Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

John McCain: I Haven't Changed My Positions, and Don't Ask Me About Trust

5 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
QUEEN CREEK, Arizona -- It's dark, but still an oppressive 102 degrees, when Sen. John McCain agrees to talk to me in a parking lot next to his campaign SUV (flex-fuel and energy efficient, I'm assured). It's revved and running, no doubt for the air-conditioned comfort of those inside, but perhaps also for a quick getaway if needed.

I have a feeling our time will be short, so I plunge quickly into questions about the upcoming Aug. 24 Republican Senate primary . "Why are you spending so much money?" I ask (nearly $20 million so far against former congressman J.D. Hayworth, who has been in the 30s or lower in polls for two months). "To win," McCain replies.

"Do you think it takes that much to win?" I ask.

"Well, I don't know. But I've always done whatever's necessary to win," he says.

Jan Brewer, John McCainThere's a slight pause while I consider what he said, and he probably wonders why he said it. Then I ask him about Sen. Lindsey Graham's remark to The New York Times, that Graham understands his friend's moves away from risky past positions because "John's got a primary. He's got to focus on getting re-elected."

McCain interrupts me. "Lindsey knows that I don't change in my positions," he says. "I have not changed in my positions. I know how popular it is for the Eastern press to paint me as having changed positions. That's not true. I know they're going to continue to say it. It's fundamentally false. Not only am I sure that they'll say it, you'll say it. You'll write it. And I've just grown to accept that."

I think to myself that I've already written it -- as long ago as 2006, as recently as last month. I think, it's the core of Hayworth's campaign (his tagline is "A Consistent Conservative"). McCain has rationales for all of his shifts -- on climate change, immigration, taxes, gays in the military -- but there's no question there have been shifts. I don't say any of that. Instead, I say the crowd of 700 at the barbecue was friendly and there seems to be "a different sense of you here" than in Washington.

McCain responds with a laugh that signals not mirth, but resignation. "How many . . . of your colleagues would love to see John McCain, the nominee of the Republican Party, in serious trouble?" he says. "They've told me that off the record."

Why would they do that? I ask in disbelief. He starts to offer examples of negative reporting about him and his 2008 campaign before cutting himself off. "Look, it's over, it's done with," he says.

Clearly it's not over and done, in his mind or in the minds of the "Eastern press" -- at least those of us who covered his 2000 presidential campaign, that seat-of-the-pants maverick bid that came close to toppling the Bush dynasty. For us, there is no escaping his evolution over the years. For him, there's no escaping articles with headlines like "The Saddest Senator: Why John McCain has Become So Painful to Watch" and "What Would a Maverick Do?"

It had been four years since I interviewed McCain. At the time he was laying the groundwork for what became his successful 2008 nomination race -- aligning himself with the Bush tax cuts he had opposed in his campaign and in the Senate, reinforcing his ties with the Bush family, reaching out to the religious right. A visit to Liberty University prompted Comedy Central's Jon Stewart to ask, in fun, "Are you going into crazy base world?"

"I'm afraid so," McCain answered, also in fun. He was still co-sponsor, with then Democratic Sen. Joe Lieberman, of a bill to cap carbon emissions. He was still working with President George W. Bush and Sen. Edward Kennedy to give law-abiding illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.

He had not yet won the 2008 nomination and, along with it, the responsibility to lead rather than challenge his party. He had not yet named vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, who would unleash forces the John McCain of 1999 might have found a bit unsettling. The John McCain of today holds weekly conference calls with Tea Party activists and marvels at the GOP gains that he expects from "a revolution, a peaceful one, the likes of which I have never seen since I've been in public office."

Living in the Moment

McCain these days seems most comfortable in the moment, among those with little or no institutional memory: his spokeswoman, Brooke Buchanan, who was just starting college in 1999 ("Don't you think situations in the world change in four years?" she asks, defending the position changes her boss has just said he didn't make); a young local reporter in Queen Creek (he asks about immigration and is treated to some banter and a picture with the candidate and his wife); some 160 employees at the Cold Stone Creamery headquarters in Phoenix, hearing him during his first visit to their workplace.

Though McCain's jokes at the creamery are at least a decade old, this audience is new. He gets hearty laughs when he mentions the guy at the Scottsdale Rotary who introduced him by saying, "Here's the latest dope from Washington," and the guy in the airport who says, "Anybody ever tell you that you look a lot like Sen. John McCain? Doesn't it make you just mad as heck?" Almost all the questioners make clear they are in tune with McCain's politics. One worries about tax increases she says the Democrats are planning. Another wants to know what McCain would do about "Obamacare." A young man notes that McCain's 74th birthday is approaching (on Aug. 29), and asks for words of wisdom. "Serve a cause greater than yourself and inspire others to do the same," McCain advises.

McCain brings up immigration himself, and he is at once alarmist and soothing. Arizonans should not have to live in fear of drug smugglers, human smugglers and violence, he says, and calls people who want to boycott the state over its tough new law "despicable." He further says that "we are a nation of immigrants, and we cherish our Hispanic heritage here in Arizona. Spanish was spoken in Arizona before English was. But we want everyone to come here legally."

