AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!every state in the union should file suit against the federal government for their illegal passage of the health care bill. our constitution does not provide government the right or privilege to mandate health care for its citizens and providing for penalties to those persons who do not conform. it's illegal and communist and this administration needs a loud wake up call. everyone should inundate their respective state governers to promptly obtain the vote needed to approve the expenditure of a lawsuit against the obama administration
August 06 2010 at 2:44 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Replyno matter what your feelings are you have an obligation to follow Federal law..you cannot circumvent it to meet your own wishes
August 05 2010 at 7:46 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyOk, I found it. 667,680 people voted for Proposition C. There are 4,205,774 registered voters in Missouri. Therefore, 16% of the registered voters of Missouri voted for Proposition C rejecting a key element of the healthcare plan. What does everyone think? Is 16% pro Propositon C a landslide? It's hard for me to imagine that 16% of the registered voters truly represents the thoughts of the state, one reason we need to be careful about referendum style voting as referendums don't always represent the true wishes of the people. Can't our news reporters do some of the math?
August 04 2010 at 6:23 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyA true leader would have worked for a bipartisan bill but Obama would rather push a bill through that has many loopholes and problems instead of doing something thats right for all Americans. Then he claims to be the uniter... this guy is a colossal failure. Good for Missouri!!
August 04 2010 at 1:14 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplySadly, the republicans refused to work with the democrats in crafting health care reform. They did nothing but obstruct and remained the party of NO even on measures they had originally suggested.
August 04 2010 at 1:28 PM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down Replyandrc657...its kind of hard to obstruct when their vote does not even matter which is why the obstruction came from democrats. And if you want to base your information on cliches such as the party of NO you have been sold a bill of goods. Here's why; Every democrat that spoke on the house floor the day health care passed they spoke about "no more dropping because of pre-existing conditions". For the record, 27 republican senators and 121 republican congressmen were for regulation of companies "dropping because of pre-existing conditions". If you did your research you would know they said NO to the socialization and government takeover of health care.
August 04 2010 at 2:03 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyWhy doesnt Obama just drop this health care bill already? It seems like most of the people do not want it. What is wrong with him ? He will never get re-elected.
August 04 2010 at 1:08 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyHow many people have read the health care bill now that its been out over six months? I don't think many. How do they feel about the health care czar and his/her staff in every state with access to all our records deciding how many hospitals, doctors, nurses, etc. we need. How much money they can spend and who they can allocate it to.
August 04 2010 at 1:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyThe health care reform law has been really good for our seniors on medicare. They should begin to see a lot of savings especially with prescription drugs.
August 04 2010 at 1:00 PM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down ReplyJust curious. Could someone from Missouri inform us as to the percentage of Missouri voters who actually showed up at the poles? I am reminded that the framers of the Constitution chose a representative government over a referendum style government.
From what I read on health insurance costs, if everyone does not participate, then well people will not participate and only the seriously ill with pre-existing conditions will seek the coverage. In such case, the cost becomes prohibitive in a private setting. With many of my relatives not presently covered at all by any health insurance plan, I am having trouble understanding how it is different to be made to purchase car insurance versus health insurance. Also, what happens when the presently well person develops a critical healthcare issue? It just makes sense that we should all get coverage.
I keep remembering that now the US pays more than any other industrialized nation for healthcare which in turn covers the fewest people. Could we be paying a high price for little coverage with no better outcomes than the rest of the world? Something must change! Did the Republicans ever propose changes to the healthcare system that would cover 30 million people?
Just curous in Indiana.
Follow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
16 Comments