Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Are Uppity Women Paving the Way for Gay Marriage, or Closing the Door?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
"If you don't like gay marriage, blame straight people. They're the ones who keep having gay babies." That's the new virtual bumper sticker slapped onto my mother Frances' Facebook page. Frances, a lesbian, is unmarried for three reasons 1) it ain't legal -- yet; 2) she hasn't found an acceptable "mate"; and 3) because who the heck wants to get married nowadays anyway? I'm considering coming up with a commitment-phobe catch phrase of my own -- "Marriage is as marriage does."

In nearly every state save Hawaii (one of the first to question the constitutionality of banning gay marriage in 1993) the rate of marriage has dropped over the last two decades. In good old South Carolina, for example, the marriage rate in 1997 was 15.9 per 1,000 people, and in 2007, it was 7.9. According to the Center for Disease Control, "The majority of men and women will marry at some point: The probability that men and women will marry by age 40 is over 80%." Oh, and half of those marriages will end in divorce. Awesome. There is hope for me yet! I'll more than likely get married, but that contract is pretty much doomed from the outset. With numbers like these, who needs constitutional amendments?

The religious Right, gay marriage opponents, people who hate Rosie O'Donnell, and whomever else would like to hop on the banning bandwagon seem to be fighting the wrong fight. Like Sisyphus, the mythical king forced for all eternity to push a huge boulder up a large hill only to see it roll down again, opponents of same-sex marriage are doing nothing to solve the very real problem of the declining importance of marriage. No one's come knocking on my door asking why I'm single (well, no one but my mom). In order to save the sanctity of marriage, why not just give it to the folks who are actually asking for it? Because the rest of us, the straight people, don't seem to be treating it right. And isn't the first thing you're supposed to do in an abusive relationship is get the heck out?

"Uppity women changed marriage a lot. If they hadn't, why would any gay or lesbian person want a share in it?" wrote Hirshman's take down of the idealized "between a man and a woman" coupling most same-sex marriage opponents allude to is eye popping, to say the very least. The history of the institution involves legalized rape, indentured servitude and sanctioned murder. Hardly the Ozzie and Harriet archetype. But it's Hirshman's assertion that "uppity women" helped save marriage by changing it that I find both true and paradoxical. Because it's these same "uppity women" -- whom I assume are well educated, financially solvent on good days and contributing actively to society -- who are eschewing marriage in the first place.

In "Eat Pray Love," Julia Roberts, playing real-life writer/world traveler/former wife Liz Gilbert, simply decides one day that her marriage is over. Her then-husband is portrayed in the film as something like a 1950s housewife -- cute, supportive and flighty -- and in the end, the traditional gender role reversal in their marriage just doesn't work for Liz, who has the means to go it alone. And so she does.

Up until last month, Gilbert's ex-husband "Stephen" (nee Michael Cooper) was releasing a rebuttal memoir called "Displaced," which he is currently re-shopping to publishers after parting ways with his book's former home, Hyperion. He said his former editors wanted something more "racy," and apparently the idea of borrowing some of the shine from his ex-wife's sparkling name left a bad taste in his mouth. Actress Portia De Rossi, on the other hand, is happy to have her name tied tightly to her better half's. De Rossi, who married comedienne Ellen DeGeneres in 2008, recently petitioned to change her own name to Portia Lee James DeGeneres. See? Some people still value tradition.
Filed Under: Gay Rights, Woman Up, Culture

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

7 Comments

Filter by:
bpdarling

The divorce rate among STRAIGHT people in this country EXCEEDS 50%!!! Further, if people want to go down the "sexual" road.....perhaps we should talk about the MILLIONS of children born to UNWED STRAIGHT PARENTS in this country. Not exactly the "marriage" that the opponents of gay marriage like to admit.

This whole issue has NO BASIS in morality OR religeon. NONE. PERIOD. Religeous people will say that God says same sex marriage is wrong. Well, my God never said that...MY God tells me to love my neighbor and do unto others....etc.

