AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
It was a rare chance for the president to bask in some positive economic news: following his administration's $60 billion bailout of the troubled U.S. car industry, all "Big Three" companies -- Ford, Chrysler and GM -- are in turnaround. It was a welcome respite for the White House, which had to contend the same day with the urelease of second quarter economic figres showing anemic GNP growth of only 2.4 percent -- the lowest in a year. Obama briefly addressed the figures, and pointed to the silver lining, saying "Our economy has been growing instead of shrinking." To all you Obama bashers and Bush lovers out there. Even when Obama saves or creates jobs you are still whining and want to go back to the good old days og the total failure known as the Bush administration
Yes, and no matter what the Republican BS puts out, Obama saved MILLIONS of jobs with his stimulus plan, probably including many of the whining complainers.
You whiners who complain that Obama is not creating jobs fast enough----do you not realiz4e that it takes a long time to reverse the serious damage doe by the Bush administration
If Obama figures are not good enough, go over these MINUS unemployment numbers from the Bush years-----remember, these are all MINUS
200,000, then 300,000, then 400,000 then 600,000 and MINUS on and on until the figure reached, from when the Bush Great Recession began in 2007, a grand total of MINUS 8 MILLION jobs. Want Obama to fix that in a short time? NO ONE CAN
Most people felt that GM and Chrysler should have been allowed to file for bankruptcy and then re-organize. Had this been done it wouldn't have cost the taxpayers a dime. But the labor unions jobs and retirement plans would have taken a serious hit along with their salaries. Smart people know that Obama's actions were to save the labor unions by pumping stimulus funds into GM and Chrysler. He just threw money at the problem and hoped it worked.
July 30 2010 at 3:55 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplySeems I remember Bush throwing a little money at GM and Chrysler as well!
July 30 2010 at 7:58 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyYeah, Bush gave the money freely. The money Obama has given has to be paid back and with interest, and is.
August 03 2010 at 1:17 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI belive GM and Chrylser still owe the US Taxpayers 65 billion dollars loaned to them so when they repay it I'll consider them viable. Ford which did not take any Obama dollars is doing much better. And to think so much was made of the "Mission accomplished" banner during the Bush Admininistration.
July 30 2010 at 3:53 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyBasically- FORD should sue the Federal Government... The protections that were afforded GM were a total competitive advantage, and violated every commerce law out there. I'm not pro-US auto, but I've come to appreciate how Ford came through things-- good old U.S. ingenuity and Savvy!
GO FORD - bury Obama motors...
The ONLY reason Ford did not take the bailout money was because they took out HUGE loans before the market collapsed ,had they not you can bet they would have had their hand out as well!!!
July 30 2010 at 3:45 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down ReplyYeah, watched his "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" speech. You have to admit that he is a great speaker even if inept president.
July 30 2010 at 1:59 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down ReplyHopefully bemod, you did not have any money lost when Obama circumvented the rule of law and forced the secured creditors and shareholders of GM and Chrysler to take a haircut and allowed the unions to steal equity positions in these companies. I, as a lifetime Chrysler owner, will now never buy another Chrysler product nor a GM product again.
July 30 2010 at 3:52 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
6 Comments