AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
In an attempt to placate more conservative factions within the church who view such a practice as inconsistent with church doctrine, the archbishop crafted an amendment to allow a new tier of all-male bishops who would look after parishes opposed to female bishops. These so called "flying" bishops (who have never ordained a woman) would have given traditionalists the formal protection they wanted from female ministry. The Archbishop's assurance and direction st York that group go forward in work for women bishops gave evidence of his redirection. Considering his credentials and his willingness to lead the Church of England, I see no reason to encourage his resignation or discourage his noticeable efforts.
July 17 2010 at 10:30 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWomen where never to be in the priesthood. It is not Biblecal!
Lesbeians and Gays are slapping God in the face and being disobedent to God . If they know scripture It will tell them man is not to lay with another man or women on women. Its an obomination to God. If they love God they would not do these thing. So I think its not about what God teaches and says its all about what they want.
How sad this is. Women and gays are worthy to preach the word of God as well. Considering the scandals in the Catholic Church lately, other churches should be willing to make females and gays part of their clergy. You can be sure that they will be under greater scrutiny and are less likely to indulge in scandalous behavior.
July 14 2010 at 2:54 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWelcome Anglicans! Great to have you back in the fold.
A fellow Christian Catholic
I am distressed with the Archbishop's position. Removing a person from consideration is controlling at least part of the election. The electoral process for bishop, requiring votes in the house of laity and the house of clergy would have decided if that area was prepared for an openly gay bishop. God created us male and female, gay and straight. A church that discriminates, in my opinion, does a disservice to God's creatures. I have lttle doubt that the Anglican Communion will split over one or both of these issues (ordained women or ordained homosexuals). Perhaps that is what must be. I will remain where all God's creatures are given equal treatment. Before the comments start being written -- I include those of God's creatures who live a Christ-like life. I do not suggest that the bishopric be open to murderers, pedophiles, etc.
And thank yiou Joran111 for yiour correct Biblical commentary.
Dale, perhaps you are right. However, I think he is too caught up in politics.
It is of my opinion that Archbishop of Canterbury is too caught up in theory rather than dealing with reality of the world today. Women and men are both God's children and in today's culture, at least the industrialized nations place both sexes on an equal basis. We are not living in the same culture as St. Paul. Therefore, we should go back to what Queen Elizabeth 1 wanted when she began the Anglican Church, to unify both Catholic and Protestant worshipers. This is the real Anglican Church. Let's get back to the church we need to be.
July 14 2010 at 11:21 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThere really should be no problem. Jesus Himself made no rule against women in leadership positions, and Paul frequently "shouted out" to women leaders in his letters. So did other writers of letters, as collected in the Bible.
July 14 2010 at 11:10 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyJesus had many women followers but only ordained 12 men. If he had wanted ordained women he could have done it himself.
July 15 2010 at 9:32 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
8 Comments