Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Bill Clinton and Warren Buffett: Business Boosters for Obama

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
In a sign of the increasingly hostile relationship between the private sector and the Obama administration, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday sent an open letter to the president (as well as to Congress and the American people), blasting those in leadership for "taking their eyes off the ball," "neglecting America's number one priority," and "vilifying industries while embarking on an ill-advised course of government expansion, major tax increases, massive deficits and job-destroying regulations."

In sum, the chamber concluded, "Policymakers are needlessly prolonging economic agony" and have "injected tremendous uncertainty into economic decision-making and business planning." Yowch.

The Obama administration was not totally unprepared for the chamber's broadside, however. On Wednesday, it brought out the big guns: Berkshire Hathaway's chairman and chief executive, Warren Buffett, and former President Bill Clinton, both of whom have very healthy ties to the business community. The pair visited President Barack Obama at the White House, where White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Buffett and the president spoke about "everything under the economic sky," including "how to continue to create jobs in this country, how to keep our economy moving forward."

The Chamber of Commerce's poisoned arrows came on the eve of Obama's scheduled trip to Holland, Michigan, on Thursday in the latest iteration of a now-weekly effort to convince the American public that the economy is on the right track by sending the president to the center of the country to tout jobs growth and clean-energy programs. Ahead of his trip, the Department of Energy released a report on Wednesday evening detailing the positive economic impact of Recovery Act investments in advanced batteries and electric vehicles, championing the federal government's partnership with the private sector. "For every dollar of the $2.4 billion in seed money provided through the Recovery Act advanced battery and electric vehicle grants," the report says, "the companies have matched it at minimum dollar for dollar."

The same day, Vice President Joe Biden -- who could at this point be officially designated the president's cheerleader summa cum laude on all things Recovery Act-related -- and the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, Christina Romer, released another report, this one detailing the economic impact of the Recovery Act. The report says the stimulus is responsible for "2.5 to 3.6 million -- or about 3 million -- jobs" and again underscores a positive public-private sector partnership. "For every government dollar invested in Recovery Act programs designed to leverage outside capital," the report outlines, "private companies and others are co-investing with nearly three times as much outside investment."

But if the White House has aimed to hang an "Everything's Hunky Dory" sign on its relationship with the private sector and the direction of the economy, the American public doesn't seem to be buying in. In numerous polls released this week, public confidence in the president's handling of the recession is tanking. A CBS poll released Tuesday found that 56 percent of Americans believe the stimulus has had no impact on the economy, while an ABC poll said 6 in 10 Americans lacked confidence in the president to make the right decisions for the country. Yowch (part 2).

Faced with the mounting criticism, Obama called in two of the country's maestros of messaging and money, Buffett and Clinton. Press Secretary Gibbs, however, was quick to explain their presence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. as anything but a coaching session to improve the president's standing in the private sector.

According to Gibbs, it was Buffett who expressed interest in coming to see the president, adding that "you don't turn down the opportunity to talk to Warren Buffett." Gibbs said it was safe to say "they talked about budgets, regulation, taxes, all of those topics." The president also, it should be noted, apparently gave Buffett one of his own ties to replace Buffet's soiled neckwear. (A recession special for Buffett advice? Unclear).

As for Clinton, Gibbs characterized the former president's visit as a meeting to discuss "a Clinton Global Initiative effort at retrofitting large buildings, making them energy efficient, training workers in the skills needed to retrofit and weatherize buildings." (Also in the meeting were chief executives from Bank of America, Honeywell, Centerbridge Partners, Johnson Controls, Hannon Armstrong, and Ameresco.)

When asked whether the president's relationship with the business community was as solid as Clinton's, Gibbs replied: "Yes. Based on the fact that I think we have done a lot to improve the business climate in this country, as evident today by the profit and earnings results that are being released."

For his part, Gibbs was quick to dismiss the Chamber of Commerce attacks as partisan efforts to build GOP steam ahead of this year's midterm elections. "Do I think the Chamber of Commerce is going to spend tens of millions of dollars trying to elect a series of candidates that are different than the candidates that the president is going try to elect?" Gibbs said. "Yes." He then posited, "What's the percentage of money that the Chamber of Commerce donates to Republican candidates on each election cycle? I don't know the number, but my guess [is] that it's above 80 percent."

