Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Energy Industry's Lobbying Outlay: $2.9 Billion Since 2000

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Large energy industries, led by oil and gas, have spent a combined $2.9 billion over the past decade on electing candidates, lobbying for industry-friendly policy, and swaying regulators in their favor, according to a report released Tuesday by Common Cause, a nonpartisan organization that monitors money in politics.

Since 1990, donations to lawmakers from employees of energy companies and their political action committees have increased more than 300 percent, according to the report, which is based on public data from the Center for Responsive Politics, a government watchdog group.

While the fact that major industries shower Washington with cash should surprise no one, the numbers are staggering when broken down by member. Energy industries -- just one slice of the private sector -- spent the equivalent of $5.5 million per seat for all 535 seats in the Senate and House of Representatives from 2001 through the first half of 2010. During the first quarter of 2010, energy interests spent $3.2 million per day that Congress was in session -- about $244,000 per member. Only the health care industry spent more.

"Campaigns are getting more expensive and the public policy stakes are growing higher," said Mary Boyle, a spokeswoman for Common Cause. "If we keep going at this rate, we are going to have a corporate-run democracy."

Energy interests tend to favor Republicans, the report found, but their dollars also follow power. Donations to Republicans soared during the Bush administration, when Vice President Dick Cheney manned a secretive energy task force that sought input from industry and delivered a steady stream of perks to corporations. When Democrats regained Congress in 2006, their receipt of energy money increased dramatically. So far this year, Republicans have only a slight edge in donations from oil, gas, mining, and other energy interests.

Boyle said the "pay-to-play game" in Washington would only grow worse after the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission to give corporate speech protection under the First Amendment, effectively prohibiting the federal government from placing limits on the money corporate interests shower on political campaigns.

"Members of Congress are looking over their shoulder," Boyle said. "They are trying to legislate in an environment where they know that if they cast a vote that is to the dislike of a major corporation in their district or anywhere else, that corporation -- or union, for that matter -- can unleash an entire campaign against them. That makes it very hard to legislate in the public interest."

Energy interests have been particularly generous to lawmakers in a position to serve their interests, concentrating their spending on leading lawmakers who serve on energy and regulatory committees.

An analysis by MAPLight, a group that traces influence from money to policy, says that energy dollars have had a direct impact on votes. Before lawmakers voted on Senate Joint Resolution 26, for example, which would have prevented the Environmental Protection Agency from trying to limit motor vehicle emissions, energy interests gave more than $29,000 to the campaigns of each Congress member who supported the measure and about $7,000 to the campaigns of Congress members who voted "no." The resolution was sponsored by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, an Alaska Republican who has received more than $400,000 from oil and gas industries in her eight years in office.

Sitting atop a list that is predominately Republican and top-heavy with Texans, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) leads the current Congress in political donations from oil and gas, having taken in $2,680,000 over the past decade. Others who have accepted more than a million dollars from energy interests include Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), and Sen. Jim Inhoffe (R-Okla.).

Go back further, however, and the list grows more politically balanced. In a list of politicians' all-time totals of donations from energy interests, nearly half are Democrats. No. 3 on the list is President Barack Obama, who racked up nearly $3 million in only seven years in the Senate -- a fact his critics frequently recall when his administration takes strong stands against large corporate interests.

Spending on lobbyists has also increased dramatically over the past decade, rising from around $150 million in 1998 to more than $400 million in 2008. In those 10 years, energy interests have spent $3 billion on 2,300 lobbyists in Washington.

Energy lobbyists have concentrated on swaying regulators. In 2009, 31 companies lobbied Minerals Management Service, the federal agency that oversees offshore oil and gas drilling -- three times as many as lobbied the agency five years earlier.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

9 Comments

Filter by:
rokdoc3

Great point, and transparency of ALL lobbying should be the rule, as well as limits and prohibition of politicians to lobby for at least 5 years after leaving office. Now, how about publishing the amount of money spent on Federal subsidies of alternative/green/renewable energies that have amounted to nothing of tangible benefit?

July 15 2010 at 7:26 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Cody

Great article David.....Thanks for a job well done!

July 14 2010 at 6:31 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
trmnatr2

U.S. GOVERNMENT- Bought and paid for.Why is this allowed?

July 14 2010 at 3:19 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
glers

The new Karl Rove PAC is taking in a lot of oil company dollars, The GOP will always roll over for OIL EXECS

July 14 2010 at 12:59 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
kingnus

Why are republicans moaning about BP giving obama money for his election? THey all cheered when the high court ruled that corporations could give all money they wanted to for elections.

July 14 2010 at 11:45 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
danzillo4

Is Trent Lotts lobbying firm a part of this system or is he just on he board of an ARMS Manufacturer! Foreign Arms Manufacturers! Interviewed by Neal CAvuto, Lott stated he returned to DC because this is where th MONEY AND POWER ARE, unashamedly I might add!

July 14 2010 at 9:40 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
JohnR

"No. 3 on the list is President Barack Obama, who racked up nearly $3 million in only seven years in the Senate -- a fact his critics frequently recall when his administration takes strong stands against large corporate interests."


I guess the critics hate it when he puts principle ahead of money.

July 14 2010 at 9:22 AM Report abuse +12 rate up rate down Reply
Big Daddy

We live in a plutocracy already and all our jabbering about throwing the bums out only results in another crop of bums padding their personel wealth. Just remember regulation is evil and taxing these corporations is the work of the devil, because they really love us and only want to help us.

July 13 2010 at 11:55 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
ddan8719

For real..did the obama campaign receive 2.8 million in campaign donations from energy? With b.p. being the largest contributor..these allegations cannot be right..I refuse to beleive this dribble..

July 13 2010 at 11:49 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
andrc657

The people need to know what deals Cheney made with that secret energy task force. How did those deals affect Halliburton's role in the Iraq war since Cheney was Halliburton's former CEO? How did those secret meetings affect deregulation and the subsequent BP oil disaster?

July 13 2010 at 10:38 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>