Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Voters Sour on Health Care Reform, but Impact on Midterms May Be Slight

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
As the midterm elections approach, voters' views of the health care reform measure that passed earlier this year have soured, but only about a quarter of them say they will look at a congressman's vote for reform as a reason to vote against him or her, according to a Kaiser Health Tracking Poll conducted Aug. 16-22.

Forty-five percent now have a very or somewhat unfavorable view of the law, with 12 percent undecided, compared to July's results, in which 50 percent expressed a favorable view compared to 35 percent who saw it unfavorably, with 14 percent undecided. Looking just at the voters whose feelings were the strongest, 19 percent see the law "very" favorably compared to 32 percent who see it "very" unfavorably.

Sixty-nine percent of those who view it unfavorably favor repealing it as soon as possible, while 28 percent say it should be given a chance to work with Congress making necessary adjustments along the way.
Health care
The Kaiser poll reflects sentiment that Rasmussen Reports has found in its surveys of individual states -- where, with the exception of only a handful, voters favor repeal and oppose the requirement in the law that all Americans must obtain insurance. The Rasmussen polls also found the strongest feelings on the issue to be among those who dislike the measure.

The three biggest reasons for opposition cited by 75 percent or more of those surveyed are that the country can't afford to pay for reform right now, that the measure gave government too big a role and that the law was produced by too much behind-closed-doors dealmaking. Forty-six percent had an unfavorable view because they felt the measure didn't go far enough in expanding coverage or controlling costs.

The rise in the overall negative view of the measure comes despite the fact that the poll found majorities or pluralities expecting the law to be somewhat or very successful in achieving four of five objectives: reducing the amount of money average Americans must pay for health care and insurance; expanding health care to the uninsured; improving the quality of health care; and better regulating health insurers. However, by a 50 percent to 46 percent margin, voters said they didn't believe that reform would reduce the total amount the country spends on health care.

Health care ranks second -- although it's a distant second -- to the economy in terms of its importance as an issue in this year's elections. Forty-nine percent cite the economy as the top issue, 27 percent name health care and 11 percent say immigration.

Thirty-five percent say that a congressman's vote in favor of the health care measure will make no difference in their choice of whom to support in November, 30 percent say such a vote would make it much more or somewhat likely they'd vote for that lawmaker while 24 percent said they would oppose someone who voted for the legislation.

Follow Poll Watch on Twitter

Visit the Poll Watch Home Page and see all the latest polls in one place

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

35 Comments

Filter by:
autumn7777777

It.s all about them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! All kids111111111111111111111111111 GET IT> Standing Down.

September 01 2010 at 3:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
autumn7777777

How about a parade in new york on 911!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

September 01 2010 at 3:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
autumn7777777

Parade for the vet's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

September 01 2010 at 3:13 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
autumn7777777

Fly the flag for the vets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

September 01 2010 at 3:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
autumn7777777

Are you rich or poor?????? Are your nedications paid for?? Are you black or white? Are you a returning fallen angel??? Are you from Marine ONE!!??? Semper FI. Or are you a MIA who has never been forgotten???? How were you treated when returning from Viet Nam . . . . . . . . . . . Marguerite Michalik

September 01 2010 at 3:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rob & Kathy

Obama is swimming upstream against the American people...

August 31 2010 at 5:26 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
wmkingsman

I love Nancy Pelosi's logic. " Pass the healthcare bill....THEN we'll tell you what's in it." Time to retire, Nancy. You're starting to sound like your counterparts.

August 31 2010 at 3:58 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
drbuckles

The problem is that politics got in the middle of the debate and so we ended with what we have, when they should have taken the Insurance industries antitrust exemption away from them and put caps on how much they make off of you, just as they do in Germany. The whole idea that health insurance should be for profit is just wrong when share holders drive the comapnies to make profit by getting rid of high risk people, a from of cherry picking. That's why when the health bill, called socilism by the right wingers, passed it's stock went up, because they are getting more custormers. So where's the connection to soicalism?????????

August 31 2010 at 3:33 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply
drbuckles

Wasn't the debate over weather to have single payer or not? And what did we end up with? You see the health insurance industry wrote the bill becasue the Republicans and the corporate Democrats didn't want to create any competition for the already monopolies of health insurance companies who have antitrust exemptions. So what happened is that the government passed regulating them to the states, and if your state is real cozy with them, they will do nothing about regulating how much health care they give you, after they take their profits of 30%. If there was a single payer plan then it would provide an incentive for them to keep prices low. This is called crony capitlism..............with your lives being used as leverage on Wall Street.

August 31 2010 at 3:10 PM Report abuse -4 rate up rate down Reply
CONWAYS

It's not just Health Care, it's the Demos wish to NATIONALIZE AND SOCIALIZE everything of Value. Here's hoping that the American People understand what this means, and that they REJECT IT SOUNDLY in November. By the way, 90% of the PEOPLE I KNOW feel the same way!

August 31 2010 at 3:07 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>