Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

The Church of England's War Within Over Women Bishops

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
I don't envy the archbishop of Canterbury.

As the titular head of the Anglican communion -- the world's third largest Christian denomination -- Rowan Williams (pictured) has struggled to hold together a church that is fundamentally divided over issues like whether or not to ordain gay priests and female bishops. And if this past weekend is any bellwether of what's to come, he's not going to be able to keep his Communion "communal" for much longer.

The latest showdown among Anglicans took place in the archbishop's own backyard. It was at a meeting of the Church of England's General Synod (a lawmaking body) in the city of York, which began Saturday and ended Tuesday. On the docket was a piece of legislation that has long vexed the Mother Church: one that would allow female bishops to be ordained as early as 2014.

In an attempt to placate more conservative factions within the church who view such a practice as inconsistent with church doctrine, the archbishop crafted an amendment to allow a new tier of all-male bishops who would look after parishes opposed to female bishops. These so called "flying" bishops (who have never ordained a woman) would have given traditionalists the formal protection they wanted from female ministry.

But it didn't work. Though the compromise proposal was approved by a majority of bishops and laity, the clergy -- 40 percent of whom are women -- defeated the measure, 90-85, with five abstentions. (The synod is divided into "houses" of bishops, clergy, and laity, and on big decisions all three must separately supply majorities.) In the end -- after much wrangling and a few highly visible walkouts -- a fragile peace emerged. Both sides accepted that local arrangements should be made for Anglicans wanting to exempt themselves from female leadership. But it will be a code of practice -- not a piece of legislation -- that caters to the sensibilities of those who oppose women. In other words, de facto but not de jure.

The draft legislation allowing for the ordination of women bishops will now wend its way through a deliberative process among the church's 43 dioceses before a final vote is taken in 2012. While it's possible that the proposal could still fail to gain majority approval at the next General Synod, the basic legal premise that women can become bishops is now in place.

So what are we to make of this latest tussle over the future direction of the Anglican communion?

In many ways, the defeat of the compromise legislation was a defeat for Williams himself. And this wasn't the only challenge to his leadership. Earlier in the week, Williams took a priest off of the short list to be bishop of Southwark because of the man's openly gay -- albeit celibate -- relationship with another man. Liberal members of the Church of England castigated Williams for (once again) kowtowing to conservative pressure on social issues. There is now speculation that Williams might step down, although both the British government and the Church of England have denied reports of a briefing paper on how the prime minister should respond in the event that Williams suddenly resigns. (Because the Church of England is the official religion of the United Kingdom -- i.e. there is no separation of church and state -- the prime minister is involved in the appointment process for a new archbishop of Canterbury.)

But the internal divisions on exhibit within the Church of England this week are hardly an isolated incident. The American Episcopal Church has already fragmented over issues like homosexuality and the ordination of women. Traditionalists have broken away and founded their own congregation -- the Anglican Church in North America, which is much more allied with conservative dioceses in Latin America and Africa. The recent ordination of an openly lesbian bishop in Los Angeles is only likely to reinforce these fault lines on a global scale.

There's also the question of how this emerging split within the Anglican communion will affect the Catholic Church. Last year, Pope Benedict XVI announced a plan that would allow Anglicans to join the Catholic Church without renouncing their Anglican traditions and beliefs. More than 1,300 clergy, including 11 serving bishops, wrote to the archbishops of Canterbury and York in 2008 to warn that they would leave the Church of England if they were not given proper provisions when women were made bishops. Only time will tell how credible a threat that was, but these disaffected Anglicans certainly have a viable exit option in the Catholic Church.

Nor are these schisms between progressive and traditionalist factions unique to the Church of England. The Catholic Church itself -- particularly after the bruising debates over the pedophilia scandal -- is riven by all sorts of divisions over the ordination of women and celibacy, among other issues.

And then, finally, there is the simple matter of gender. In a year when much has been made about the triumph of women in politics and the economy, let's not overlook the power and resilience of women in the clergy. At least in the United Kingdom and the United States, these ladies of the cloth have had quite a year as well.

Follow Delia on Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

The Archbishop's assurance and direction st York that group go forward in work for women bishops gave evidence of his redirection. Considering his credentials and his willingness to lead the Church of England, I see no reason to encourage his resignation or discourage his noticeable efforts.

July 17 2010 at 10:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Women where never to be in the priesthood. It is not Biblecal!
Lesbeians and Gays are slapping God in the face and being disobedent to God . If they know scripture It will tell them man is not to lay with another man or women on women. Its an obomination to God. If they love God they would not do these thing. So I think its not about what God teaches and says its all about what they want.

July 15 2010 at 8:56 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

How sad this is. Women and gays are worthy to preach the word of God as well. Considering the scandals in the Catholic Church lately, other churches should be willing to make females and gays part of their clergy. You can be sure that they will be under greater scrutiny and are less likely to indulge in scandalous behavior.

July 14 2010 at 2:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Welcome Anglicans! Great to have you back in the fold.

A fellow Christian Catholic

July 14 2010 at 2:24 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

I am distressed with the Archbishop's position. Removing a person from consideration is controlling at least part of the election. The electoral process for bishop, requiring votes in the house of laity and the house of clergy would have decided if that area was prepared for an openly gay bishop. God created us male and female, gay and straight. A church that discriminates, in my opinion, does a disservice to God's creatures. I have lttle doubt that the Anglican Communion will split over one or both of these issues (ordained women or ordained homosexuals). Perhaps that is what must be. I will remain where all God's creatures are given equal treatment. Before the comments start being written -- I include those of God's creatures who live a Christ-like life. I do not suggest that the bishopric be open to murderers, pedophiles, etc.

And thank yiou Joran111 for yiour correct Biblical commentary.

Dale, perhaps you are right. However, I think he is too caught up in politics.

July 14 2010 at 1:57 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

It is of my opinion that Archbishop of Canterbury is too caught up in theory rather than dealing with reality of the world today. Women and men are both God's children and in today's culture, at least the industrialized nations place both sexes on an equal basis. We are not living in the same culture as St. Paul. Therefore, we should go back to what Queen Elizabeth 1 wanted when she began the Anglican Church, to unify both Catholic and Protestant worshipers. This is the real Anglican Church. Let's get back to the church we need to be.

July 14 2010 at 11:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

There really should be no problem. Jesus Himself made no rule against women in leadership positions, and Paul frequently "shouted out" to women leaders in his letters. So did other writers of letters, as collected in the Bible.

July 14 2010 at 11:10 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to JohnR's comment

Jesus had many women followers but only ordained 12 men. If he had wanted ordained women he could have done it himself.

July 15 2010 at 9:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>