AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
McDuffie is one of more than a dozen men who've come forward to claim they were the sailor in the photo. But he's the only one who had an explanation for the awkward angle of the kisser's left arm. "I moved my hand back so he could see her face."The woman standing behind the nurse in the photo is my aunt Mildred Beaudry. Mildred was a nurse, also, but not in uniform that day. Thought you would like to know.....
August 14 2010 at 11:46 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWe need to know about the other 11 people wh appear in the picture
August 14 2010 at 10:01 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Replygoodgod for us to have an instant celebration.
August 14 2010 at 9:10 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyFor those who think the US was inhumane for Hiroshima & Nagasaki, how inhumane were the Japanese for Bataan, Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Kwajalein, Eniwetok, Saipan, Guam, Peleliu, Iwo Jima, & Okinawa. Those that live by the Samurai Sword, die by the Atom Bomb. Alls fair in love & war.
Richard V. Horrell
I believe pictue was on cover of LIFE magazine. (no longer around) Gerry O'Shea
August 14 2010 at 7:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyI hope no one has the audacity to tell the US GIs massing to invade Kyushu that President Truman made the wrong A-bomb decision.
August 14 2010 at 6:48 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyWrong David. As gruesome as the A-bomb was, it saved hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives if the war was to continue. Fighting like "men" as you put it is just plain stupidity if there's another alternative to end the fighting quickly. Japan was invading other countries and was picking the fight with us. They made that very clear when they attacked us.
August 14 2010 at 8:14 PM Report abuse Permalink +11 rate up rate down ReplyDavid, it sounds as if you are rationalizing Japan's bombing of Pearl Harbor which you may have a valid point based upon the U.S. influence, but can you come up with some historical context that would give the Japanese a good reason to invade Indochina in 1939 and literally slaughter 20 million Chinese and Burmese people. There is a history lesson for you and they don't teach that in school either. What was that purpose? The U.S. may have provoked an attack, but only to prevent the world from being suppressed by an imperialistic power populated with a bunch of lunatic egocentric leaders. I don't like to say it, but Japan did get what was coming to them. I also believe that the world has learned a valuable lesson from Germany and Japan's example from WWII. That is don't be an aggressor and make other peoples of the world submit to your demands or you will face the same just harsh consequence of being bombed until you surrender. Needless to say there hasn't been a need to use a nuke since Hiroshima, so I think everyone has gotten the point.
August 14 2010 at 11:09 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyif you go to san diego, there is a statue of the picture near the midway muesem
August 14 2010 at 6:47 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI was under the impression that the sailor was so excited and happy about the results of the war that he had acted on impulse. Those were definitely the good ol' days. An incident like that these days would probably end up with a different outcome with the whole Navy would get sued!
August 14 2010 at 6:31 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyUnfortunately, our nation is now populated by so many bleeding heart sympathizers, I wonder if we have the will to again defeaat a mortal enemy. IF we do, we should be about the business of doing just that instead of goofing along for 9 years in a losing military action. Where is a Harry Truman when you need them? We need to elect one in the worst kind of way.
August 14 2010 at 6:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +13 rate up rate down ReplyHiroshima and Nagasaki were not monstrous events, except from the point of view of the people who were there. It was doing what we had to in order that the war end and peace once again be. That war might still be going on unless the Japanese ran out of people to fly planes and shoot. Of course, it would be better if the bombs had not had to be dropped. There was hope for a time that the energy source discovered for them would be used for peaceful purposes but people are, after all, people and cannot resist the use of a new weapon. God help us.
August 14 2010 at 6:24 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
62 Comments