Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Stoning Averted for Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani, Iran's Alleged Adultress

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Iranian government backed down under international pressure from carrying out a death sentence by stoning of a woman convicted of adultery, a victory for human-rights activists, but far from the final act in the ongoing drama between the forces of modernism and a perverted and outdated interpretation of Islamic fundamentalism.

The woman, 43-year-old Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani, remains in jail with her punishment uncertain. She has already been in prison for five years and received 99 lashes for an "illicit relationship" that she confessed to at the time, but later recanted, saying she was under duress.

The International Committee Against Stoning and Execution – yes, it exists – is urging human-rights groups and celebrities, including Robert Redford, Emma Thompson and Colin Firth, to keep up the pressure on Iran to take the next step to rescind Sakineh's sentence and release her without condition. Mina Ahadi, who 30 years ago faced a death sentence in Iran and heads the committee, told Channel 4 news in the United Kingdom: "Sex outside of marriage and the sexual relations of adults is a private affair. It is not a crime and must never be prosecuted." According to Amnesty International, three other women charged with adultery in Iran since 2006 who escaped death by stoning were eventually executed by hanging.

What brought attention to Sakineh's plight in the male-dominated Islamic culture was the willingness of her 22-year-old son, Sajad Ghader-zade, to publicly defend his mother and put his own life at risk by appealing to the outside world for help, saying there is "no justice" in his country.

In a death-by-stoning case 24 years ago that prompted the documentary, "The Stoning of Soraya M.," the woman's two oldest sons did not stand by her, insuring her condemnation by the family and the broader culture. Progress is slow when measured against our expectations, but the intervening years and generation newly aware of the outside world have made a difference in attitudes in Iran, and in the government's response to outside pressure.

The highest levels of the British government took up Sakineh's cause, with British Foreign Secretary William Hague denouncing death by stoning as "a medieval punishment which has no role in the modern world." It's hard to imagine anybody disagreeing with that, but retired British diplomat Tim Collard posted a blog declaring his "lifelong love affair with the Middle Ages," and pointing out that while the era was brutal with beheadings and burnings, and disemboweling people before chopping them into quarters, stoning is more accurately associated with the biblical period.

The description of exactly how stoning is done is spelled out by civil-rights and civil-liberties activist Tom Head in a book published last year titled "Civil Liberties: A Beginner's Guide." He takes his information from Iran's penal code, which says men should be buried up to their waists and women to their shoulders (so their breasts are covered), and the stones should be small enough that death will not result from one or two blows, but large enough to cause physical harm. A crowd of volunteers throws the stones, and the average execution takes at least 10 to 20 minutes, cruel and unusual punishment for sure.

Death by stoning is so abhorrent that it's easy to get sidetracked by the method of punishment as opposed to the alleged crime. Iran's penal code says adultery must be proven by "repeated confession," or the testimony of witnesses -- four men or three men and two women. Setting aside the ludicrousness of assembling that size audience for anything other than gang rape, the law is not subtle -- two women count as one man. In Sakineh's case, where no eyewitnesses stepped forward, the three judges who found her guilty acted without evidence and on their own knowledge. In Iranian law, judges ruling in "hodud," or cases of morality, don't need evidence and can substitute their own judgment or intuition as to whether the accused is guilty. In other words, it's a set-up.
Filed Under: Iran, Woman Up, International

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

24 Comments

Filter by:
fatimapatel786

Its shocking to see how the world thinks of Islam...These countries do follow Shaaria law, but Shaaria law is in depth and deep! One cannot judge the religion based on how the country has adapted its laws as many have "changed" the Sharia Law. Sharia law states that for someone to be termed an adulteress there must be FOUR witnesses to prove that they have seen the offense been committed. How unlikely is this? That there will be four people to see the actual act being done, Highly, highly unlikely. If there were four witnesses then only can the offender be stoned. therefore this case is not following Sharia law! And rightfully this women should not be stoned as the evidence is not substantial. That too there are certain protocols that must be followed if she had to be stoned...another thing is that these people know the consequences of their actions in their country, its like how if we had to commit murder we will be sentenced to jail. We know the consequence so we wont murder someone. In their country Adultery is a crime. They should leave the country if they not happy with its laws if they do not wish to be persecuted then they should not break the laws. its as simple as that.

