Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Most Americans Believe Financial Bailout Came During Obama's Term, Poll Finds

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Americans are up on their pop culture, technology and sports knowledge but have a harder time with facts about politics and government, according to a new poll out Thursday.

The Pew Research Center's latest News IQ Quiz finds only about a third of Americans -- 34 percent -- know that the government's bailout of banks and financial institutions was signed into law by President George W. Bush. Fully 47 percent believe incorrectly that the Troubled Asset Relief Program was enacted during President Obama's administration.

The TARP knowledge numbers didn't see much of a disparity among partisan lines, according to Pew:
Notably, just 36% of Republicans, 35% of independents and 34% of Democrats know that the government bailout of banks and financial institutions was signed into law by former President Bush. Democrats (46%) are just as likely as Republicans (50%) or independents (44%) to incorrectly say the legislation was enacted after Obama became president.
Just 28 percent of respondents could identify John Roberts as chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

A majority of 55 percent were able to name Gen. David Petraeus as the top military commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

An overwhelming number of Americans -- 85 percent -- are familiar with Twitter, the internet information-sharing network.

And 63 percent of respondents could identify South Africa as the host of this year's World Cup.

The quiz was conducted July 1-5 among 1,007 adults. It included 11 multiple choice questions about the Gulf oil spill, the unemployment rate, the prime minister of Britain and other people, events and issues in the news. Respondents answered an average of 5.8 questions correctly.

Read the complete results of the Pew survey here.
Filed Under: Poll Watch

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

7 Comments

Filter by:
jazzinheaven

Socrates, 400 years before Christ, stated that the biggest downfall of any democracy was that most voters were ill informed ( or as it could be said: ignorant) about the candidates qualificatons. Therefore, there was a very serious danger to democracy by electing unqualified leaders.
That we had to experience during the previous administration. Not only Bush could not connect two sentences together, ( The lowest Intelligence Quotation or IQ since they began to keep that record ) but He turned this beatiful Country into a "Hamburguer Industry Country" all the manufacturing jobs lost went overseas. His leadership, or lack of it left the financial market in total collapse. Lets remember that his VP and his Secretary of treasury had to go to Congress begging for help. The Country had gone from structurally strong, ( According to Bush ) to the HOUSE IS ON FIRE !!! we need all the money you have to bail out AIG and all the other crook banks that took part in the housing collapse, thanks to deregulation, which started during the Reagan-Bush Daddy administrations ) That brings me to another issue that happened during those 12 years of the Reagan-Bush era. By the way, they presided the colllapse of the Savings and Loan, Which was tied to the housing market, hummm!! Think about it, coincidence, plan or practicing for the future ? Think about it !
That included the following :
1. Financial Institutions holding tax payer or depositors money
2. The dawnfall of the housing market.
3. Bail out of the financial institutions.
4. No bail out for the depositors, or , tax payers. They lost their money !!
Does it sound familiar? What happened to " Believe nothing of what you hear and a little of what you see "
Don't believe what I'm saying, please don't, but, please educate yourself by proving me wrong. Please, do it after you check a few books of HISTORY of the USA. Don't let me take you to the cleaners, as a matter of fact don't let anyone take you to the cleaners. Please Listen, double check, then we could give a well informed opinion. Fron a Disabled Veteran

July 16 2010 at 3:48 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
hairhofla

After reading many of the posts below it only confirms the article above. many "citizens" of America know more about the contestants on American Idol than they do leaders of their own government. It is the DUTY of any citizen..to each other to be informed enough to construct a valid opinion about this country's direction and manner of operation...yet we fail at the one thing we can't afford to do for the sake of future generations...Lately I've heard the word traitor thrown around too much when the truth is we're ALL traitors by not bothering to get informed......
.....................................................................
I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take the power from them, but to inform them by education.
- Thomas Jefferson
..............................................................

An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.

