Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Gulf Oil Spill: Residents' Skepticism, Resentment Remain Uncapped

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The BP spill appears to be capped for good, even though the ultimate solution known as "final kill" has yet to be implemented. But while fresh oil has stopped gushing into the Gulf of Mexico, distrust and resentment continue to flow freely. Many citizens and scientists alike do not believe an inter-agency federal report stating that roughly 25 percent of the spilled oil was collected by processes such as skimming, 25 percent has deteriorated or been consumed by microbes, and 25 percent has dispersed. The remaining "residual amount," the report continues, ". . . is either on or just below the surface as light sheen and weathered tar balls, has washed ashore or been collected from the shore, or is buried in sand and sediments. . . . Oil in the residual and dispersed categories is in the process of being degraded."

One expert who disagrees with these findings, especially the notion that dispersed oil is harmless, is Samantha Joye, professor of marine sciences at the University of Georgia. "While some of the oil has most certainly evaporated," Joye said, "much of it was dispersed and this oil is still floating around, invisible to our eyes, within the ocean's water column." Joye went on to explain that some of the oil has probably "sedimented to the sea floor," where it is also invisible. "The fact that this oil is 'invisible,' " Joye concluded, "makes it no less of a danger to the Gulf's fragile ecosystems. Quite the contrary, the danger is real and the danger is much more difficult to quantify, track and assess." This is to say nothing of the danger that may also be posed by the controversial use of the dispersant Corexit.

Based on such statements as well as their own observations, many authorities along the Gulf Coast feel that the crisis is not over, and insist on remaining vigilant about protecting their shores. Oil is still floating on the water surface and also coming ashore, they report, so oil-blocking procedures must continue. These procedures range from the deployment of booms -- which do contain oil but are subject to wave and wind damage, and must often be replaced -- to the mega-million-dollar construction of sand berms. The latter project is dismissed by most scientific experts as untenable and appears to not be working. In between such extremes, however, is a method with proven efficacy, which can be easily reversed if necessary: the positioning of strings of barges across inlets. This creates a firm barrier against which the oil washes up and can then be easily collected.

Kevin Davis, the president of Louisiana's St. Tammany Parish (parishes are the equivalent of counties in other states), has installed three such barriers to keep oil from entering Lake Pontchartrain. This large estuary -- which forms the northern border of New Orleans and skirts the southern coast of Saint Tammany -- has remained almost completely oil-free. Commercial shrimping has proceeded there largely undisturbed. But the placement of these proven oil-blockers has caused an increasingly heated dispute between Davis and the federal government, especially the Coast Guard's Rear Adm. Paul Zukunft.

The issue is the removal of such temporary barriers in case of a tropical storm or, worse, a hurricane. In high winds, loose barges can function like huge steel sails, causing untold damage once in motion. During Hurricane Katrina, a loose barge contributed to the breach of New Orleans' Industrial Canal, which sent a fatal torrent into the city's Lower Ninth Ward and beyond. Photos of the beached barge became one of Katrina's defining images. Accordingly, the Coast Guard demands that barges, barge-mounted construction cranes and the like be secured in safe harbors during dangerous weather. Davis firmly supports this sound protective measure, but he disagrees with the Coast Guard as to where the barges should be moved.

For Tropical Storm Bonnie last month, the suggested location was Convent, Louisiana, some 70 miles up the Mississippi River. This would have entailed sending the flotilla from Lake Pontchartrain into the Mississippi via a lock on the Industrial Canal, which connects the two bodies of water. Since the barges cannot pass through the lock all at once, the process is lengthy and can cause a bottleneck of other boat traffic. In addition, a string of barges traveling up the Mississippi via towboat or tugboat averages a speed of five miles per hour on its serpentine route along the river's many bends. Therefore Davis sought, instead, to use a harbor in nearby Lake Shore Estates, which, he stated, is proven to be secure. After considerable debate, Davis prevailed -- in that case. "That way," he explained, "I can get the barges back in place fairly quickly, and we will not be left unprotected for the days it would take to bring them back here from upriver."

"I don't know why the government wants to do something more complicated and expensive," Davis continued, "other than their attitude of 'we're the boss and we'll show you.' " The situation came to a head again last week with the approach of Tropical Depression No 5. The Coast Guard ordered the barges moved upriver again, at the request of Boh Brothers Construction. This company is contracted to link the barges together and make sure the wall stays solid. (Boh Brothers, to whom the Unified Command Center referred questions for this article, did not return a call for comment as to why they consider the upriver site preferable to the much closer Lake Shore Estates.) Davis balked at the idea, forbidding it on the strength of an executive order issued he issued on July 22. In so doing he also cited his perceived authority, under Louisiana law, to retain ultimate control in a decreed state of emergency. Such an emergency edict has been in force in Saint Tammany Parish since April 29.

In response, Zukunft sent Davis a letter that challenged his command: "I reviewed your Executive Order . . . prohibiting the removal of assets, of any kind, that are being used in the efforts to protect St. Tammany Parish from the inundation of oil. . . . I am concerned that the tone of this order is inconsistent with your agreement to work with the Coast Guard. . . . I respectfully ask that you either rescind this Order or take all action necessary to ensure that there is no interference with the ongoing Federal response." In a move that belied his courteous tone -- and seemed to threaten Davis with arrest -- Zukunft sent a copy of the letter to Jim Letten, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The zealous Letten has a high national profile of late due to cases that include the indictments of 11 New Orleans police officers for various crimes related to the Danziger Bridge shootings, days after Hurricane Katrina.