September 07 2010 at 3:41 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
rlpjr2

Finally someone in Iran got the message that they DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO KILL EVERYONE THAT DISAGREES WITH THEIR FANATICAL SHARIA LAW!! I am soooo Happy that this lady will have the right to live and continue her life hopefully here in America under political asylum where she can have freedom once again. I can't take this crap anymore and we as the strongest nation in the world should step up and do something about this ignorant stupid law. I hope one day we get the courage to do what needs to be done and bring freedom to all people around the world.

August 30 2010 at 8:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brags Srinivasan

@jancf:
I agree with you that it is wrong to extrapolate to arrive at facts based on a few sensationlist facts.

Since you claimed "ignorance is never an excuse...", I found your comment mentioning India and Indonesia in the same breath and how Bollywood wouldn't have flourished (Bollywood as a litmus test for liberty! Haha! Even Indian politicians don't use that!), very amusing.

First, the last that I checked (it's quite easy because I live in India), India is not an Islamic country nor is it bound by Shariah. So, using that as a foundation of your argument, while calling on others to check on their facts, is quite hypocritical.

July 31 2010 at 6:36 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
beemerboxer

This primitive and barbaric way of dealing with an adultress could only emanate from a philosophy still mired in the Dark Ages. Adultery is a human weakness and as such is not a crime to be dealt with judicialy. The Iranian government has shown its disregard for life and for compassion; Islam continues to prove it has no place in the modern world by its dogma and disregard for its own adherents. Islam bears an attitude to we, the "infidels", that hardly bears thinking about.

July 10 2010 at 11:54 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to beemerboxer's comment
jancf

You're wrong about Islam. While it's tempting to extrapolate stuff like this from headlines, a minute's reflection should tell you that adultery in neither India nor Indonesia results in this kind of stuff. There's a much more widespread, mainstream Islam practiced there. Bollywood would never have lasted this long otherwise.

My daughter has just spent 2 1/2 years as the 'daughter' of an imam in rural Africa. Kinder, gentler, funnier, more tolerant people never walked the earth.

All this generalizing based on the most lurid headlines is extremely dangerous. Ignorance is never an excuse for the spreading of such misinformation.

July 10 2010 at 9:31 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
Harvey

And what happened to the man(men) who supposedly committed adultery with her? We have heard nothing of them. If she is guilty of adultery, she did not commit it alone! That being said, this is another one of those archaic, inhumane forms of punishment that is listed in the Book of Leviticus in the Bible, not just an Islamic teaching.

July 10 2010 at 10:38 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
Nelson

The abuses of the capitalist world have led to the enlightenment of the fundamentalists everywhere. I'm not saying we, the USA are to fault, but our actions in the past have led to their rise, eg: The Shah, Manual Noriega, one time support of Saddam Hussein, the falsehood of The SE Asia Treaty Pact with regard to Vietnam, our continued denial of Cuba while we trade freely with communist Vietnam and China, NAFTA versus Immigration, and/or The Marcos' of the Philippines. The list list goes on but all we have to do is look at what we do to see why others don't care for us. Will we ever wake up?

July 09 2010 at 9:13 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Nelson's comment
purplesatinpjs3

Blame AMERICA FIRST. So typical of liberals.

July 10 2010 at 9:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

..........show me a backward country and I'll show you a country that demeans and undereducates its women. When women have self worth and can be educated I'll show you women who push their children to succeed.

July 09 2010 at 7:36 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
dutchie847

she is gorgeous! so happy she gets to live!!

July 09 2010 at 7:22 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
walkingman50

I must have missed the part in the article where Obama called out the Irani government for their completely ignoring basic human rights with their stone age Sharia law punishments. Probably too busy cleaning up the spill.

July 09 2010 at 7:01 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to walkingman50's comment
Eve

Did *any* foreign leaders do this? No, just a couple of British diplomats. That's because it is inappropriate for a world leader to do, plus it would only hurt the cause if they did. Everything bad in the world isn't Obama's fault.

July 09 2010 at 7:18 PM Report abuse -7 rate up rate down Reply
onestop2050

how come you never hear anything about the man.

July 09 2010 at 6:50 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>