Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

What Reagan Had and Obama Needs: Optimistic Slogans

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Anyone writing about abortion knows how hard it is to find the right label to identify each side's position. Those who support reproductive rights call themselves pro-choice, but in a recent post, when I identified pro-life anti-abortion advocates as anti-choice, a colleague told me she found the term offensive. I can see her point. Pro-choicers don't like to be called anti-life, which would be the flip side of the phrase I had used as a matter of convenience, as opposed to ideology. So I changed my labeling system, but not everyone got the memo, as they say.
A popular bumper sticker says, "It's a child, not a choice," which can fairly be summed up as an anti-choice position. And Feminists for Life, where Jane Roberts, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts, does pro-bono legal work and served on the board, uses the trademarked slogan, REFUSE TO CHOOSE. Either there's a touch of hypocrisy at work here, or to put it another way, "It's not what you say, it's what people hear."
That's the subtitle of Republican pollster Frank Luntz' book, "Words that Work." Luntz made his reputation advising Newt Gingrich and other GOP leaders on how to frame policies in appealing language, such as calling the estate tax "the death tax," implying that everyone is unfairly punished by the government for dying.
Kelly McDonald, a professor of communications at Arizona State University, uses the book in his classes. Emotionally charged language motivates people to act, "so slogans become ways to motivate the ideologically aligned or to push the ideologically neutral to act," says McDonald. He cites among the most successful President Reagan's '84 campaign slogan, "Morning in America," and the way he re-branded a weapon of war, the MX Missile, as "the peacekeeper." Barack Obama's "hope and change" slogan during the 2008 campaign built on what Reagan did, and brought hundreds of thousands of new voters to the polls.
McDonald says Obama could use more Reaganisms to convey a sense of optimism and conviction if he hopes to get voters to "stay the course" as they did with Reagan in 1982. Reagan faced a difficult midterm election with unemployment at 10.8 percent, and an approval rating of 42 percent, numbers much like those of Obama's today. Republicans lost 28 House seats that November, but held their own in the Senate, an outcome that in retrospect looks positively rosy given the gloomy forecasts that Obama is likely to experience.
Obama has so far failed to come up with a memorable slogan that could rally voters to come out and support Democrats this November like they did in '08. He seems to have a reflexive disdain for the packaging that has become such an important part of politics, almost as though he's above it. If he's to persuade voters, he's got to do a better job of connecting with their emotions. It's not enough to outline rational responses to difficult problems when the other side is waiting to pounce.
The November elections will be decided most pivotally on economic issues, but hot-button topics like abortion, immigration, gay marriage and gun rights will also be on people's minds. The California judge who overturned Proposition 8, California's ban on gay marriage, practically ensured the measure will go before the Supreme Court, which could be why opposition from the Right was remarkably measured. This battle over gay marriage is long from over.
The political hot buttons in this election touch on the overarching theme of government power that is roiling the electorate. Conservatives are popularizing the phrase "anchor babies" to inflame a debate about the right to citizenship of children born to illegal immigrants on American soil. McDonald is living and breathing these issues as a college professor in Arizona, epicenter of the debate over illegal immigration. He points out that the architect of the law that ignited the controversy, a state senator, wants to be seen as anti-illegal immigration without being anti-immigrant. It's a distinction that gets lost in the cable-news face-offs, but judging by the polls, the American people seem comfortable with the ambiguity. By almost two-to-one, they support the Arizona law, yet at the same time a substantial majority also supports comprehensive reform that would include a path to citizenship for the twelve million illegal immigrants already in the country.
Arizona is also the center of what could be called gun anxiety. Even though Obama supports gun rights and has done nothing to advance gun control, the period immediately before and after his election saw a stockpiling of ammunition and weapons in Arizona, and the state legislature has been active in overturning what few regulations existed, making sure all who wish can be armed. Underscoring Luntz' thesis that what matters is what people hear, in Arizona, says McDonald, "Every gun regulation is tantamount to confiscation."
People view issues through ideological lenses. When former GOP leader and conservative activist Dick Armey makes fun of MSNBC's Rachel Maddow, he doesn't have to say liberal, and when liberals mention Fox News, they don't have to say conservative. We get it, just as we get what it means when politicians say they are pro-choice or pro-life. These labels tell us about one aspect of a politician's inclination to vote, and they remain strong indicators 37 years after the Supreme Court ruled that abortion is legal. A conflict between pro-choice Democrats and pro-life Democrats almost took down the health-care bill. An executive order issued by Obama reaffirmed language in the bill that nothing in the measure would change existing law that prohibits federal funds to be spent on abortion. Words matter even when all they do is maintain a carefully negotiated impasse and a veneer of civility between what we intend to say and what other people hear.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

36 Comments

Filter by:
sfcat

Good, smart article. Well thought out. Let's see more like it.

