Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Robert Gates Plans a Last Hurrah to Control Defense Spending Before Retiring

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
David Wood
Chief Military Correspondent
With his casual announcement that he will retire sometime next year, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has signaled that a "surge'' in his own assault on Pentagon old-think, bureaucracy and inflated budget gimmickry has begun.

In the 45 months since he was sworn in as President George W. Bush's second defense secretary, Gates has smiled often and fought briskly to force the Pentagon and its outriders in Congress and the defense industry to live up to the high expectations of the troops in the field and taxpayers at home.

That meant, he often said: No business as usual. No meandering strategic thinking. No excuses for poor performance. Having watched in horror as soldiers and Marines in unarmored Humvees fell victim to roadside bombs in Iraq, Gates decreed that the Defense Department would spend what it took to support troops at war; and everything else would be secondary. Going to war with the army you have -- as his predecessor Donald Rumsfeld famously once told a soldier who was complaining about lack of armor for vehicles in Iraq -- was not anywhere near good enough in Gates' view.

Robert GatesThose were iron teeth behind the smile. The two top Air Force officials, Chief of Staff Gen. Michael Moseley and Secretary Michael W. Wynne, fought Gates on limiting purchases of the supersonic stealth fighter, the F-22 (useful in a hypothetical future war with China). Worse, they allowed nuclear weapons-handling standards to deteriorate. He fired them both. Army Gen. David McKiernan, as top commander in Afghanistan, wasn't moving surely enough against insurgents. He, too, was axed. When a scandal erupted at Walter Reed Army Medical Center about maltreatment of wounded troops, a cascade of senior officials bit the dust. This spring, amid signs of trouble in the multibillion-dollar F-35 fighter program, Gates sacked its manager, Marine Maj. Gen. David Heinz.

That kind of management style has caught the attention of a new generation of battle-tested officers in the field, who now feel encouraged to speak in terms that until recently would have been considered apostasy and grounds for reassignment to Iceland. That was evident in the conversation I had a year ago with an Air Force brigadier general in Afghanistan, who railed against the "fat cats'' in the defense industry and the Pentagon as standing in the way of military innovation.

Gates, in an interview with Foreign Policy magazine released Aug. 16, declined to spell out precisely where he will focus his renewed efforts on defense sloth and waste. But in his interview with journalist Fred Kaplan, he left no doubt about how he will use his remaining time.

"I'm going to strike early,'' Gates told Kaplan. "I'm going to announce a bunch of things. You know, I've been around bureaucracy long enough to know what the strategy is in terms of waiting me out. To tell you the truth, that strategy would be in place if I were here four or eight more years. So I intend to start fast and with some fairly significant decisions to make it clear I won't be out-waited, that this is going to happen.''

Gates exudes confidence that he can battle and bluff his way past recalcitrant generals and admirals and even defense spending stalwarts on Capitol Hill. "These are smart people,'' he said. And even Congress is starting to understand the need to rationalize defense spending.

Packing the galleries on the military side, Gates already has had a hand in selecting the Pentagon's top leaders including Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the new Marine commandant, Gen. James Amos, and Army Secretary John McHugh. Gates also will have time to propose a successor to the Army's soon-to-retire chief of staff, Gen. George Casey.

But across Washington, Gates said, there is an appreciation that the era of unlimited defense spending is over. In the Foreign Policy interview, Gates continued:
They understand the pressures that are going to come to bear on the department because of the national economic situation and the deficits. But I think they also -- they now see themselves that they can't afford $2 billion airplanes, $3 billion destroyers, and so on. That they have to make some hard choices, and they can't have this whole panoply of programs that are over budget and overdue. And, you know, as money becomes tighter, money spent on over-budget items is a real cost. I mean, it's not something they're going to make up in the next budget, next year's budget. And so I think that it's a significant measure of both fiscal and strategic reality.

Gates' announcement is sure to set off months of speculation about his successor. A presumed front-runner is Richard Danzig, a former Navy secretary who was a top national security and foreign policy adviser to presidential candidate Barack Obama in 2008.

A dark horse candidate: Michele Flournoy, who as Gates' chief policy adviser is perhaps the second most influential civilian at the Pentagon. A brilliant academic (Harvard, Oxford, National Defense University) and Pentagon strategist, she was the intellectual and organizational driving force behind the Afghan strategy adopted by President Obama last December, and sweeping reform-minded reviews of the U.S. defense posture and its strategic nuclear weapons strategy.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

34 Comments

Filter by:
punnster

Yeah, Democrats demonstrated their skill at making cuts in our intel services making us vulnerable for 9-11.

August 17 2010 at 10:02 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
gt2eagle

Hopefully Gates will do what should have been done long ago, mainly to scuttle programs for pilaging the budget by inflating contracts in a never ending spending for sake of profiteering. This has wasted more tax dollars than any other area.

