Sarah Palin's PAC Pulls In Nearly $1 Million in Second Quarter

Sarah Palin and tea party candidates like Angle, Paul and Rubio need to explain their cozy relationships with the big corporate interests. Also why do they support even more huge tax cuts for the rich.

do not forget , with every dollar comes thousands of strings attached! she wants to ensure many owe her big as it is the only way she can make it or be anything. a subtle and unique form of bribery . she will buy her way back in after quitting

Go, Sarah! Hope 2 million comes in this week!!!!!

That's $1 Million from hundreds of thousands of regular folks. Scary to Liberals huh? It should be.

1 million a quarter should cover clothing bill

P.T. Barnum would have an accurate take on this.... Something about one being born every minute...

Sarah Palin has created a PAC for only ONE reason. That reason is to put more $$ in her personal bank account. She raised $1 million, but only donated $87,000 to "other AGOP candidates"? Hmmmm. Real Estate agent gets big payout? Hmmmm. SarahPAC buys THOUSANDS of copies of Sarah's book? Hmmmm. (nobody else will buy it, so she has to use campaign contributions to buy it herself, which puts even MORE of that money in HER PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNT.

You may like Sarah, and get a warm and fuzzy when you see her on TV, but just know that her PERSONAL motivation is PURELY about SARAH, and more money for SARAH.

She has uttered NOT ONE WORD about political agenda, platform, or anything else. Her "ads" are 100% ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK.

Remember people, it is easier to SCARE people than to EDUCATE them. Sarah palin is taking great advantage of that FACT.

I think that Sarah Palin has shown herself to be down-to-earth and level-headed and practical. Why should she not choose who she wants to be interviewed by after the stupid way Katie Couric interviewed her? Who cares what she reads on a daily basis, I would find it hard to read anything if I were the mother of five and the Governor of anywhere. I think the time has come to examine the electoral college and to eliminate this antiquated and ridiculous way of voting. With all the technology we have today, who needs it? No other country votes this way.

Sarah Palin is a very attractive lady with a telegenic presence. However she seems to have little understanding of the important issues of the day. She is afraid to be interviewed by anyone other than FOX NEWS who are the right arm of the republican/tea party establishment. She will never be taken seriously until she answers questions from the real media.

Money to campaign is one thing, voter fraud and intimidation is another. Can we keep our polling places safe and honest? Looking at past elections, one would have to question the integrity of our process. With todays' technology, there is no excuse for "dead" voters, illegal immigrant votes, unregistered voters, votes for one candidate being counted for another, etc. This is absurd, and the American people need to demand that some of the billions of our tax dollars being spent on the fish and field mice, needs to be invested in secure and accurate voting mechanisms. Hand print recognition is available, and not all that expensive. When you register to vote, you submit your hand for scanning. When you vote, you again submit your hand for scanning, and that is cross checked with the identification you carry. Much better than the punch cards, hand tallying, paper records, etc., that are in use today, and subject to all sorts of fraud. Absentee ballots should have to be postmarked at least 3 weeks prior to the election, and be the first to be validated and counted. This seems to be the area with the greatest opportunity for fraud.