AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
"He's been traveling the country for the past few months, but a lot of people outside of Minnesota don't know him, including some members of the Washington Press corps. This is a fun way for him to share his story and his vision for 2010 and answer press questions," Conant said.I'm here in MN, and with Tim Pawlenty, you get Pawlenty of NOTHING when it comes to governing! You would get Pawlenty of tax cuts for the wealthy bringing us Pawlenty more debt, bringing us into depression, and probably bankruptcy! More interstate freeways would collapse, just as our I35W did, as less and less money is spent on any infrastructure in this country. There'd be no badly needed investment in anything, including education, new energy technology. The progress Obama brought to the healthcare system would be reversed, and millions would lose healthcare, and costs would skyrocket, while companies drop coverage completely. Social programs, even ones that everybody loves, would collapse and be dismantled. This includes social security and Medicare. This country would go to the ash heap of history
July 28 2010 at 12:16 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyRomney and Jinhdal in 2010. Please stay home Governor Tim
July 25 2010 at 10:24 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down ReplyThere is so much effort to position oneself in American politics to run for the Presidency or even State seats that we see as in this article that the Governor is working now to possibly get elected to a job that will not have an "opening" for more than 2 years. The time and money spent in this manner is mind-boggling to people from other countries. I work with British Nationals. When Gordon Brown decided to step down, he announced he was dissolving Parliment, and there would be an election to choose his successor...IN 30 DAYS!!...the funny thing is...in that short period of time, the British people were introduced or re-introduced to the candidates who wanted to run for the Prime Minister's job or to run for the Member of Parliment jobs of representing their local constituents and lo and behold, the election took place...one would assume the people elected reflected the choices of the electorate and the only loosers were the media/advertising organizations that did not reap millions and millions of pounds in pre-election run up campaigns like those in America do. The up-side for the British people was that sitting politicians, with such short notice focused on getting their message across, but did not have time for back-door/behind-closed-doors "deals" giving other politicians and voters "bribes" to buy their votes. I was taught "keep it simple" (even if this comment appears very long-winded). Why can't American elections be short and sweet? Any voter who, when presented with the facts by a candidate over a 30 day period, says he/she didn't have time or enough input to make a rational decision is really saying there was not enough time for my city/my group to receive bribe offers, or they are so dim-witted that they don't deserve the right to vote.
July 25 2010 at 10:21 PM Report abuse Permalink +22 rate up rate down ReplyI for one, completely agree with you, Now how do we do it?
July 26 2010 at 3:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyAnother right wing extremest that wants his relegious views be mine.. NO THANKS
July 25 2010 at 10:15 PM Report abuse Permalink -7 rate up rate down ReplyHey everyone who now misses Bush give me a thumbs up!!!!!
July 25 2010 at 10:06 PM Report abuse Permalink +13 rate up rate down ReplyI have not quite got over the banks collapesing, war with the wrong country, stocks crashed, housing market busted, still no jobs created, tax releive for the rich, started with a balance budget and look where we were after he left. No Thanks, I do not miss him, never will
July 26 2010 at 3:49 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyPawlenty in 2012!!!!!!!
July 25 2010 at 10:06 PM Report abuse Permalink -27 rate up rate down ReplyWell, Obama ran on a platform for "Change" -- and he made good on his word -- because plenty has changed for people who were employed before he was elected -- and now they only have "loose change" left in their pockets.
I, for one, am tired of hearing Obama, Pelosi, and Reid continue to blame Bush for the current state of affairs. You told us two years ago you would change things for the better -- and so far you have only made them worse.
With the authority to make things happen comes the responsibility of accepting the consequences. Grow up and accept the responsibility for your actions to date and focus on making things better for this country.
Newt is the only real solution. He is the only one smart enough to bring us back from Obama the way Reagan did from Carter. Only Obama is turning out to be far worse than Carter.....
July 25 2010 at 8:47 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyI agree wholeheartedly. The problem with most politicians is that they never read history. Newt is a former history professor and has written numerous books on the subject. Big government never worked in the past, and it will not work now. Newt understands that. It is unfortunate that Obama does not see that.
July 25 2010 at 9:03 PM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down ReplySo, another who thinks that Reagan was "great" Was he really? Did you know when Reagan took office the deficit was about 950 BILLION dollars, and when he left, with two recessions behind him and a massive tax cut for the rich, this president, the worst enemy of labor we ever had, left us with a deficit of2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS----even Jimmy Carter did not do that
The only thing that Reagan accomplished, besides being the president of the rich and the corporations, was being the most over-rated president this country has ever had
Just what we need Bush!
PLAY BY DAY.
Our Planet needs to be at 350 Parts per million CO2. To survive
We are at 392.04.
NOAA said this is the hottest land and ocean temp since they have been recording.
Republicans have stopped all attempts to control Pollution.
I say PLAY BY DAY We can cut back on heavy CO2 If we can cut back 50% of all night games.
Support Big oil or the Democratic party!
It is not just a matter of big oil or the Democratic party. At this point in time, there are no economically viable alternatives to oil and coal. What would you suggest we do? Go back to burning candles, and riding around in horse and buggies? All the democratic party wants to do is implement a cap and trade program that will generate billions in revenue for the government and drive utility costs through the roof. If you haven't noticed, we are just starting to crawl out of a recession. With the Bush tax cuts set to expire at the end of the year, and new taxes being added as a result of Obamacare, the last thing the American people need is higher energy costs. The government should provide tax incentives for private industry to develop oil alternatives, and the government needs to streamline regulations to allow construction of more nuclear power plants. There has not been one built in more than 35 years !! France generates 98% of its electricity from nuclear power and there has been no Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. This is not an all or nothing game. There are other options. Let's get a little more realistic here !!
July 25 2010 at 8:43 PM Report abuse Permalink +19 rate up rate down ReplyWe need to change the " JOB DESCRIPTION " Candidates should be asked prior to " WOULD YOU WORK FOR $ 1.00 PER YEAR " if our economy is not improving , same was asked GMs / CHRYSLERs CEOs by our spend thrift SENATORS ?
Would you accept SOCIAL SECURITY / MEDICARE as your PENSION / MEDICAL BENEFITS as PRESIDENT if elected ?
WOULD YOU WAIVE YOUR FEDERAL PENSION PLAN IN LIEU OF SOCIAL SECURITY ?
WOULD YOU TRAVEL ON CIVILIAN CARRIERS IN LIEU OF AIR FARCE ONE , UTILIZING FREQUENT FLIER MILES to cut back on TRAVEL COST PAID BY TAXPAYERS ?
All else is useless as we all know the promise us the MOON and after they are in OFFICE THE LEAD US INTO DOOM .
There is a much better solution: Term Limits ! We need to get rid of the career politicians. Congressmen should be limited to 2 terms or 4 years, and senators to 1 term or 6 years. This gives them insufficient time to develop cozy relationships with lobbyists and they would be spending their time taking care of the nation's business instead of raising cash for the next election, and taking care of the special interests that give them all that cash. Given the short period of time they are in office, they do not need pensions either. As we have seen, past presidents seem to do quite well after they leave office with multi million dollar book deals and earning $100,000 for every speech they give. Why should the taxpayer continue to subsidize them ??
If you want REAL change in this country, vote for the non-encumbent. If it is an open seat, vote for the candidate who is NOT a career politican. That is CHANGE you can believe in !!!
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
21 Comments