Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Dr. Laura Schlessinger -- First Amendment Champion?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Though Dr. Laura Schlessinger says she intends to end her radio talk show when her contract expires in December, she isn't going quietly. On "Larry King Live," she gave her reasons. "I want to regain my First Amendment rights," she said.
"I want to be able to say what's on my mind and in my heart and what I think is helpful and useful without somebody getting angry, some special interest group deciding this is the time to silence a voice of dissent and attack affiliates, attack sponsors. I'm sort of done with that."
This comes after she labeled as perhaps "hypersensitive" an African-American woman upset at disrespect from her white husband's friends and family. The caller also got a lecture about President Obama, racism and the acceptability of the N-word. Schlessinger apologized for saying the N-word "all the way out -- more than one time," but considering her defiant tone when answering King, another broadcast personality moving on to other challenges, maybe that apology was not entirely sincere.
The First Amendment Schlessinger invokes means she talks, and everyone else shuts up. My take on her N-word soliloquy primarily criticized her lack of response to the caller, who saw her problem take a back seat to the good doctor's political and social world view.

So now, Dr. Laura will move on to blogs, YouTube and other projects, with many followers who agree with everything she said, judging from some of my e-mails. They insist that Schlessinger should be held up (or down) to the same standards as R-rated rappers and comics. A few made lame comments, such as the guy who asked if I ate watermelon with my white in-laws. (Does anyone think jokes about black people eating watermelon are funny?) And quite a few lamented the end of "free speech," as defined by Schlessinger on King's show.
I agree that she has the right to say anything she wants to, and she exercised that right. She wasn't arrested. Government agents didn't come knocking at the radio station door. She berated a caller to her show -- not for the first time -- and nothing happened, at first.
But every other American has those same rights -- to speak up, to criticize, and to comment. Listeners can disapprove – loudly. Sponsors can decide if they want their products to be associated with what Dr. Laura is selling. (General Motors and Motel 6 had already pulled their show sponsorship, the AP reported.) Anyone who has ever worked a job knows that a certain behavior, or fashion sense, will bring reprimands and termination. That's how it works. As a conservative supporter of the free market, Schlessinger certainly knows that.
I don't understand exactly what Schlessinger means as she defends her actions -- that she can talk, and you have to take it? That there won't be consequences? Sounds like the behavior of a garden-variety bully, not a defender of the Constitution. A lot of people judged Dr. Laura's comments as incendiary as yelling "fire" in a crowded theater. The First Amendment was there – despite what she now says – to protect her words, and theirs.
So many of my e-mails recall a halcyon time when people could string every ethnic and religious slur end to end (then they proceed to do just that) without rebuke. Apparently, being courteous to fellow Americans is driving a lot of folks crazy. Are they just too lazy to broaden their vocabularies? Read a dictionary, I say. There are words to fit every occasion. But if that's too much trouble, by all means, go up to the biggest, meanest people you barely know, and insult them. Say what's on your mind. Just don't be surprised if they exercise their First Amendment right to be offended.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

14 Comments

Filter by:
CAE5877

The "N" word is old and outdated and no longer listed in the Webster's Dictionary of English words, so why use the "N" word at all. Use only words found in the English Dictionary. I learned the "N" word had to do with Nigerian and people who lived along the Niger River. So what is so wrong about being Nigerian??????? Should I also ask what is so wrong about living along the Nile River??????? As a child growing up in purochial/religious school, Moses was one of my favorite Biblical heroes. Moses was given up by his mother, put into a basket to float down the Nile River who was eventually found, adopted and carried out God's commands. If there is a dirty word not acceptable by Black African Americans, it should be the word "Black Slavery". Black Slavery was a word used in high school text books. Do Black African Americans object to the word Black Slavery mentioned in history books???????

August 26 2010 at 12:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
picframing

The black argument that the n-word is ok for them to use and other people can't is so utterly stupid it's beyond logical common sense. All hatred past or present has the right to be expressed. But Constantly being reminded that they were systematically repressed 60 years ago and beyond is getting old. You don't see the Jews bashing Mercedes, Standard Oil, IBM or the United States for supporting Germany prior to our entrance in WWII. You all remember that we hated the Brits for their oppression.

August 23 2010 at 1:13 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
vallesula

I can easily accept racist bigotry from a child that was left behind, but a PHD holder outto know better; and if she passed through the schoolinstead of having the school passed over here, by now she should know...., " dah-world IS black .

August 20 2010 at 9:27 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

A call from someone in a mixed marriage is offended when the N word is used among people who come into the house. Yes it is an offensive word. So is the S... word or the C... word or the B.... word. I thought we were grown ups.

August 20 2010 at 7:05 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
sfbay0001

This is typical of the "Dr Laura" act. First she does something truly wrong, distasteful, hurtful, and rude, and THEN she wants to be seen as the victim of the outrage her actions caused in the first place. She thrives on the controversy she generates. It's almost as if she's addicted to it. In my opinion, the best way to deal with her is to just ignore her. If more people just turned their backs on her, did not reply to her, and did not dignify her outlandish, hateful, conduct by responding to it, she'd go away, as would whatever remains of her corporate sponsors.

August 20 2010 at 4:49 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Hello Janice

I thought the first Amendment applied to everyone not just people who want to say hurtful things. The people who post their objections to Dr. Laura's choice of words have just as much right to voice, print or twitter their comments. Like you said, Mary, to Dr. Laura, Sara Palin and the like First Amendment rights mean I say or print what I want and you shut up and take it. Sorry but the Constitution does not work that way. Maybe a good old 7th grade Civics lesson is in order.

August 20 2010 at 1:31 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
John Vilvens

When one black calls another the n word that is fine. When a black calls a white a cracker or any other name it is fine. This is not free speech this is racism. If a white calls a black the n word it is racism. Which of these statements are true

August 19 2010 at 3:55 PM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
Steviey

People like "Darryl" and Schlessinger will never get it. They will only complain about their right to be racists or Homophobes being taken away from them. It's not taken away from you, but there are now consequences for being an ignorant racist in a more civilized society. We will never go back to the pre-Civil Rights era and most of us do not want to. Many conservatives wax poetically of how good it was during the era of Jim Crow, most not capable of fully understanding just what they are longing for. Being uninformed, undereducated or just plain ignorant as to the history of our United States and the World. The good thing for progressives, and most people, is that conservatives can never really turn back time. They can slow down progress, and even bring it to a halt for a time. But in the end, progressives always win. Ideals and moving forward are human nature, and scared conservatives can only inhibit it for so long. That's why there are no new ideas that usually emanate from hard core conservatives. They do not have ideas, but only want to go back in time when the white male ruled all. Where women were in the kitchen, Black folk knew their place, and there were not so many brown people everywhere. Even though it will never happen, clinging to the chance is the hard core conservatives only hope.

August 19 2010 at 2:37 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Drew

I don't think Dr. Laura understands how the First Amendment works: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Her actions have NOTHING TO DO with the First Amendment. As Mary mentions in the article, Schlessinger wasn't arrested, and the law never even enters into the equation here. She has every right to say whatever she wants, and I would never want to take that right away from her; but doesn't mean she can't be ridiculed, hated, or fired for it.

August 19 2010 at 11:55 AM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
Darryl

Dr Laura did absolutly nothing wrong. She voices her oppinions and has every right too. If a black dosent like what a white person says, it always becomes racist. The gays all think they deserve special rights and the normal, ethical and moral people get bashed. I am so sick of the one sided racist and gay crap that plagues are world today. Dr Laura is right on tract, she has great morals, her head is on right and is an inspiration. Oh i'm white and straight, so I guess you better bash me too.

August 19 2010 at 10:37 AM Report abuse -7 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Darryl's comment
jstetser

No, Darryl, you did a good enough job bashing yourself already. Thanks to the First Amendment, we all have that right and privilege. We still, however, have to deal with the real world repercussions of what we say and how we say it.

August 19 2010 at 3:22 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>