Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Iran Bans (Bad) Western Haircuts, Putting Men Under Moralists' Gaze

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
"Business in the front; party in the back." So goes the famous descriptor of the signature retro haircut -- the mullet -- that is short at the front and sides and long in the back.

But not in Iran. The country's religious leaders have recently issued a catalog of acceptable "Islamic" male haircuts, and noticeably absent are ponytails, spikes, mullets and Mohawks. More styles are set to be unveiled Sunday at the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance's Veil and Chastity Day festival.

The ban on haircuts is but the latest in a long line of efforts by the Iranian regime to counter "decadent" Western trends within the country. Back in 2005, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad signed a decree banning all Western music that "does not conform to Islamic doctrines and the spirit of the Islamic Revolution." Women have long been subject to all sorts of restrictions on their dress, facing fines of up to $1,300 for improper hijabs (head scarves) and $400 for having a suntan. Earlier this summer, dogs were added to the no-can-do list (apparently, friendship with dogs is a "blind imitation of the West," according to one Ayatollah) as well as expensive foreign cars (which are deemed "harassment to women").

Iran hairstyle banAnd, of course, it's not just Iran where the morality police are out in force. As my colleague Alex Wagner has documented before, there's been a trend towards more stringent dress codes all over the Islamic world. Bans on jeans and tight pants have cropped up even in more moderate Islamic states like Indonesia.

There are lots of reasons to fear this trend. As Alex argued cogently, getting the state involved in fashion is a slippery slope. And that's not only because the tactics employed to enforce these bans (like equipping police with video cameras to film "immodestly attired" women, as is happening in Teheran) is often demeaning and inappropriate.

By feeding the image of Islam as an intolerant, repressive, misogynistic religion, such bans also heighten anti-Islamic sentiment in the West, triggering a tit-for-tat like response from Western governments. Several European countries are either contemplating or have already passed legislation banning some form of face veils. In my view, all this symbolic posturing over East vs. West only serves to throw fuel onto a fire that's already very dangerous (which is precisely why I have argued repeatedly against bans on burqas in the West).

But lest you're ready to tear your hair out (pun intended) over all these modesty codes, it's not all bad news. For starters, restrictive dress codes in Islamic countries are usually directed at women. But the ban on haircuts -- as well as the frowning on owning expensive foreign cars -- are both targeted at men. In a world where, despite a growing trend toward equality of the sexes, things are not always equal in practice, it's sort of refreshing to see that women aren't the only ones being blamed for corrupting Iranian morals. (Yeah, I know: A ban on haircuts isn't exactly a step forward for modernity, but at least it's leveling the playing field a bit.)

On a more serious note, it's also possible that the politics of dress is exposing a deeper fissure within Iran's ruling elite. Ironically enough, Ahmadinejad -- not exactly a paragon of civil liberties -- has been arguing recently that it's not the government's job to crack down on styles of dress. This has earned him the ire of various conservative ayatollahs and politicians, who've been thundering against "half-naked" women roaming the streets.

The political science literature on democratization tells us that the decline of authoritarian rule is almost always precipitated by fissures between so-called "hardliners" and "softliners" over how much -- and which types -- of political liberalization to allow.

So, who knows, maybe these latest crackdowns, which have apparently been greeted with resentment on "the Iranian street," will provoke some kind of backlash and drive a larger wedge between warring factions within the Iranian government.

And maybe then people really will let their hair down.

Follow Delia on Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

9 Comments

Filter by:
pepingatieza2

TANIROCKER:

So?
In the Soviet Union there was no church, yet the government imposed all kinds of restrictions on the citizens. When it comes to dictatorship, you do not need two to Tango.

July 08 2010 at 7:14 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
tanirocker

THIS is why we have separation of church and state.

July 08 2010 at 5:22 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
eskieme1970

This is not at all about modesty. They hate all things western. They put a ban on pets in Saudi Arabia because it looked "too American" to have a pet.

July 08 2010 at 4:40 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
lloydbonifide

We should outlaw the "mullet" in the U.S. ,instead of just snickering every time you see a rube with one.

July 08 2010 at 3:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
stvrahn

Wow, the writer has argued against banning burqas in the west....because it just adds fuel to the fire. Well, if western attire is an affront to Iran, than Iranian attire should be an affront to us. There is nothing like mirroring hypocrisy to point out it's evils to hypocrites. And no, cracking down on men's attire isn't leveling the playing field....its lowering it.

July 08 2010 at 2:37 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
Geri Ann Massaro

They obviously don't trust their men to be able to look at a woman's face in public, which sheds a negative light on the Iranian men. Kudos to our "western men" eho obviously know how to be respectful of women no matter how they are dressed. Perhaps they can learn a thing or two from "our men."

July 08 2010 at 1:43 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Geri Ann Massaro's comment
Eric

This is in no way a justification for the conservative Islamic nations' treatment of women, but it was not that long ago that the Western world had similar notions about women and the protection of their "modesty." Nations that go through a modernization process, which also means a secularization of society, learn that notions about feminine wiles are usually overblown.

July 08 2010 at 2:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wtmorton73

"...such bans also heighten anti-Islamic sentiment in the West..."

Actually, using suicidal maniacs to blow up our civilians heightens anti-Islamic sentiment in the West. If they want to outlaw sucky hairstyles, more power to you. Just stop being all crazy for your heathen religion. *******.

July 08 2010 at 12:31 PM Report abuse +10 rate up rate down Reply
glers

Iran bans bad haircuts but the stoning to death of women is still okay ???

July 08 2010 at 12:27 PM Report abuse +17 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>