AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Scott is spending his own money but has too many problems to be elected. McCollum is being supported by all the special interest who are looking for something if he is elected. You need to ask what are they looking for. US Sugar gave $250,000 and are trying to sell their land to the state to save the Everglades. They are looking to get McCollum in office so they can get millions more than the containated land is worth. When Sink was running for CFO the only thing the Republicans could compain about her was that she did what all the banks did, buy smaller banks and causing the employees of the smaller banks to be out of a job.
August 22 2010 at 3:07 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyFloridians........are you paying attention to what these candidates have done in the past. It is time for NEW BLOOD. This from Wikipedia: "Despite 39 audits dating back to 2000 warning of risky investments involving leveraged funds, the Florida State Board of Administration lost approximately one-third of the fund ($61.4 billion) between July 2008 and January 2009. The fund has since recovered over $30 billion in losses. Nineteen of these audits warning of risk were issued while Crist, Sink, and McCollum were trustees, and Sink was functioning as CFO of the state and treasurer on the SBA board. As a result of this "crisis of confidence" SBA executive director Coleman Stipanovich resigned his job in December 2007." THIS DOES NOT PAINT A ROSY PICTURE FOR SINK, CRIST, OR MC COLLUM. Do you really want one of these candidates watching over YOUR money?
August 22 2010 at 2:36 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyI am always concerned by candidates who spend a fortune of their own money to get elected. Call me cynical, but it appears to me that if they'll dump millions to get that position; how many more millions do they intend for it to pay them back. Remember, rich businessmen rarely spend unless the payback is better than the investment.
August 22 2010 at 9:10 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI would far sooner trust the candidate that spends their own money. Look at the Obama campaign. Spent YOUR money, and now that he is POTUS, whether you voted for him or not, YOUR money is once again being taken to pay back the supporters: Unions, both public and private, financial institutions, lawyers, BigPharma, etc. Individual taxpayer funding of campaigns is the only way this mess of big money will be eliminated from buying elections. Either way, I would rather only have to pay once, not donate to elect someone, and then have to pay again to reimburse the big money boys.
August 22 2010 at 2:25 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNews is reporting (not yours of course) that the Republican Party of Florida spent almost ALL of its money campaigning for McCollum against Scott, leaving almost nothing for the election after the primary or other candidates. This is the SAME organization Greer was head of. They've sunk our party backing McCollum for this race. At this point, at least we'd have Scott's money for ads, if he wins.
August 21 2010 at 5:56 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
5 Comments