As to whether the presence of economy swamis Buffett, Clinton and newly named Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jacob Lew would bring better luck to president in his battle to heal the American economy, Gibbs said: "I don't want to leave anybody with the impression that we thought hiring a certain number of people would necessarily bring back the economy. . . . [The] hole is going to take a long time to fill in, and that's what we're working through."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

9 Comments

Filter by:
aminteriors

Even if you gave the president the benefit of the doubt. Saying he saved 3 million jobs with this stimulus. That amounts to $262,333.33 per job saved....?
Im no genius, but would that amount of money have been better spent on creating a small business that has the opportunity to grow, in turn would create more jobs than just saving one messily job?

July 28 2010 at 12:05 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
snrar

President needs Bill Clinton more than ever , His poll numbers falling each day and the economy in the tank . Bill remains strong in the public eyes and his wife poll numbers are strong also . In fact it would not surprise me if she decides to go for the prize of the office of the president if Obama's poll numbers continue to fall.

July 25 2010 at 9:59 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

cjjanis:
When did corprations get a "free ride" we have the highest corporate taxes in the world. Meanwhile your hero warren buffet and bill gates pay ZERO TAXES from their foundations, you really need to live in the REAL WORLD.

July 21 2010 at 3:37 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

cjjanis:
Where are these 3 million new jobs are you still counting the census workers? If obama has created these 3 million new jobs as you claim; then why did obama and the democrats call the need for the unemployment extention an "emergency"?

July 21 2010 at 3:34 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

What connection does bill clinton have with the busines community? He has never had a real job; he is a disbared attorney, who has never stepped into a courtroom other than when he was a defendant.

July 21 2010 at 3:29 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
mrscaptndavid

Funny, but the last I heard from those that personally know Mr. Buffet, our president had not called him once since he got elected. I guess now he finally has called him two years later. Well all I can say is finally! Better late then never. I certainly hope that our president listens to him because this congress and their outrageous spending and the looming cap and trade legislation that nobody wants is very harmful for our country. The debt commision sure paints a gloomy picture and we may already be so far in debt we may be beyond redemption.

July 21 2010 at 2:20 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
punnster

"Comment added successfully?" NOT LIKELY.

July 18 2010 at 12:28 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
punnster

No one seems to get it. The wealth of our nation was built by capitalist industrialists and businesses who provided jobs and taxes. That was how our nation was able to afford the social reforms and conveniences that we have more than any other nation.

July 18 2010 at 12:27 AM Report abuse +8 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to punnster's comment
vivralafrance

then why did they need bailout money ?

July 20 2010 at 11:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sysaphus71

Clinton is a life long political wonk...he has no private experience.....advise worth ....zero. Buffet is for a increase in INCOME TAXES.....However Buffet lives off of DIVIDENDS....taxed at 15% not the 39.5% income tax will be going to.
Warren ...don't pull that fast one on some of us!!! And if you don't think YOU ARE PAYING ENOUGH IN TAXES.....YOU CAN DONATE YOUR FORTUNE TO THE GOVERNMENT!!!!!
I'm sure they will spend it wisely.........NOT!
but do not speak for me!!!

July 16 2010 at 9:37 PM Report abuse +7 rate up rate down Reply
wolfsonnydiane

One should keep in mind that it was the policys of the republicans that created the massive job losses caused the loss off over 13 trillion dollars in the stock market raised our national debt by over 6 trillion dollars and left two wars off the budjet and the cost of their medicare part d off the budget Obama but those cost on our budget and our debt All the while the chamber off comerce was chearing the rebulicans on they in fact helped create this mess were in Dont belive Id listen to them Note Chamber advocates taking jobs over seas

July 15 2010 at 9:38 AM Report abuse -18 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to wolfsonnydiane's comment
joe

Wrong. It was Fannie and Freddie and the proof is that the new financial reform bill still protects Fannie and Freddie from failure. WHY?

July 15 2010 at 6:55 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

.bush wanted Fannie and Freddie investigated in 2004, Congresswoman Waters, on the floor of the House, said no that Reins was doing a great job.

July 17 2010 at 2:50 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>