Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Is Gulf Seafood Safe to Eat? Feds Say Yes, but Testing is Limited

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Government scientists told a congressional panel Thursday that seafood from the Gulf of Mexico is now safe to eat, even though no tests have been conducted on fish in the most toxic waters and new tests have not been developed to measure all of the effects of dispersants on fish.

The scientists also said that despite recent claims that most of the oil from the BP spill has disappeared, between 75 percent and 90 percent of the oil remains in the Gulf in some form.

The comments came at a special hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Bill Leher, senior response and restoration scientist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said Gulf seafood in stores and restaurants is safe to eat, but added that no tests have been conducted on fish in the most contaminated Gulf waters, which remained closed to fishing.

"Every seafood sample from re-opened waters has passed sensory and chemical testing for contamination of oil and dispersant," Leher told Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.). "No unsafe levels of contamination of the seafood has been found."

Donald Kraemer, acting director of the Center for Food Safety at the Food and Drug Administration, agreed. He called the components of the dispersant Corexit, a solvent used to break up oil, "unlikely to present a food safety concern." Kraemer said that while some components of Corexit are considered toxic, fish have not shown a propensity to accumulate the substances in their muscles.

The first note of caution in the hearing came from Paul Anastas, the EPA's witness, who warned that while limited tests have not shown dangerous levels of toxins in fish from dispersants, "the potential longterm effects on aquatic life is still largely unknown."

When Vicki Margolis, another FDA scientists, revealed that the FDA has only conducted tests for the effects of one element of Corexit, Markey seemed shocked.

"You're sitting here as the FDA, representing the public's interest in determining whether or not these fish are safe to eat, it is without having completed the study in terms of these actual chemical components inside the fish, is that right?" Markey asked.

FDA's Kraemer explained that because many of the untested components in the dispersant are commonly found in lip gloss and over-the-counter drugs, the government assumes the danger from ingesting them should be low.

"We believe that the fish coming out of the Gulf do not have levels that are of concern," he said. When pressed by Markey, he said the levels are estimates for a 170 pound man, and not for children, pregnant women or other more vulnerable people.

At several points in the hearing, witnesses from NOAA and the FDA deflected questions to each other. When no witness could tell Markey whether the federal government is monitoring seafood for high levels of heavy metals like mercury, which comes from oil, Markey equated the two agencies to a "regulatory black hole."

The nothing-to-worry-about tone of the first panel changed radically when a second panel of witnesses, made up of scientists and Louisiana fishermen, toldl Markey about their experiences.

Dean Blanchard, the largest dockside shrimp broker in the U.S., said he eats Gulf shrimp most days, but has a hard time convincing some customers at his business in Louisiana that the seafood is safe. "When I try sell seafood, I tell people the government said they did thousands of tests and they say everything is all right," Blanchard said. "And they say, is that the same government that said 1,000 barrels a day was leaking out of the well?"

The vice president of the Louisiana Shrimpers Association, Acy Cooper, said he does not trust the government's statements either, especially claims that most of the oil is out of the Gulf. "NOAA keeps saying the oil's not there," Cooper said. "But we know it's there."

Witnesses also said that BP should not be allowed to pull out of the Gulf based on its assertion that the recovery phase of the disaster is over.

"We understand that the government wants to turn the corner and wants to signal that the Gulf is on its way to recovery," said Lisa Suatoni of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "However the facts simply do not bear that out. There is still a huge amount of oil in the environment."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

32 Comments

Filter by:
boniatony

Unfortunately, the Feds will side with business until the body count becomes impossible to ignore. Then they flip and attack business. That was a lot of oil. If the oil was eaten or dispersed, it was done so in the Gulf of Mexico by lower food chain creatures. Which are eaten by higher food chain creatures. And so on. The oil will disappear from the Gulf of Mexico by fishing the bigger creatures higher in the food chain. Eventually ending up in us. I think we'll see a rise of new symptoms and unique health problems in the future for this area. I wonder how the Feds will pay for this healthcare after some deal is done with BP to either limit or cap their liability? (Yes, of course you know that's in the works! You think the Feds will let BP cut their loses and pull out of the US market?)

September 20 2010 at 12:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
knute9

Do you think the government would lie to us, risking our health, just to protect BP from extensive liability?

August 22 2010 at 9:59 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
punnster

When those government scientists go down to the Gulf and eat a wide sampling of the shrimp with no bad results, I will seriously doubt their credibility.

August 21 2010 at 10:58 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sysaphus71

Yeah, now tell me again where exactly did all that oil go...... Now I know the gulf is big but 50 million gallons can't just turn into Mazola

August 20 2010 at 6:57 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
ettu

Wonder if they are serving any Gulf seafood in the Capitol Hill cafeteria?

August 20 2010 at 2:36 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
uwash1956

Let them eat it then I wont be buying it

August 20 2010 at 2:28 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Mzhuf

I would not trust anything anyone from this government said. If it is so safe, I think they should been seen live on tv eating it! I for one will not eat gulf seafood from the affected area, and I live in Texas, until I am very sure it is safe.

August 20 2010 at 1:45 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
All About Plants

I Live on the Gulf Coast And Would Not Eat Any Of The Fish Coming Out Of This Water.

August 20 2010 at 1:37 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
solar steam

very sad state of affairs this country has right now-very sad.

August 20 2010 at 1:31 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Carol

Are you kidding me? The FDA has only tested for the effects of 1 element? And they still think it is safe? Government scientist saying the fish is safe, yet no new testing is being done? Personally, I am not going to be eating fish from the gulf for a long time. I don't trust the FDA. I don't think they are looking out for the best interest of the people, more like the best interest of whatever company is lining their pockets at the momement. I hope someone who knows what they are doing, with no hidden agenda, gets in there and conducts real testing, before people start getting sick and it's too late to do anything about it.

August 20 2010 at 1:22 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>