BOTTOM LINE....This is a constitutional issue, which the republican tea party frenge wing should LOVE, as they cling to the constitution. There is ZERO BASIS to exclude certain people from civil rights in equality in this country. Black people experienced this, and all other minorities as well.

Another fact....the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of the self appointed "moral police" that are so adimately against full equality are WHITE MEN over the age of 50. NEWS FLASH to those people....America is tired of your hate and discrimination, and in 2010, it is YOU who are in the minority. Have a nice day.

August 13 2010 at 6:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ajkartist

Anyone who says gay marriage, or gay unions or gay relationships are just about sex has never been in one. I met my partner in 1981, when I was in college. We were both attracted to eachother, but more important, we became strong friends as well. He inspired me to become politically active on campus - I ran for, and became the Chairman of the university program board. He loved the fact that I was into running every day - and so he came with me, and started exercising for his health. I was intrigued with Science, and he was in medicine. When I finished my degree, I enrolled in his school to study for two more years in geosciences. Together, we mutually inspired eachother. We traveled together, and I would help him prepare speaches that he had to give at his hospital later on because I was the better writer. We shared a life together. We did everything a hetero couple does together - with the exception of having kids.
My partner also inspired my nephews and nieces, and I was well loved by his nephews. We shared our lives together for 25 years. At the end, he was diagnosed with cancer, and I took off work, and was his primary caretaker for the last 15 months of his life. If you think the relationship was all about sex, all I can suggest is that you are projecting your own viewpoint of what a relationship is all about, and that's fine for you, but it certainly wasn't me and my partner. All of the people we hung around with were also in long term relationships, and they shared other things, like religion, politics, hobbies, interests, etc. Sex is a very small part of the bigger picture of love and the wonderful gift of becoming soul-mates. Please, don't confuse what I had with my partner with whatever it is you call a relationship, because what we had was a full life, rich with experiences and love.

August 13 2010 at 12:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
elnpet

Love is not sex. SEX is just sex and untill people understand this , the world will stay crazy. What in the xxxx does one womam get from being with another woman ? Just what they call love that is just sex. Are they sick or what ? Never lasts does it ?

August 13 2010 at 10:16 AM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
KLS

I wonder how much of our tax dollars is or has been used for this? As for gay marriage itself: Live and let live. As long as they adhere to the same civil and tax laws, who are we to tell a committed couple they cannot marry their s.o.? We give more benefits and rights to illegal immigrants who don't even speak our language, pay taxes, or even live here legally than we do gays who want to be married. As long as they are over 18, both concenting, respect and obey laws governing a traditional marriage, it is their business. Sounds like it is 'justice for all as long as you think like I do.' C'mon USA join the 21st century.

August 13 2010 at 9:31 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
KMA

It may be a way around the glass ceiling for occupations formerly barred for women. Perhaps they now need to form their own church run by women executives and modled like the Roman Catholic Church and see how peace with one's self the other side can be.

August 13 2010 at 6:29 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
france

This article was fun and smart...even Christian theologians know that judging someone get's us nowhere, so we might as well do the old fashioned thing--get to know each other as individuals and allow each of to choose the lifestyle we find most productive and that fits our lives and SELF....Can't we all just try harder to get along/ can't we all live our lives so that we let others live theirs? Irregardles, the majority of us have no control over that other person to begin with and we do control our choices to live according to the values we choose...GOD IS LOVE, not ......Talk about the differences.......Use energy on common ground....and be happy when people find love. Period. Its an absolute treasure in today's hardships....Let all "them" be happy. Go find your own too.

August 13 2010 at 2:59 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
allisonisa39e

Why do we maintain the institution of marriage. Just move in together. If you feel you must have some sort of legal document then we need a form that you send in to a governmental agency with both of your signatures-have it notarized if you wish.

August 13 2010 at 2:36 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>