Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

E-Mail Hoax Reports Deaths of Sens. Leahy, Feinstein, Lautenberg

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
They're alive and well.

Phony e-mails reported this week that Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Dianne Feinstein of California and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey had died of liver cancer.

Word of the hoax broke Tuesday as Sen. Robert Byrd, who died last week, was buried in a private ceremony. Leahy's office said the e-mails were designed to appear as though they were sent by Senate staffers, the Burlington Free Press reported. Capitol Police are investigating the grim gag; the e-mails went to a number of radio and television stations as well as newspapers.
Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont
The 86-year-old Lautenberg recently completed treatment for lymphoma of the stomach. Leahy was in the public eye last month when he chaired Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.
Filed Under: Senate, Democrats, Gaffes, Congress

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

19 Comments

Filter by:
bnylons

Would anybody besides their immediate family really care? Politicians have become nothing more than a waste of taxpayers money and a real burden to society.

July 07 2010 at 5:11 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
peacenik1965

Unfortunately, term limits will only make things worse. Just about the only thing that keeps most politicians from being completely dishonest is the fear of losing the next election. Granted, that same fear is what prevents them from voting their conscience on important matters. Either way, it's the caliber of individual who runs for public office that is the problem. And it's the lack of serious knowledge on the part of the average American voter that is to blame. The most qualified people to hold public office generally choose not to run because they don't wish to degrade themselves by participating in our superficial political process. As a result, we get the "leadership" we deserve. The sad fact about this latest hoax is that it was conceived by someone with the full knowledge that - as is the case with most dirty politics these days - it has the potential to influence the opinions of the large number of uninformed voters who tend to sway most elections. We don't need term limits; We need an informed electorate!

July 07 2010 at 5:09 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to peacenik1965's comment
pulsefire

Very well stated.

July 07 2010 at 5:25 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
ae12wrangell

Who would concoct this stuff, and why?

July 07 2010 at 5:07 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
adelani

I do agree with term limits, but perhaps not just 2 terms. but at least of limit of 20 years. It seems that some of the really old timers get to having to much power and are a little to savvy about wheeling and dealing. and there sure is a lot of that going on in Washington now. and it has been for the last 50 or so years. perhaps longer. While they represent their state they are supposed to look at the big picture and some just don't do that. the whats in it for me mentality seems to take over...

July 07 2010 at 4:57 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to adelani's comment
pulsefire

repukeslie7- The constitutionally mandated term limits to which you refer work well only with a well informed electorate and honest candidates. Unfortunately, we have neither.

July 07 2010 at 5:30 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
wendy30263

Refichter - A couple of weeks in? Try a couple of years in and yes, he has been a terrible President to this point. He is a rookie and his lack of experience is showing. He is way in over his head. The change to put Liberals in complete control of both houses and the White House was NOT the change America needed. I just hope we survive it with our nation still in tact when the dust settles. A big controlling Government and massive new entitlements are horrible things for Freedom.

July 07 2010 at 4:54 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to wendy30263's comment
ckandrus2001

Just curious Wendy, did you complain about Bush at all? What are your thoughts on him and what responsibility do you think he has for the mess we are in? I am guessing you said nothing about it when Bush was in office.

July 07 2010 at 5:01 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
carolyn

I find it very ironic that the very people who are now complaining about the democratic president, senate, and house are the same republicans who spent us into a huge deficit from 2000-2008. The economy was in a downward slide years before the election of 2008. Our national debt rose from 5.4 trillion in 2001 when President Bush and the other republicans took office, to 12 trillion in 2009 when President Obama was sworn in. They were also responsible for getting us into a war based on lies told by those in high office. In 2001, there was also a 700 billion dollar surplus in the budget left by President Clinton. It did not take very long for that money to be wasted.

I was not in favor of electing President Obama, I felt he did not have enough experience for the highest elected job in the country. But it is not the democrats who are on a spending spree, they are trying to clean up the mess left by 14+ years of a republican house and senate majority. 8 years under President bush and since 1994 when they took over in the middle of President Clinton's first term.

I do not advocate voting for one party of the other, I do believe you should vote for the person on their own merit. But until all the children learn to play together, there will always be a fight in the school yard. And it will be the American taxpayers who are caught in the middle.

July 07 2010 at 5:45 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
wilkesgm

I'm not sure what you mean by nonsense. Bankrupting the country and destroying the ability of Americans to advance via their own initiative, hard work and perseverance isn't a laughing matter. Your children and grandchildren have been signed up for a 20 trillion dollar debt by these people. Wishing them dead is mindless. Wishing them defeated in an honest election is as serious as a heart attack. As for term limits, the current congress is going to do more damage after they become lame ducks in November than all of the damage done in the last 20 years. Unless you vote for people who are fiscally responsible and love the country, a single term is enough to wreck the train. Keeping someone around who has the same basic values as the founders is a good idea. Sending them home is stupid.

July 07 2010 at 12:53 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to wilkesgm's comment
Dennis Wayne

All elected and apointed public servants should only be allowed two terms couple that with publicly funded elections and that will go a long way toward righting this ship.

July 07 2010 at 4:17 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
pulsefire

Dennis- the problem with term limits is that the good get dumped along with the bad. Kind of hard to say which is worse- keeping an ineffective official or getting rid of an effective one. Maybe a slight modification- no more than two consecutive terms. Public funding of elections is, in theory, a good idea, but who decides how much money to spend on which candidate? Voting for people who are "fiscally responsible and love the country" sounds great, but how many candidates have been elected promising one thing and delivering another? Maybe we can initiate recall elections rather than waiting for some of these politicians to finish their terms and do more damage.

July 07 2010 at 5:24 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
cptberm55

If we had term limits this type of nonsense wouldn't be happening ......

July 07 2010 at 12:31 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to cptberm55's comment
Kathy

You are so right. We need a complete overhaul of Washington.

July 07 2010 at 12:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
refichter

We DO have term limits. It's called voting. Vote them in or out as they deserve. Keep informed by pursuing the facts not a bunch of name calling and hyberbole. (Poor Obama was being called the worst president ever a couple weeks into his time in the office! Ridiculous!) We need some system that ALSO rewards good work. Changing EVERYBODY every other term is NOT a good idea.

July 07 2010 at 4:40 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners