AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!I agree 100% that the President's daughters should be left alone by the press and any other type of news and/or publications. It is also my opinion that the President should not make reference to them in his public appearances.
July 29 2010 at 4:38 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyIs this while they are in Spain or Martha Vineyard?
Being so extravagant when American families are having such difficult times just doesn't seem right. I am not just talking O'Bama here but beginning at the top. Is this "do what I say and not as I do!"
Oh, great, when the girls are out doing their jobs more guys for personal protection for them.
July 26 2010 at 9:59 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThe girls are each granted a secret service regardless of whether they babysit or not. The problem is really going to be WHO are they going to babysit? More than likely, due to the security involved, the child(ren) will probably have to come to them. The Obamas may discover that babysitting may not be the practical way for the girls to supplement their allowances. Perhaps "babysitting" may just be a metaphorical way of stating that they just aren't going to be given whatever they want, and that they need to learn. Because they live at the White House, there are somethings that will be off limits to them - such as lemonade stand. I'm sure that their family will brainstorm to come up with a way to help.
July 29 2010 at 3:35 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI hope that if they had boys, they would also offer them babysitting jobs.
July 26 2010 at 7:56 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIs the money they make baby sitting going to be off the books, or is it going to be taxed? What will it cost the taxpayers for extra security ?
July 25 2010 at 2:45 AM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyPresident Obama's daughters need normalcy. Babysitting and being taught the value of the dollar by their parents is good for them to learn as children. I doubt very much it costs us taxpayers any additional money for the Obama's babysitting service. Secret Service Agents are on duty 24/7 using surveillance cameras to keep watch everywhere in the White House; they have always done this in the past for our previous Presidents serving in Office.
July 25 2010 at 1:54 AM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down ReplyIt's a great idea that Pres.& Mrs. Obama want their daughters to get babysitting jobs - it's a great idea to teach them responsibility & they should be earning some money to pay some of their expenses. However who is going to want to have a babysitter for their children who have several Secret Service Agents either inside or outside their homes while the girls babysit. I think it might be a difficult & uncomfortable situation for both the girls & the children they are babysitting.
Evie Glodic
Although these girls will be accompanied by the secret service, I believe they are way too young to be babysitting. I would not trust my kids to a 9 or I2 yr. old, secret service or not. I also don't believe for one minute that President Obama would allow his girls to babysit at such a young age. Everything he does is calculated and cunning. There is a point behind this article hidden somewhere, and it isn't babysitting. Perhaps he is beginning to realize that we are so far in debt that we are going to have to start employing our children at a much younger age, so he can find some other means to pay back the huge debt that he has incured. The majority of the people in this nation are so broke, many have lost their homes, their jobs, yet it appears that he is squeezing the middle class so tightly that there is massive depression going on in our country. God help us.
July 24 2010 at 9:14 AM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyI really don't think President Obama is advertising that his kids are going to be babysitters. I think that "babysitting" is a metaphor for whatever they come up with for their own money. 9 is too young, but 12 is not - although it does depend on the child. When I was 12, I babysat 3 kids for the whole summer every day while their mother worked. Would have been a better summer but the middle kid was a difficult child. Even so, I dealt with him, and we all survived. His main point is that he wants his kids to understand that they need to not have everything given to them - even if they have the money.
July 29 2010 at 3:41 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIm so glad Obama can find time and money for Vacations when the normal American family is suffering so much. I think Obama has had all of this fame go to his head and I think he is un in touch.
July 23 2010 at 9:53 PM Report abuse Permalink +33 rate up rate down ReplyLets see if I have this correct. Each of his Daughter's will be accompanied by at least 2 Secret Service Agents at a cost of how much per job just so they can earn 40-50 bucks, maybe? How much sense does this make for the taxpayer who will be footing the bill? Well it makes no sense at all. Why should we, the taxpayer, foot the Thousands of Dollars this will cost just so his Daughters can earn a few dozens of Dollars. This man has no concept of how economics works. All he is capable of is wasting the Taxpayer's money.
July 23 2010 at 9:50 PM Report abuse Permalink +34 rate up rate down ReplyThe president's kids should be able to live a normal life. They shouldn't be imprisoned in the White House because it costs the taxpayers money to let them out. The secret service has to follow no matter where they go, why does it matter to you whether it is to do some babysitting or to go hang out with their friends at the movies?
July 25 2010 at 12:20 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
71 Comments