In our carside interview in Queen Creek, I ask McCain what will satisfy him on immigration, what will convince him it's time to move on from border enforcement to dealing with the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the country. It will be, he says, when the federal government spends the $4 billion it will take to put in place his and Sen. Jon Kyl's 10-point border plan and when local officials, including Gov. Jan Brewer, say the whole border is sealed as tight as Yuma. "The Yuma sector is quite secure," he says.

Several people at the cookout, including the chaplain at a nearby prison, tell me they appreciate McCain's recent focus on border enforcement. Yet several others say they hope and trust that once he's re-elected, he'll resume work on a broader solution to bring those here illegally out of the shadows. "For me, in his heart, he still wants to find a proper path to citizenship," says Betty Peterson of Eloy, a self-described "huge supporter" of McCain. "It won't be overnight. It'll be a process. They'll have to get in line. But I believe that there should be a path, some way to obtain a card if you're not a criminal. I hope that's where we're headed."

That gets to the core question for Hayworth and his supporters -- what will McCain do if or when he is re-elected? Will he once again champion comprehensive immigration reform and that path to citizenship? Renew his push to limit carbon pollution by capping it and allowing companies to buy and sell permits? If military leaders say it's time to repeal their don't ask, don't tell policy toward gay soldiers, will he be supportive?

Matters of Trust

Hayworth, who lost his House seat in 2006 and became a radio talk show host, delights in pointing out McCain's onetime support for cap-and-trade (which Hayworth calls "an ill-advised solution to a non-existent problem, because global warming is a hoax"); his votes against the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003; his push for "amnesty" for illegals (McCain says he never supported amnesty). He also tweaks McCain, famous for wanting to limit campaign spending, for spending so heavily against Hayworth -- including millions he transferred from his presidential coffers. "When all is said and done, $20 million will be spent to attack me in a primary. And the source will be the candidate who told us that all these contributions had a corrupting influence," Hayworth told a tittering audience in Phoenix last week.

Later, Hayworth and I are discussing McCain's move to the right and whether conservatives can rely on him to stay conservative, when a voter named Greg -- who refuses to give his last name -- stops by to urge Hayworth on. "The intensity's on your side," Greg tells him. "How can you trust a man like that? You know those two women who vote with the Democrats all the time? He's going to be right there with them (an apparent reference to Maine moderates Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins). And if we happen to get the Senate back, it's going to be razor thin and . . . he's going to be a vote for the other side."

Fortunately, I have saved the trust question for last in my six-minute encounter with McCain. What would you say, I ask, to Republicans who wonder if they can trust you? "We gotta go," Buchanan says, as McCain says, "Oh come on, come on, come on," and Buchanan continues with "Jill, come on, come on," and McCain is getting into the car.

"You're not answering?" I ask through the protests. "I'll answer," he says, turning toward me. "I'll say I'm proud of my record, I'm proud of my leadership, I'm proud of leading the fight against the stimulus package and Obamacare and the leadership role I played in the Senate and with Republicans. And they're very happy with me. Call Mitch McConnell or Jon Kyl or anybody else."

I thank him for answering the question, which addresses a central argument Hayworth is making against him. But Buchanan still has things to say, the gist being that integrity and honor are the most important things to John McCain, and how can I even ask him about trust?

McCain is, as most people know, a bona fide war hero who endured more than five years of imprisonment in Vietnam. It's been his defining identity for many years, a pillar of his brand as a politician above politics. It is why his tagline this year is "Character matters," why his TV ads attack Hayworth as corrupt, a huckster, an "avid earmarker" and -- horrors -- a lobbyist.

That may seem like overkill (slightly more bombastic and rude than the question I put to McCain!) but it is working. Unless Hayworth has caches of voters hiding from pollsters, McCain looks like a safe bet to win the nomination. At that point he'll no longer be competing with a global-warming denier who would station the military at the border, end birthright citizenship and put every proposed federal regulation to a Senate and House vote. If McCain is re-elected this fall, perhaps the 2008 election will truly be over and done for him, and he can figure out, unencumbered by the past, what kind of legacy he wants to build.

Follow Jill Lawrence on Facebook and Twitter. She discussed her interview with John McCain on MSNBC's Daily Rundown.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.


Filter by:

I loved the series " maverick" They always ended well.McCain was great in his time but his wheels have fallen off since running for President.It is sad to think that he will be reelected and be part of the stagnation that his party has caused.We need to throw all of the incumbents(dems and reps) out and replace them with people who will fix what is broken. why no one has amended health care to eliminate the 2 year wait for Medicaire for the disabled is criminal. The partisan c### needs to end now. Right wing Christian fundamentalists and bleeding liberals are so bad for America. Oh, and immigration reform? Neither party can agree on anything. Stupid politicians!

August 25 2010 at 1:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

John McCain is John McCain, though I would like to see him retire. I hate to see a Senator just remain in the job, long after he/she has lost all effectiveness. I hated to see Senator Byrd die, in office. He should have retired years ago. They cannot lobby for the pork, when they are on life support.

