Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Supreme Court under John Roberts 'Most Conservative' in Recent History

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The Supreme Court during its last five years under Chief Justice John Roberts has become "the most conservative one in living memory," but the shift is due less than to Roberts than Justice Samuel Alito who took the place of Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006 after she retired from the bench, according to the New York Times.

The Times said that best on its analysis of a range of political science data that if the court continues on its current course it is likely to "allow a greater role for religion in public life, to permit more participation by unions and corporations in elections and to elaborate further on the scope of the Second Amendment's right to bear arms."

Other actions that might be expected are curtailing abortion rights, affirmative action and protections for people accused of crimes, the Times said.

Samuel AlitoGoing by the Times' analysis which coded court decisions and votes by justices going back to as far as 1937, the Roberts court issued conservative decision 58 percent of the time, a number that peaked at 65 percent during the last term, which was the highest percentage since any year since 1953.

The biggest factor was the appointment of Samuel Alito who was named by former President Bush to take the place of O'Connor who had been a swing vote, and a decisive one in a 2003 decision on restricting corporate campaign spending that was largely nullified by the current court.
Filed Under: Law, Supreme Court

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

17 Comments

Filter by:
nhsiii

With a little good fortune and some thoughtful appointments to the Court, this Court will have seen its most conservative years as bygone years. Good riddance !

July 25 2010 at 10:17 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Levi W. Swank

While the label "conservative" may apply, I think Liptak misses the subtleties of Supreme Court opinions. While the results may be "conservative", most of these opinions have been very narrow. PCAOB v. Free Enterprise Fund, for instance, did not invalidate any rulings by the PCAOB. It only said the structure by which boar members are appointed and retain their position on the board must be changed. Further analysis of individual cases relating to this article can be found here: http://bit.ly/cNAj4X

July 25 2010 at 9:51 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
rosemary

i want to see a change in the SC. More liberals. That way everything will be fairer.

July 25 2010 at 2:27 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply
S321Saint

It would be interesting to hear data from the other side of the issue and how they would term it. Let me guess...the activist judges and decisions would be termed "progressive" or simply judges...and the decisions was be termed decisions, not liberal, not left wing, etc. Notice that the "problem" areas of the "conservative" court are all liberal issues that only 20-30% of people agree with. And notice that they term it as being a "problem", and reading btwn the lines, say that they are worried that even more "conservative" ideas will be enabled....horrors!!!!!

July 25 2010 at 2:14 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
rick

Thanks God for Roberts and Alito. Maybe they will help keep this administration in line, or at least in check.

July 25 2010 at 1:45 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
Big John

Can anyone explain why a conserative state has not banned abortion? If there was ever a time to overturn Roe vs Wade now is the time. Republicans have been using this platform since Nixon but have done nothing to overturn it. It is not up to the president or congress to take action. A state must ban it and then it goes to the supreme court. WHAT OUR YOU WAITING FOR????

July 25 2010 at 1:43 PM Report abuse -14 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Big John's comment
Tom

Most states are advanced enough to realize that the choice of abortion is that of the woman alone. She has a constitutional amendment to protect her from your religious or moral views!

July 25 2010 at 1:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Charlie

Yep, those right wing activate justice's who forced king george on us are doing their best to bring back the bad old days when slaves were held, women could not vote, and the Kristen right were able to force their beliefs on everyone!

July 25 2010 at 1:38 PM Report abuse -17 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

Of course obama dosen't like the constitution or bill of rights because it dosen't tell him what power he has; it tells him what power he dosen't have. The liberals love to cherry pick the constitution and the bill of rights; like the 1st amendment they hide behind that skirt all the time, but don't want corporations to be allowed free speech to campaign for canidates? Better yet the 2nd amendment couldn't be more clear; but they want to try to ban guns time and time again.

July 25 2010 at 1:36 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to tnickerson08's comment
tausands

When did a corporation become a person? Giving a business the rights of an individual basically nullifies the rights of many of the people working for that corporation. Would you like it if your company donated money to and adveertised for Obama? Oh, who's trying to ban guns? There has not been one piece of legislation presented that would ban guns, in fact when right-wing whackos wandered around Obama's town hall meetings with guns, they were not even harrassed...unlike peaceful protestors that were herded into pens by the Bush administration.

July 25 2010 at 10:29 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
boosethomas7

if the supreme court were to actually do its job without fear of whitehouse and secret service put over their heads by any president they would actually stand-up for the american people and our constitutinal rights was thats what i said these are rights not privliges its elf explanatory RIGHTS they have become high above the american people and above their own laws none of this is about us the american people its about the nice cushy retirement promised from OUR tax dollar

July 25 2010 at 1:06 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to boosethomas7's comment
crabbychief

Fear of the white house and secret service...Okaaay...but enough about whatever political crime thriller novel you were reading, lets talk about reality.

The reality is, you need a lesson in civics and government...oh, and english.

July 25 2010 at 1:19 PM Report abuse +13 rate up rate down Reply
Eric

While it is going to take we Americans quite some time to dig out of the economic, political and, yes, moral hole the conservative policies of the last 30 years has dug us, it is going to be the conservative Supreme Court and all the harm it will do that is going to haunt Americans for generations.

July 25 2010 at 12:28 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>