AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
An interesting side note is that Kagan represented Obama on his citizenship lawsuits prior to her become a Supreme Court Justice? Kind of ironic, isn't it?
September 05 2010 at 10:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down Reply@Philip One thing money can't buy you is a "way back" time machine so that you can post a birth announcement in the Hawaiian newpaper the day you were born.
September 04 2010 at 6:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down Replychief251a2:08 PM Sep 4, 2010 (0) vote this comment up (0) vote this comment down To become President, you MUST be born on American soil. I am American by birth but I am not eligible to become President because I was born in Germany. My parents were both native born American citizens living overseas in the service of the United States and my citizenship is derived from them, but I am not legally considered to be "native born". John McCain was born in the Canal Zone, which was legally US soil at the time. He is without doubt "native born". Obama, IF born in the state of Hawaii, is native born under the law. If born in Indonesia (or Kenya), he is American by "dint" of his American mother but not - NOT - native born under the laws governing who may become President. I personally have no opinion either way - with enough money, you could "prove" that George Washington was a Martian! And - both major political machines have that much money and both are sufficiently corrupt to try. But exactly where Obama was born DOES MATTER! And I do believe that his birthplace should be determined beyond a shadow of a doubt.'''''''''''''''' WRONG, first McCain was born outside the Zone. 2nd you could run. it states ((Natural Born)) meaning naturalized like Arnold can Not run...but to be Natural born only require s 1 Parent be citizen at time of Birth. so even though McCain was foreign born he can run
September 04 2010 at 3:15 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyConsidering all the challanges to Obama's birth and qualification to hold office by much higher courts than this, I think that would be presedent enough and considered a fact. When a presedent is set by a court decision, subsequent cases that cite that presedent don't require all the evedence that was considered in making the initial decision. This is no different. Believe me, President Obama is not my President of choice, but as a US citizen and a military retiree, just like all others, he is my President and will remain so until replaced. If you don't like it, get over it and work on getting your canadate of choice in office in 2012.
September 04 2010 at 1:59 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyWow. I posted a quote of Hawaiian law which describes the difference between a Certification of Live Birth, and its Certificate of Live Birth. Apparently, that isn't allowed here, because it hasn't shown up, though others' posts subsequent to mine have.
September 04 2010 at 1:22 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyThat's just silly.Civil courts have penalties for frivilous cases. I hope this court does as well.
September 04 2010 at 12:35 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyE. Kagan has represented him, prior to her becoming the Supreme Court Justice, so that she can vote on them???
September 05 2010 at 10:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyBoy, the "hate-mongers" are really digging hard to try to discredit the Prez. Why not look at the big picture: He is a man. The Congress consists of men and women. All together they are a big part of our government. Most of it. But one person alone cannot do or cause all the ills attributed to this one man by so many, led, I gather, by FOX. Think, people. One man.
September 04 2010 at 12:15 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyI agree. There was a man in FL, recently, that the Secret Service had to look into, because he made comments about Obama being responsible for all his problems (his loss of work, his losing his house, etc.). Don't people realize this is insanity? First of all, if you are going to blame any one person, it would be more logically, Bush. But, like you said--it would be more than Bush--it would be his administration and those who went along with all the tax cuts for the rich (that put us in a hole), the two wars (which put us deeper and deeper in that hole). Eight years of failed policies, against less than two years of Obama trying to resolve all the problems the previous administration created for the American people, and being obstructed by Republicans every step of the way. The people who hate Obama so much need to open their eyes to the fact that the GOP do not want anything to get better while Obama and the Dems are in power because it would make them look bad and useless. They might lose their jobs--screw yours, they don't care that you can't find a job, pay your mortgage, run out of unemployment! They don't care about Americans that are suffering right now. They are only looking to get their party in power in Nov. and in 2012. Why would anyone want to vote for a party such as that?
September 04 2010 at 7:00 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplySince when does the Chain-of-Command EVER stop at the Pentagon? The Pentagon is the organizational head of the Military, but the people who run the Pentagon take their orders from our duly elected “civilian” President. The Pentagon has no authority to act without this civilian leadership. If Judge Lind continues to stonewall and push the Court into believing the Pentagon, not the President has the final Chain-of-Command authority to issue orders then Judge Lind herself should have no authority to prosecute.
September 04 2010 at 11:25 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyHere's the thing...I'm pretty sure when you run for president that your qualifications are checked pretty thoroughly, like any high level government office. I really don't think he would have ever been allowed to run if he could not prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he met the constitutional requirements. Besides, he's shown his birth certificate, end of story. Also, I could be wrong, but I think his mom was a citizen when he was born. That being the case, it doesn't matter where he was born, he was born a citizen through her. If people have a problem with his policies, then they should attack those. This inane argument about his status just takes focus off of the real issues.
September 04 2010 at 10:34 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyHe should have his medical license revoked permanently, period.
September 04 2010 at 8:24 AM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
22 Comments