AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!The Defense Department investigated only a small percentage out of hundreds of alleged cases of Pentagon employees using government computers to purchase child pornography, according to a Yahoo! News investigation published Friday.
The cases came to light during a 2006 Immigration and Customs Enforcement probe, called Project Flicker, into the use of credit cards and PayPal to buy sexual images of children online. The investigation turned up the names of more than 5,000 individuals who made the porn purchases -- some of whom were civilian and military employees of the Defense Department, including a few with the highest available security clearance.
The Upshot blog reported that ICE turned over to the Pentagon more than 250 names of people who provided military e-mail
addresses or physical addresses with Army or fleet ZIP codes when they purchased the illicit images.
Defense Department records show the Pentagon investigated "only a handful of the cases," according to reporter John Cook:
"..DCIS investigators identified 264 Defense employees or contractors who had purchased child pornography online. Astonishingly, nine of those had "Top Secret Sensitive Compartmentalized Information" security clearances, meaning they had access to the nation's most sensitive secrets. All told, 76 of the individuals had Secret or higher clearances. But DCIS investigated only 52 of the suspects, and just 10 were ever charged with viewing or purchasing child pornography. Without greater public disclosure of how these cases wound down, it's impossible to know how or whether any of the names listed in the Project Flicker papers came in for additional scrutiny. It's conceivable that some of them were picked up by local law enforcement, but it seems likely that most of the people flagged by the investigation did not have their military careers disrupted in the context of the DCIS inquiry."
Of those 264 individuals, 212 were not investigated at all.
Read The Upshot's full report here.
I believe that the reason the Pentagon is not too concerned about the porn situation is because so many in the top echelon are generally perverted to begin with. Those who can condone wanton killing of women, children, and innocent civilians possess a lack of empathy and callousness that can only be considered perversion by normal people. The transition from the perversion of death to the perversion child porn is probably not much of a jump for most of them.
September 05 2010 at 12:24 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI worked for the Sheriff's Office in my county for over 20 years. In a position I held within the office, I was required to make several online purchases a month using a county credit card assigned to my name. At the end of each month I had to submit a statement of charges explaining each purchase on my bill. Often these charges were just a series of numbers that I would have to identify by date ordered, and amount charged. One month I encountered a number of charges totaling over one thousand dollars that I could not cross reference to orders I had placed. When I investigated these charges, I discovered they were for a "centralized" billing service for the purchase of porn. I provided this information to our departments "high tech crime" unit for investigation. The centralized billing service refused to cooperate, and would provide no information. Our dept had no legal resource to compel their cooperation, as the billing service did not contest the disputed charges. People who produce, distribute, or view child porn should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law (and now that I am retired, I will add "punished" appropriately), but investigating this murky world is not easy.
September 04 2010 at 2:34 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyleading world economy: Child Prostitution:(
September 04 2010 at 12:48 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyChild pornography. It is wrong. No child should be associated with useless entertainment. What we have here, more than anything, is a psycho-sexual curiosity that has gone too far and is beginning to affect those who do not care to view it. A person who watches porn is often taken by surprise of images flashing on the screen of children who are posed as sexual images. The viewer can't help this, but that viewer can be arrested for having seen this. It is usually kept on the hard drive. So, it can be traced regardless of the viewer's intention. It is time for all to be brought to task for this and not just those people who can't afford the law suit. Maybe the Supreme Court can have a better chance at it if someone has the money to plead something besides--nolo contendere.
September 04 2010 at 12:30 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyAnd people aren't appalled by this? Paris Hilton's drug bust got more attention...very sad that in this country child porn is lower on the list than all the hollywood dribble. Wonder if everyone would feel nothing if it was their own child in the photos? Disgusting. Every single on of the people who had child porn on their computers should be sentenced and tried and fired from their jobs. I'd love to see a published list of these names.
September 04 2010 at 10:21 AM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyI hope a court order is necessary before a bank or paypal turns over private information to government agencies.
September 04 2010 at 8:23 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Reply1. The investigation turned up the names of more than 5,000 individuals who made the porn purchases. 2.ICE turned over to the Pentagon more than 250 names of people who provided military e-mail addresses or physical addresses with Army or fleet ZIP codes when they purchased the illicit images. 3.and just 10 were ever charged with viewing or purchasing child pornography. Hey how about that! Our governmet in action, that leaves around 4,990 government employees enjoying child porn at work and being paid for it!!
September 04 2010 at 7:59 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyThe government is very selective in prosecuting child porn cases. They choose to prosecute only the most hard core criminals. That would be a teenager who has a nude/seminude photo of theirself or their boyfriend/girlfriend.
September 04 2010 at 7:57 AM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyYou'd think this would be part of the terms of employment for federal workers and dismissing someone for evidence would be clear. At least suspend without pay and benefits while an investigation is going on. Anyone with the defense that someone must of hacked their computer while they were away from their desk is a security risk in itself as the guidelines should strictly detail your responsibility to protect your PC (government property) in your care. It only takes a second to password enable a pc when you step away from your desk and at minimum have and auto screen requiring password to get back in. Anyone that can't deal with that should be given the opportunity to work at a place more fit for their capability. (Perhaps a greeter at Wal-Mart
September 04 2010 at 1:57 AM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyWhat happened to everyone else that bought the porn? They were prosecuted and sentenced right? So what's the hold up? And why are people that endangered Our National Security not even being investigated let alone fired and put in REAL prision. (of course, with what they know...they probably can't go to REAL prision)
September 03 2010 at 8:27 PM Report abuse Permalink +26 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
10 Comments