Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Childless? Heck No -- Child Free!

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
I, like my colleague Donna Trussell, have chosen not to have children. But unlike Donna, I abhor the word, "childless," which she uses to describe herself. I am a deliriously happy child-free individual.
The very term, childless, makes one sound something lesser than. The word makes it seem as if every woman over 40 without kids is infertile, forlorn and stares covetously at the local sperm bank. Or maybe she's the type who chases strollers inhabited by Gerber babies just for the chance to coo over a perfect child if only for a mere ten seconds.

I remember as a thirty-something, newly married woman being asked repeatedly by friends or new acquaintances, "Do you have kids?" or "How many kids do you have?" I would respond, "No" or "none" and they would look back with pity in their faces and say, "I'm so sorry." They had noooooooooooo idea what they were saying. I felt like spitting back, "Don't worry, the equipment works just fine, too well in fact, but I just don't want kids." Now I've adopted the humorous approach and respond, "Yes, ten." When they look at me in horror as if I'm a brood mare in disguise, I add (with a twinkle in my eye), "They're all four-legged."

I have high regard for parents today. Social media exposes kids to all kinds of things that make parents groan. The increased competition to succeed in our mushrooming nation (our population has gone from 170 million when I was born to 310 million now) has made it exponentially more difficult to raise a well-adjusted child who will do well in the world than it was a half-century ago. Competition for good schools, good colleges and good jobs is much more intense. So the end result is a double-whammy that increases parents' stress levels while decreasing their ability to juggle work and family life. My heart goes out to them.
I knew from the start I wanted to pour all the energy parents normally spend raising children into making myself become the best person I could be. My first husband called that "selfish." My view: it is selfish in the extreme to bring a child into the world if you are not emotionally, financially and strategically centered, so you can provide that child with a secure launch pad into the game of life. It's not selfish to realize you would not enjoy shepherding a child through childhood and to defer to the plenitudes who want that.
WomanUP's conversation about parenthood or lack thereof was generated by a New York Magazine article entitled "I love my kids. I hate my life." The author's thesis is that studies show adults without children are happier than those with kids. She came to that conclusion after reviewing tomes of studies on the topic. What she adds at the end of the article, however, is that parents' lives are singularly enriched by memories of how difficult child-rearing was. Child-free adults don't have those memories.

It reminded me of the fact that when I attend horse shows (it's my hobby), I'm usually among a handful of women over the age of 30. We're surrounded by hordes of show moms (and some show dads) whose children are riding in the pony and junior divisions. So many of these parents have told me how lucky I am to be able to show myself, because they are no longer fit enough to do so, or they lack the funds, which they must spend on their children's show fees.
Parents may look back and remember the drudgery of dressing up the child so she/he is show-ready, hauling the horse to the show grounds, and enduring the 95-degree or 25-degree temperatures. But they also enjoy the memory of watching the kids have a great time. I, on the other hand, get to measure my improved riding by how well I perform at the show. I learn by my mistakes and figure out what I need to practice for the next show. I take personal glee in my accomplishments, not someone else's. I'll trade my experience and my memories for theirs anytime.
Filed Under: Woman Up, Culture

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

13 Comments

Filter by:
Lizzie

Selfish, my rear end. Selfish is adding more bodies to this planet's burden. Shall we call everyone selfish who doesn't adopt? No one's DNA is special enough that it must be preserved at all costs. I, too, am childFREE. Free to do as I please with my time, money and energy, and free from child-driven noise, illness and messes.

July 20 2010 at 4:13 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Cathy

I, too am child free by choice. Could never figure out why outsiders really Do look at us with pity, and the "so sorry for you" comment. I am truly happy to be in this "pitiful" condition, as it allows freedom galore for my husband and I of 22 years to do what we choose, when we choose, money allowing. I cannot tolerate the thought of being tied down by anything, except for my animals, which I do with total dedication. So, I still have my figure, my freedom and my husband after all this time, and I am happy. So is my husband, who agreed before we got engaged not to have kids.