August 17 2010 at 10:11 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
billbama

So tell me Mr Gates if you are so smart why didn't you halt production of the Stryker Vehicle when everyone who has every assembled one or seen one hit with an RPG knows it is a death trap and is a defective vehichle from design flaws from the beginning! So what does the government do, give the same contractors billions more to build another vehicle. Waste? Please!!!!

August 17 2010 at 9:29 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
billbama

If Gates truly wants to start with waste he should start with himeself! Gates knows where the waste really is but he is like all other politicians that are either involved in the waste, or their friends and families are.

Hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted, stolen embezelled, given away with worthless contracts that are way over inflated so that someone or someones can recieve kickbacks from the government each year by government employees and he knows this. Many government contracts are not even needed and when awarded they never deliver what was promised Numerous contracts are duplicated and often they go back and ask for additional money before the contract is over. I know I have seen it with my own two eyes too many times!

Gates like all other politicians thinks everyone in the USA is stupid!

August 17 2010 at 9:24 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
frankc1932

If Gates is goning to crack down on spending why hasn't it been done decades ago. Everyone knows washington has been doing it for decades. Where does he think we live.. We are not stupid but I think maybe he is if he thinks he can put a handle on washington .

August 17 2010 at 9:11 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
blumul1

Wonder if he'll have to pay higher health care rates like he wants others to do? Don't give retirees a raise, but in next breath want to raise cost of Tri Care, whats wrong with this picture? Make all the Senators and Congress pay for their own health insurance, instead of nursing off the rest of us, make them go WAIT in a room to be attended too, fill out paperwork in triplicate and be told "oh thats not covered by your carrier" you have to pay a co-pay FIRST.
Good Luck with that!

August 17 2010 at 9:09 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to blumul1's comment
Steven Donovan

Do you receive Tri Care? You do realize that Tri Care premiums are miniscule compared to what others pay? My family of 4 pay $500 a year in Tri Care premiums and other non military families pay that per month. I have no problem with an increase in premiums for Tri care.

August 17 2010 at 11:48 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
We're Millionair

It is amazing.

1. We blame Bush for Iraq and daily count casualties. Obama dammed the surge and General Petrayya (excuse spelling, content is important and sequal of events.) He said the key figure is Bin Laden and he would get him and we should be in Afkanastan. WE are.

2. This is Obama's war and you note, no information of consequence on the war or those who have been caught as terriorists, Fort Hood etc. etc. You note he apologizes for our beloved country which can always use improvments, not destruction!

3. President Obama "quietly" forced McCrystal's resignation. Now, McCrystal should not have shared his views. He should have kept quiet, kept his job and been a good General. In fact, there has been talk that some of what was said he did not even say it but, the handwriting was on the walls, he resigned.

What he said was correct. Obama has no background to be telling General's what to do as he tells Congress what to do. Now you have a Cournell who refuses to escort our president and take orders from him as Obama sets out on another excursion! So, he knowingly will be court martialed most likely.

Obama knows more than all the Military. This is his war and he doesn't know that he has created another Viet Nam and if we leave just as before, it is likely that the Talaban will come in and massaccre all the people. Remember Viet Nam, Congress wanted to leave and they did. Millions were murdered.

Now, Obama has hired General Petrais from the Surge he dammed to help him!!!!!!

He has claimed that military pay will decrease but he has millions or more left in the stimulus money. He spends money like a run-a-way freight train, on himself and on his party and on the terriorists and Foreign Combantants. We pay for the Iman to travel to Saudi Arabia. Doesn't something sound wierd?????

Just look at the patterns and vote in November. And, when you vote you will notice new names as third party! They are written in so there are less votes for R. This is not about party. Business will never be as usual if anyone wants to stay in government. This is our country being taken away.

Please, whatever you vote, vote for R. or D.

Thank you.,

August 17 2010 at 9:07 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
abbyndavid

Slash defense spending (which already is flat) so that social spending can be further wildly expanded?!? This will result in another liberally created "hollow force", like the ones in the past, that will have to be corrected at great cost in the future (if we have time).

August 17 2010 at 9:05 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
pbsleepyhollow

The consideration to reduce military spending at this time will be one of our worst mistakes in history. We better ramp up our foreign language skills, as we will need them to communicate with who ever takes over our country!!

August 17 2010 at 9:03 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to pbsleepyhollow's comment
jancf

He is reducing military spending by cutting waste and spending on unnecessary/outdated equipment. This will make us MORE effective. Times have changed, and with it, our needs to maintain national security. The alternative is to just keep going along throwing away a fortune on useless spending. He isn't downgrading our military effectiveness, but rather increasing it.

August 18 2010 at 10:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
barbara123abc

Gates was a Bush appointee; had you read the article, you would know that. Now, if only we could get a Gates in every single department in the government, perhaps we could survive as a country.

August 17 2010 at 8:58 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>