- Plato

July 16 2010 at 12:02 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
drbuckles

What do you expect when 80% of the public hasn't read a book in a year and sits in front of Fox news. They will feel the pain of their ignorance if they keep putting the corporate politicians in office, expecting a different outcome. What's that called, ignorance, or is it stupid, and you can't fix stupid. Fortunately you can go to Thomhartman.com for the wake up call.

July 15 2010 at 11:45 PM Report abuse -12 rate up rate down Reply
andrc657

With talk radio and FOX NEWS spreading so much misinformation it is not surprising that people don't realize it was Bush and the republicans who bailed out Wall Street.

July 15 2010 at 11:38 PM Report abuse -10 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to andrc657's comment
Ruffie

Andra, talk about misinformation.....for your information the bailout of wall street went through a Democrat controlled congress and in fact maybe you aught to check on this but I believe Obama voted "yes" for the bailout. So how cn you say that it was Bush & Republicans that bailed out wall street. Why don't you back that up with a list of who voted "yes" to that bailout.

July 16 2010 at 12:46 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Eric

Reading these posts on these boards for the last few years, this poll is not surprising. Our electorate, while under the impression of being better informed, are becoming less and less so. Far too many people have mistaken punditry and demagoguery for news...we are currently in a sad shape and it has nothing to do with economics, immigration or health care.

July 15 2010 at 10:38 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
forrestoak

Chuck

And what about the huge Bush deficits from 2000 to 2006 BEFORE the democrats took over congress? Yep, get it straight.
------------------------------------------
While republicans had a deficit, you can't compare a deficit of about 160 billion, which was the deficit the last time republicans had full control, to the 1.6 trillion we had last year and this year under complete democrat control.

July 15 2010 at 10:37 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to forrestoak's comment
hairhofla

Since the Iraq war was never included in a Republican Fiscal Budget during the Bush Administration ..that figure of 160 billion deficit is inaccurate and unreliable

July 15 2010 at 11:50 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
forrestoak

While it may not have been passed during his term, it was written by his choice for secretary of the treasury and passed by the democrats in the house and senate. I would say that the democrats should have a large part of ownership of the bill.

July 15 2010 at 10:28 PM Report abuse +12 rate up rate down Reply
Michael

Obama has wrenched his back trying to claim credit for the bailouts he vocally supported while pinning all adverse effects on "the mess he inherited". Let's hope his is not among the jobs "saved or created" by our current congress.

July 15 2010 at 10:11 PM Report abuse +13 rate up rate down Reply
tara*

Actually, it's polling numbers like this that make me not so unhappy about our history of voter apathy, since most people don't know enough to cast a sound vote. Thankfully, the vast majority of those who know more about Twitter than TARP funds have no intention of voting either.

July 15 2010 at 8:41 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
Rebecca

Here is the real truth that you journalists will not comment on! Get it straight or quit your job!

The Washington Post "reported" again today about Obama inheriting a huge deficit from Bush. Amazingly enough,..... a lot of people believe this nonsense. So once more, a short civics lesson.




Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress, and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party. They controlled the budget process for FY 2008 and FY 2009, as well as FY 2010 and FY 2011. In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.




For FY 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the FY 2009 budgets.




And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete FY 2009. Let's remember what the deficits looked like during that period: (below)


If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the FY 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets. If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself.




In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

July 15 2010 at 8:28 PM Report abuse +18 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Rebecca's comment
dc walker

...did you hear last week that they are not preparing a budget for next year!

July 15 2010 at 8:49 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
msgusarmyret77

You need to tell this to all the Republicans in Congress. Not one of them have denied that Obama inherited a budget deficit. The Republicans would make you a honary member of Congress if you could prove your story. You also left out that Bush did an emergeny supplemental budget request for six years to cover the cost of his two wars. Supplemental request don't count against the budget. They go directly to the National Debt. Pres. Obama put the known cost of the war in his budget except for the cost of the additional forces requested by the military.

July 15 2010 at 9:14 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>