the amount currently available. This spectrum will then be made available by auction: though the majority of it will be directed towards "mobile broadband and other high-value uses," the memorandum does allow for the sharing of spectrum between the government and private sector, and for free, unlicensed use of spectrum by technology startups, small businesses and individual users.

The first step of the plan is for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) to identify -- by October 1, 2010 -- existing spectrum that may be freed up for federal and shared use. Reallocation of spectrum will be voluntary. The New York Times reports roughly 45% of the spectrum will come from federal agencies "asked to give up allocations that they are not using or could share." Those that do so will be reimbursed for costs relating to changes made to their systems to accommodate for the reallocation.

Barack ObamaPending congressional approval, private companies that choose to reallocate their spectrum will be reimbursed through FCC-led "incentive" auctions. A bulk of this private-sector reallocation is expected to come from television broadcast companies and cable television channels. The White House is seeking further seeking Congressional approval to use proceeds from the auction of federal spectrum to upgrade federal agencies' communications systems and establish a new, "interoperable wireless broadband network for public safety." The aim of this network would be to ensure better coordination between emergency services across different jurisdictions, a problem identified in the wake of 9/11.

Proceeds from the auction would also be directed to reducing the budget deficit and supporting infrastructure initiatives, including a SmartGrid and high speed rail systems.

The Obama administration is touting the broadband initiative as a "win-win" situation, and senior administration officials pointed to a host of benefits arising from the greater access spectrum, including applications in health care, energy, education and public safety.

Officials cited wireless access as critical for the United States to remain on the cutting edge of technological innovation and developing "21st-century jobs," saying, "Acting quickly will help the United States remain competitive." The White House cited a recent study noting that, "GDP can increase $7 to $10 for every dollar invested in mobile wireless broadband networks," adding that, "mobile wireless broadband generates huge productivity gains to the U.S. economy; some estimate that those benefits are valued at $28 billion per year and rising, with combined mobile wireless voice and broadband productivity gains set to reach $427 billion annually by 2016. "

Perhaps most importantly, the White House has pointed to the initiative as critical in reducing the "digital divide." Fifty percent of adults in rural households have broadband access at home, compared with 68 percent in non-rural households. According to the White House, increased access to spectrum will help bring down costs and raise quality, providing better access and encouraging adoption among unserved and minority communities, who have traditionally had much lower adoption rates.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

Where is the "free access" for "individual users"?

June 29 2010 at 6:22 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply

One more thing for the government to run and screw up.

June 28 2010 at 6:05 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply

So the govt. is freeing up more bandwidth, does this mean when if govt. had not been in the way in the first place we would have already had more bandwidth????

June 28 2010 at 4:48 PM Report abuse +8 rate up rate down Reply

I think it is a good idea, widening the effect of communicating with one another, I just find no confidence in this leader promoting it

June 28 2010 at 4:21 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to joedenver60's comment

Ted is right; ignorance is bliss.

June 28 2010 at 5:03 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply

hello, people who know the extent of their goals for our internet realize that our internet will end up being more restrictive than China's.

June 29 2010 at 8:08 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply


June 28 2010 at 3:43 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to joe's comment


June 28 2010 at 4:57 PM Report abuse -14 rate up rate down Reply

The only Revolution I want to see is the return of our country to a Republic which is not in debt to the point that we can never pay it back.

June 28 2010 at 3:42 PM Report abuse +21 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to getgary01's comment
Welcome Mr. Robb

Eric is right, we should close all 600 military outposts all over the world and bring our troops home to defend the homeland. That will shave off about a couple of trillion$ in a hurry.

June 28 2010 at 5:51 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply

One of these days in the age of Technology, our congressmen senators and law makers will not have to be in one room or even move to Washington DC to serve their terms. They can stay home, be conneted by the internet and make judgements and descissions without intimidation from fellow congressmen, senators etc. No more good old boy, back room deals, bribery or intimidation.

June 28 2010 at 3:20 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to skistrick's comment

if that's true, then no one will ever have to leave their homes to do anything. no more offices. no more meetings. no more conventions. no more trade shows. no more need for commercial/office construction or convention centers, courtrooms..... you must think that all face to face meetings have no advantages or benefits and only have negative connotations and characteristics.

June 28 2010 at 3:31 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>