July 18 2010 at 4:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cynccook

I read this after returning home from visiting my Mother in the nursing home where she is undergoing rehab after a severe stroke. She is still entirely unable to speak and paralyzed on the right side although the stroke happened in early December. In May, she slipped in the bathroom and broke her hip. Since the stroke happened (suddenly, without warning after an ordinary day at her full-time job as a realtor), my sister and I have vigilantly fought to ensure that she received the best care. Because we love her. Because that is what she would do for us. Because that is what family is for. You have no idea how vulnerable someone in her position would be without people to advocate for her. My stepfather, her husband, died in February, but his last moments were comforted (he told us) by his unshaken faith that his beloved, helpless wife would be well cared for by her children. Are we 'burdened' by our Mother? Certainly no more than she was burdened by us. During the months after Mom's stroke, I have been in more hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and rehab centers than I ever cared to see, and do you want to know what's sad? All those helpless elderly women with no one who comes in to make sure that they are okay -- that their prescriptions are accurate, that they are being dressed in the comfortable clothes and not left in the hospital gown all day, that they are getting the diabetic diet, that their wishes are being honored, etc. So, by all means, convince yourself that you are 'happily' child-free, but we all know that reality catches up with all of us eventually, and my husband and I are mindfully raising our four funny, adorable children with that fact in mind. I pity you for all the joy you are missing by not being a parent. I pity you for the fact that your 'heart goes out' to people who are lucky enough to be parents. I pity you for not even realizing how arrogant your dismissal of us sounds. I pity you for the level of mindless self-absorption you have demonstrated, and most of all, I pity the future you lying there alone and helpless in that hospital bed with no children or grandchildren there to point out to the nurse that you haven't had anything for pain in the six hours since you broke your hip.

July 18 2010 at 3:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to cynccook's comment
yesthatislovely

@cynccook - You must realize though that not every child is going to care for their parents and/or ensure that they get the best care. My hubby & I don't want children, but we're preparing for a fruitful retirement. And I love my mother more than anyone, but when it becomes clear that my Mother can't be on her own, I will take care of her, but it won't be a responsibility I chose, not like she chose to have me and have the added stress and responsibility. When you become a parent, you go into knowing (or you should know anyway), the risks and the stress and all work that goes into it. The children don't have a choice.

July 20 2010 at 5:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gawboats

kudos to ya kiddo. im one of those guys whos known to not like kids. not true! i just dont happen to want to have all the grief that friends have with there kids. some kids are great and some not so much in my eyes. i was in business for 30 yrs and had to put up with the parents of those misbehaved kids in my store while i heard from the parents, if you dont quit im gonna. and that was the end of any disipline. i think that attitude was what kept me child free. yeh yeh

July 17 2010 at 9:35 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
lpnx2

I to am a childless happy individual by choice,with absolutely no regrets.

July 16 2010 at 8:58 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
jdaripa9

"... I'll trade my experience and my memories for theirs anytime."
Is this regret?

July 16 2010 at 6:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jdaripa9's comment
jcz78704

No. She's saying she'd rather have the experience of her own accomplishments rather than someone else's (her hypothetical children's) accomplishments. She gets satisfaction ("glee") and gratification from her own enjoyments and her own achievements rather than vicariously through those of children, as many parents do, who thus sacrifice their own personal achievements for those of children. What the author is saying is that she'd take having joy from her own experiences over those of children (if she had had them) any day. So it's the opposite of regret. She's saying she'd much rather be child free. And I absolutely don't blame her. Having children effectively ends your own life in many ways. And then if something bad or really disappointing happens to your children, your life is really over becuase you've put all your "joy" eggs in their basket. Good for her, not having children. The world's overpopulated anyway. I would never bring a child into this world, given its current rotten, precarious, uncertain, unsustainable condition. You've got to be nuts. Taking care of mySELF properly is enough work!

July 16 2010 at 7:56 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Candy

I couldn't agree more, Bonnie. Thanks for the new line (four-legged) I will be sharing with the rude people who react negatively when they're told I am child free!

July 16 2010 at 2:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bonbon

I have one child and I get people always say "only one" I mean they say it everytime, if you don't want any children that's fine, there isn't a thing wrong with it!

July 16 2010 at 12:16 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Susan

I don't know why anyone would think that not having kids is somehow selfish. It's simply a choice like any other. Selfishness, or altruism, are personality traits that have nothing to do with reproduction. Some of the most selfish people I know are mothers who have made their children miserable because of the constant focus on "what I sacrificed" or how much the kids "owe" because of the mere act of giving birth.

I knew at age fifteen that I was not mother material. I planned to never get married and was certainly okay with the prospect. However, I was lucky enough to meet my wonderful male counterpart at a young age. Besides not wanting kids, he is a cat lover like me, so we were a perfect match. After we were married, we were immediately grilled about our "baby plans." When we said there were none, we were viewed with a mixture of curiosity and veiled envy. We were told that we would probably divorce because of the "lack of connection that children provide" -- as if no parents ever divorce!

That was 45 years ago, we're still very happily married while the three couples, with kids, who predicted dire consequences of our childfree lifestyle have all divorced. Kids are not for everyone. The faster people realize it, fewer kids will be born for all the wrong reasons to people who should not be parents.

July 16 2010 at 1:55 AM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to Susan's comment

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners