Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Obama Urges House Passage of Teacher Jobs Bill, Criticizes Republican Resistance

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
President Obama has urged the House to pass a $26 billion jobs bill that the president will save 160,000 teaching positions across the country. The measure has already gained passage in the Senate, passing by a margin of 61-39, with two Republican senators, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, both of Maine, joining Democrats in support. House members have returned from their August recess to hold a special session to vote on the bill.

In a statement issued in the White House Rose Garden, the president said the bill would prevent the layoff of not only educators but essential state employees, including "police officers, firefighters, nurses and first responders." Focusing on the effect that state budget cuts have had on teachers specifically, Obama was flanked by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and two teachers -- Shannon Lewis of West Virginia and Rachel Martin of Illinois -- who have been laid off. Both stand to be re-hired if the measure becomes law. Should the House fail to pass the bill, the president warned, it would "take us backwards in a time when we need to keep this country moving forward."

Obama highlighted the fact that funding for the bill was in part created "by closing tax loopholes that encourage corporations to ship American jobs overseas -- so it will not add to our deficit." He declared the bill "should not be a partisan issue" but noted that House Minority Leader John Boehner had called the legislation a "special interest" bill. Obama responded, "I suppose if America's children and the safety of our communities are your special interest, then it is a special interest bill." He later added that the challenge facing parents and others across the country should not be "a Democratic problem or a Republican problem -- it is an American problem."




Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

11 Comments

Filter by:
jtzeph

cjjanis and jblack: Have either of you taken even a rudimentary economics class? Govt. stimulus in the public sector is WORTHLESS. There is no synergy whatsoever to personnel investments made for political reasons. On what basis have you determined these layoffs are not completely justified, either for fiscal reasons or simply overstaffing. Govt. employment is up 8% since this recession hit. This monstrosity that has perpetuated and fed itself off the tax revenues produced in the private sector is in the last throes of irrelevance. Look at New Jersey, that is the future.

August 10 2010 at 6:05 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
catalogsplus

gee, I wonder what the unions will spend this multi-billion dollar payoff on this time. New offices? New cars? More executive raises?

August 10 2010 at 5:20 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
jtzeph

This is just more welfare for govt. employees. The vast majority of the stimulus was nothing more than pay-offs to the govt. unions and profligate states. This administration knows NOTHING about the private sector and the real economic growth that lifts ALL of the economy. One of Obama's initial proclamations to young people urged them to forego private sector employment to work in the wasteland of government. This tells you all you need to know about the current 5 year plan the Democrats are pushing. November will will chop off the last year.

August 10 2010 at 4:15 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
pigboy1967

Personally I don't want my tax dollars going to bail out states. If we start doing this the states will never become responsible in their spending. They need to cut employees anyway so this (not passing this bill) will get them started.
I hate to think I'm bailing out California.

August 10 2010 at 2:14 PM Report abuse +12 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to pigboy1967's comment
bpdarling

personally you probably don't pay any Federal taxes anyway based on your income, if you even have a job. What are you complaining about?

August 10 2010 at 3:24 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
mojobujak

BPDARLING - Sarah Palin is not on any public payroll, so she cannot be layed off. It's the PRIVATE SECTOR that are willingly putting millions more in her personal bank account. What a concept to nanny state proponents.

August 10 2010 at 4:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
wigl545

I spent 18 years of my working career as a manager in a union environment. I stated then and it's even more accurate now, in my opinion, that..."never before have so many been paid so much for doing so little" and I included myself in that statement.

Unions originally were good for the worker. Then greed took over and American labor forced the off-shore out-sourcing of America's jobs due to the necessity of earning an institutional profit order to remain operational. I never understood why anyone would, or should, pay any entity for the right to work, but that's just my opinion.

LEW

August 10 2010 at 1:10 PM Report abuse +16 rate up rate down Reply
jrb359

Why not take this money from the leftover job stimulus bill that did nothing. Or better yet, how about cutting back on superintendents salaries and getting rid of unnessary administrators? No, let's just keep adding to the deficit and pay back the obligation to the big unions. Again, more rewarding by this administration for poor decision making.

August 10 2010 at 12:52 PM Report abuse +16 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to jrb359's comment
ettu

To expound on your mention of school administrators, we have a school district in Illinois where the Administrator is about to retire. He presently makes $305,000 annually. According to actuary tables, the taxpayers will be on the hook for $9,000,000 for pension and health benefits for just this ONE person. Those government employees surely do know how to take care of themselves first.

August 10 2010 at 1:56 PM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
bpdarling

ANSWER: The stimulus IS working. You can't correct the out of control spending from 8 years of the BUSH administration in 18 months. BUSH took a HUGE surplus in 2000 to a HUGE defecit in 2008. You seem not to remember that.

August 10 2010 at 3:17 PM Report abuse -9 rate up rate down Reply
Kenneth

The bill is not the problem. What other bills are trying to get a free ride? What pork is attached? How is it being funded stimulus money or more print and spend? This is what causes people to vote no. It is call irresponsible government!

August 10 2010 at 12:44 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Kenneth's comment
bpdarling

The republican tea party does not like this bill because it STOPS big business from shipping MORE of our jobs overseas. The republicans get most of their campaign financing frmo these BIG BUSINESS companies, so they always protect BIG BUSINESS, usually at the expense of the American Taxpayer. That is what is happening. FORTUNATELY, America has voted Democratic majorities, so now the PEOPLE are taking back this country from BIG BUSINESS and INSURANCE companies. Change is in the air, and it is working to benefit ALL Americans, not just the rich Republican ones.

August 10 2010 at 3:28 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply
rann948

Sometimes layoffs are necessary to get back on track. Pumping money into a pit is not going to solve our problems. Keep the tax cuts, encourage business by assuring them that they will not be devastated by cap & trade or so called "health care reform", and jobs will come back and the taxes that they bring will heal us.

August 10 2010 at 12:39 PM Report abuse +17 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to rann948's comment
ushdrider

Then why can't we layoff some fed workers instead of giving them raizes every year when the rest of us in the real WORLD get cuts every year? We need a NEW employer for the FEDS so the new company can cut the FEDS wages like our get cut when someone new takes over - Right?

August 10 2010 at 1:33 PM Report abuse +12 rate up rate down Reply
bpdarling

Great idea, let's lay off Sarah Palin. The Republican Tea Party would be much better served to spend their money to CREATE JOBS, and NOT just put more millions in Sarah's personal bank account. Have a nice day.

August 10 2010 at 3:29 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>