August 20 2010 at 11:12 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

Once I learned that McCain cheated on and divorced his wife after she was severely injured in a car accident for a rich blond, there is no way I would ever put any trust in him. If you don't have the will to honor your marriage and stand by your wife when she needed you the most, you are low. Maybe good for business, but bad for my view of who should be in government. That is a huge character flaw in my book. To me whenever I see flaws like that, it's usually just the tip of the iceberg.

August 20 2010 at 10:10 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

McCain is another narcissist who's false self is so identified with being a Senator that he won't retire....because he would be nothing without the office. It's sad. It's the old admonishment "what does a man gain if he gains the whole world and yet loses his soul?" McCain is plastic and fake and soulless. Yet, JD Hayworth is dunce and is lucky if his IQ tops 90. Republicanism is politicized narcissism. Their modus operandi and behavior and positions reveal this fact...that republicans dwell at a lowest level of human consciousness.

August 20 2010 at 9:12 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

John McCain, DEMOCRAT. NOT a Republican by any means, a/k/a RINO.

August 18 2010 at 10:50 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Ruth Ann

A limit on campaign spending to keep the playing field fair. That kind of money would go a long way in research of disease cures, helping and feeding the poor in the U.S.

August 18 2010 at 7:41 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

I will never vote anothe republican into office or a nother democrat in office untill there are more than two parties running ,and getting the same coverage from the media, all media. it should be equal and fair and no party or candidate allowed to spend more than any other. Also I will never vote for anyone that has been in office longer than any president.Change and improvement does not come frome stagnent old men and women.

August 18 2010 at 2:28 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to JP's comment

JP, please; that is no way to behave. That is abdicating, quitting on your country. The media will not change for you or me. Take the path forward, know whom to vote for - and know whom to vote against - in the best interest of personal liberties, personal responsibility, and of government of the people by the people, for the people. Vote for the best man or woman, not for the party. Vote for the principles that made this country great once, and can make our country great again.

August 18 2010 at 10:22 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

I hardly think that voting against two parties who you are fed up with is quitting on your country. Call it a vote of no confidence. Its hard for me to vote for the person when that person is still aligning themselves with one of the two parties people like JP or myself view as being 50% of the problem in Washington. (The other 50% being the other party.) We like to decry our political candiates of flip-flopping, but from what I've been able to observe, its the American people that keep flip-flopping back and forth between two parties that don't seem to be making America better for its citizens. Right now people blame the Democrats, but they got control of the congress because prior to that people were blaming the Republicans. Its hard for me to see myself voting for the principles that made this country great when that vote is for a Republican or Democrat. Sure there are a handful of people in both parties that are actually sharp and excellent representatives, but one must question why they remain committed to a political party that doesn't seem to be in line with their own views. Personally, I'd like to see political parties made illegal in the country. Of course that trounces on the very liberties I want to uphold, so I won't actively advocate for it. On the other hand, breaking the hold of a two-party system on this country might just be what restores it to greatness. I think that we the people have the power to force a change, and either move away from a two-party system, or at the very least, force bi-partisanship in our governements. Don't under estimate the power of the American people. If we really want the media or the government to change, we can force it to happen with rather peaceful means. The media, at least, is subject to consumer demands. If we're willing to make a few tough sacrfices in our individual lives, we can make a difference that improves the lives of every single American.

August 20 2010 at 12:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Will the real McCain please stand-up ?. It's sad to see a once great maverick go to pots.

August 18 2010 at 1:28 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

One of the things about John McCain that most people have figured out already is that He is a ""Flip Flopper"". John McCain all of his life changes his views on issues when they are in his best interest...While in the Military same things would happen, Whatever it took to further his career he would do....In the senate he introduces bills that are bebficial to his re-election effort.. Most of these Bills are for show only...Ask the Indians in Arizona what he did to them to garner support for his campaign funds thru special interest groups.. ""Old John"" like the above article portends will do anything say anything to get votes...His voice in the Senate has done more harm to this country then any other sitting Senator, except maybe Jon Kyle another Senator from the State of Arizona. A person could go on for Hours writing about ""OLD"" John and his special interest people....One must ask the question, why would a person spend $20 million dollars on getting re- elected to a position that only pays $130,000 plus fringe benefits....""Old"" John was supposedly the Champion of Campaign Finance Reform making statements that money should not be the controlling factor for elections...Here again he now changes his stance on Reform...Like he says He will do anything to Win...During the Presidential Election all of his mantra's were the need for reform...He just can't be trusted...The American people seen thru this facade and Did not vote for him....The Hispanic people in Arizona should not trust or vote for Him because of his ""Flip Flooping"" on issues

August 18 2010 at 12:34 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

As a lifelong Republican who used to admire Sen. McCain, I must say it's time for him to leave. He HAS flip-flopped, and now doesn't appreciate being called on it. As the one of the front-men for "comprehensive immigration reform" (read: amnesty) he has now backed away.

August 18 2010 at 11:39 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>