August 13 2010 at 1:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Russ Klass

How about integrity and honesty?

August 13 2010 at 11:56 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
paulatkinson22

Putting Reagan and Obama together in an article is an insult to Regan. Obama isn't, can't be, and will never be what Reagan was as a leader for this country.

August 13 2010 at 11:37 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Walt

FOR ALL THE SHORT MEMORIES, OR NO MEMORIES: CARTER LEFT A 60 BILLION DOLLAR DEBT, REGAN LEFT A 5.22 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT, AND LITERALLY DOUBLED GOVERNMENT. OH YOU DID NOT KNOW THIS OR DID NOT HAVE A DEMOCRAT TO BLAME, OR IS IT HIDDEN FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU IN SOMETHING CALLED BOOKS.

August 13 2010 at 10:03 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
Steve

Are you people nuts? Reagan is the one who started America's decline into the messes we have now. He hated the middle class and working Americans. He started all this union busting because he thought only the rich should have power. He jacked up costs and taxes when his rich buddies saw average Americans making big money in the real estate business. And don't give me that baloney about him being "the great communicator". If you look at his old speeches, he never said anything substantial but, being an actor, he hoodwinked all of you.

August 13 2010 at 9:42 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Louis

I don't think I've ready read a more pointless article. Did it really take that many words to say Obama needs another slogan? And obviously I'm not the only American who wants more than a "slogan" president. I know this is hard to believe, but actions speak louder than words. Reagan actually followed through with his words and Obama never will.

August 13 2010 at 9:42 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
dreambilder57

Experience is the big thing . Honesty and truthfulness might help . To want to change something does not mean it will happen . But if you really try to make it better you can be respected for it . Reagan had reganomics the present administration has flunked economics 101. You can't tax people to death and expect them to work to help . You can't give everyone a break you have to have qualified people who know how to run their businesses and if they fail then another entrepeuer will pick up the slack as long as there are incentives to do that . We are in trouble because of a house and senate that has bowed to the will of the president. Bashing Bush is no answer He had a house and senate against him the last two years he was in office. We need to look at the whole government not just one person . Lets remember this in November... and 2012.

August 13 2010 at 9:42 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
aal1113

Another story that pushes the liberal agenda. I just wish that once I could read a story that sticks to the facts. If Ms. Clift would have done her homework and read the new Health-Care Bill, she would realize how many mistakes she made in this short story. Existing clinics can get federal funding ... such as "Planned-Parenthood" ... which can now get enough funds to expand their operation to include Abortion Clinics ... all FEDERALLY FUNDED.
The "Anti-Choice" example clearly shows that Ms. Clift is Pro-Abortion and therefore feels the need to publish articles that are 100% personal opinion.
When will the media return to the table and do the job of the 4th branch of government?

August 13 2010 at 9:39 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Kelly

Obama has no experience and never had it. At least Reagan was a governor. But having said that, if all it takes is a simple slogan to motivate you, you arent reaching high enough. Events, people, actions should be your motivation. Simple slogans are sound bites and can be taken out of context.

August 13 2010 at 9:20 AM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
lawbabe38

My initial response to this article is "Careful, your bias is showing" Interesting how she spends several sentences trying to justify her use of the phrase "anti choice" but a scant phrase on the ancillary phrase "anti life." She also apparently misses the point that the current president has been ALL about slogans. He is, however, short on ideas as to how to fix the problems which face this country and short on actual pride in this country. Given that, he will never be able to achieve Reagan's success in a second term election. Even when people doubted Reagan's abilities, his commitment to this country and its well-being were never in question. Given the proclivity of this administration to criticize our country publicly, and to vacation outside of our country at a time they are trying to encourage tourism here, Obama will never engender the kind of pro-America support base which helped Reagan to succeed.

August 13 2010 at 9:03 AM Report abuse +20 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>