Lisa Murkowski Trails Joe Miller in Alaska Senate Race

I love how the media calls Miller's lead a "slim" lead. He was out spent 20 to 1 and is leading period. Murkowski lost because she lost touch with the Republican party, she voted with democrats more than any other Republican (other than olympia snowe, and susan collins)

It is really quite dissapointing to see two women, who are obviously very bright and strong-willed, have such a vile distaste for one another. My HOPE would be that they would be a part of the CHANGE and civility that is needed in national politics. America needs these two ladies to be uniters, not dividers.

Why is it the media just follows the story line without checking any facts? There is no anti-incumbent frenzy out there. A very few incumbents have lost; just a handful. But, the headlines always claims otherwise. Why do you always allow the spin doctors to tell you what to print. Perhaps that's because you're not real journalists, at least when compared to real newspaper journalists.

Who is rachel maddow? I stopped listening to any radio or T.V. "personalities". They all, whether left or right, seem to fade into blah, blah, blah very quickly. I doubt too many of the senators who have served a long time will be overturned in the elections. They have a lot of money behind them, plus as in the case of Mr. Reid, here in Nevada, friends in the media.

remember if there is a 40 seat turn over in the House, giving GOP control, it still is less then 10% turn over, incumbants or party seat mostly will remain the same.

Lunch42: I would be very skeptical of ANYTHING coming from the Maddow show. It's often not research, but slant. I'm sure she came up with 98% SOMEHOW, to make her point, but did it include dog catchers? Bottom line: I watched her from time-to-time, and saw thing I found interesting - only to later find it was pure slant & spin. You see, I read a lot (from Newsweek on the left to National Review on the right) to get a fair perspective. NOBODY does more selective editing and spin than Maddow (except perhaps Obermann). You have to sort out the spin from the truth, and unfortunately, when sorting out, Maddow is among the 1st to go. Anyone who says there is not anti-incumbent fever, is out-of-touch with America, and we've already seen it in key races. Of course most will return to DC, but it only takes a few key races to alter the balance of power. Yes, there is an anti-incumbent sentiment today, and if you follow the polls, and anti-democrat sentiment that is reaching fever pitch. Dr. G. (a loyal democrat - until recently)

Best news I have heard to-day. If she is anything like her father as far as being anti environmental then I hope she loses. JMO

We just came back from Washington DC. We could instantly notice the tremendous wealth and amounts of money flowing around DC, suburban Virginia and suburban Maryland. It seemed like everybody in the DC area was driving a Lexus, Jaguar, Mercedes, Range Rover, Porsche or BMW. It was shocking to see. We needed little more proof that there's way, way, way too much of OUR money obscenely flowing straight into Capitol Hill. And if you think for one second that Republicans are any less guilty of this travisty than the Dems, you're a gigantic fool.

I love it.. " Voting with Democrats" equates :treason, eating your young, stupidity and ignorance among other virtues.. doesn't it ??? How many graves at Arlington are Americans who chose the Democratic party ?

We are ousting them one by one. :)