AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
As she struggled to pull together her general election campaign after the hotly-contested GOP nomination fight, Angle raised $2.6 million last quarter -- compared to $2.4 million for the better-funded Reid -- which enabled her to air two ads, one of which hit hard at Reid for the state of Nevada's economy in which unemployment has reached 14.2 percent, the Journal-Review said.I fail to see how you could draw the conclusion that Senator Reid was closing the gap on front runner Sharron Angel. I live in Las Vegas, and nobody but nobody has asked my opinion of who I thought would be the best representative for Nevada. If you're lucky, you might witness a Senate Majority Leader from the state in which you reside. Do you honestly think I'm going to cast my vote to inexperience, and comments which boggle the mind? I don't think so...
Senator Reid continues to have my vote...
To all those questions such as " why would anyone in NV vote for Harry Reid again", or to the statment that "Harry Reid polling is lower than congress." I have one answer, Sharron Angle! This lady was,and is a political gift to Harry Reid. Once folks in NV get to know her he will win. And I'm sure he will happily "introduce the real Sharon Angle" to NV voters.
August 02 2010 at 5:29 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyIn responce to wrmelton7 who wrote: "You need to re-read your history. Every President that lowered taxes ended up lowering the deficet." This is categorically and demonstratively wrong! Presidnet Reagan lowered taxes and the deficet increased substancially! The same thing happened after GWB lowered taxes in 2002. Mr Bush added over 1 Trillion dollars in 8 years to the national debt. We went from a budget surplus back to a deficet within 6 months of Bush's budget being approved with his tax cuts!
August 02 2010 at 1:09 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyHarry reid polling is lower then congress
August 01 2010 at 8:37 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyWhy would anyone in nevada vote for Reid again.
August 01 2010 at 8:33 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyI could give you one very simple response - Sharron Angel. To bad you don't get it...
August 07 2010 at 5:34 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyit will be the republicans waterloo if they take over congress .the main reason they will be expected to fullfill their campain promises of lower taxes lower deficet and lower unemploynmentall in less than two years.It will be fun to watch repubs try and lowere the deficet while cutting taxes
August 01 2010 at 11:28 AM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyYou need to re-read your history. Every President that lowered taxes ended up lowering the deficet.
August 01 2010 at 1:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyWhen is she going to agree to have a debate with Reid? If she refuses than you know she can only critize Reid but can she say what she will do for Nevada, other than not bring in jobs or privatize Social Security and Medicare, and make Nevada our nuclear dumping ground?
August 01 2010 at 2:08 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyThose who think Yucca Mnt could have created thousands of job, but in the same token it could cause millions of lives.
Harry Reid is saving the best for the last. Why show his cards now and give Angle a chance to change her venue again like she did when she first campaigned against Sue Lowden. When the rhetoric of her campaign showed her losing, she toned down and started to deny saying she said this or that. No problem, she's going to lose at the end.
Harry reid has opposed Yucca Mnt, which would create thousands of jobs; if you use obama's formula on "jobs created or saved" Yucca Mnt would create a million jobs.
July 31 2010 at 4:30 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyDidn't harry reid say that loosing 35,000 jobs was great news? Of course the media gave him a do-over to explain his comment. Sharron Angle said that we should privatize Social Security; although does anyone think Social Security will be there when you retire, think again.
July 31 2010 at 4:25 PM Report abuse Permalink +13 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners





Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
32 Comments