Davis refused to comply, replying to Zukunft that "As we now enter the height of storm season, there are over 52 millions gallons of oil unaccounted for by the federal government's own estimates. . . . It would be irresponsible for me to rescind my order at this time."

On Friday, Aug. 13, Davis met with several other parish presidents, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, and retired Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen, the oil spill incident commander. Davis' regional colleagues were equally concerned about similar problems of command, jurisdiction, and a sense that local expertise has consistently been ignored. "Admiral Allen told me that no assets will be moved out of my parish for at least seven days," Davis recounted. "We said, 'Let's forgive each other and get back to work.' "

Meanwhile, Tropical Depression No. 5 looped around again and seemed poised for a second hit on Louisiana. "Then this past Monday, the 16th, I get a call from my emergency manager telling me that BP and the Coast Guard had started moving two sets of barges upriver again, to a site near the New Orleans airport. Not using the good harbor that we have right here," said Davis. A third set of barges, which spans The Rigolets (a channel between the Gulf and Lake Pontchartrain), remains in place at this writing.

"There has been a consistent pattern of this sort of thing in the federal response," Davis continued. "I try to be cooperative, I try to sit down and work with them. It seems like we're moving forward together, but then they'll just do what they want to do, despite what we've discussed. BP and the government keep telling us that they're separate, but they seem to always back each other up. It's confusing."

Amid such confusion, Davis' determination appears quite clear. "If they arrest me, that's OK," he said. "My job is to protect our residents and I'll continue to do that. I've never believed that all the oil has been found and that no more will come ashore and that there's no threat. My executive order stands and I want the assets to stay in my parish. I'm not going to put anyone or anything at risk, and I can move it all into safe harbor right here.

"But," Davis concluded, "they just don't want to listen."
Filed Under: Environment, Oil Spill

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

8 Comments

Filter by:
mvbluebandit

I am a comerical diving colector for shells and ecodurms (sand dollars/sea biscutts) during the summer season May threw september. I had some very big orders to fill this year 2010. By the way I live in the fla. keys. the moneys i make help pay for my lobster and stone crab traping . like boat repairs, trap repars,fishing permits,labor etc. with all tv news all over the world it put me out of business this season. all my customers cancled my diving orders. so it was like a domono efect. The news showed tar balls washing up on the keys beaches and made mass meadia event like it came from the deep water horizon. My business depends on the toust trade down here. so my customers got scared and cancled ther orders, so as of now it looks this season will be a mager bust for me, my family, and my helpers. my whife just opend a cleaning business last year. she said her cleanings are down 50% plus. we filed with BP so we are praying we will get help. MVBLUEBANDIT(THE CHUM CHUCKER) & FAMILY KEY LARGO ,Fl.

September 20 2010 at 11:44 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
knute9

"Roughly 25 percent of the spilled oil was collected by processes such as skimming, 25 percent has deteriorated or been consumed by microbes, and 25 percent has dispersed.".....WHICH MEANS 25% OF THE OIL, ABOUT 5 TIMES LARGER THAN THE EXXON VALDEZ, IS REMAINING IN THE GULF. THIS DISASTER IS BEING SWEPT UNDER THE RUG, OR MORE LIKE UNDER THE SURFACE (WITH TOXIC CHEMICALS). NOT ONLY HAS BP BOUGHT A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF ADVERTISING, BUT IT'S NOW APPEARS BP HAS BOUGHT THE NEWS MEDIA AS WELL.

August 20 2010 at 10:01 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
david3830

Davis is a resident and knows better than the goverment what will or will not work.Let the man do what he thinks is best.As from the start of this it always seems to me that thad allen and now zukfunt are in the pockets of big oil,is corruption in the air as we all know how bp can move mpney around.Maybe we shpould look into the coast guard a little mopre, as there opinions help bp and not AMERICANS.

August 20 2010 at 6:14 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mrscaptndavid

It is almost as if our federal government wanted to make the damage worse so they can justify their moritorium for offshore drilling. Their group of environmentalists they put in charge of making decisions on the offshore drilling is stacked to be prejudiced against any kind of drilling. They are putting those in the oil industry related businesses out of work in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. The Oil industry is an even bigger employer than the those in the marine fisheries. At a time of high unemployment, it seems all this president and his cohorts are interested in is pushing their environmental and social agenda forward instead of making putting Americans back to work! I do not understand this adminsitration's priorities. They have an attitude as if they are English aristocrats from the eighteenth and nineteenth centry. The democrats are no longer a party that represent the very people that voted them in but instead a party of "my way or the highway!"

August 20 2010 at 10:15 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
fingernail1941

Remains "Uncapped"....The irony!

August 20 2010 at 9:55 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
docktay

Bp has fired the majority of the coastal workers and those boats that were keeping the Gulf waters clean. Since different scientist has stated that up to 80% of the oil is still in the bottom of the Gulf and Bp is doing nothing to remove it, why would anyone believe anything Bp has to say?

August 20 2010 at 9:14 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
fishlover

let get the job done right the place, while bp still pay for it's and the expend.

August 20 2010 at 9:00 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners