Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

A Case for Opposing Koran Burning and the Mosque Near Ground Zero

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Yes, Matilda, it is possible to oppose the so-called ground zero mosque AND Florida Pastor Terry Jones' promised burning of the Koran on this year's 9/11 anniversary. In fact, it is more philosophically consistent to simultaneously oppose the mosque and the Koran burning than it is, for example, for New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, to support the building of the mosque AND Jones' claimed right to torch the Islamic holy book.

Jones, who leads a flea circus-sized congregation in Gainesville, Fla., has gained worldwide attention with his personal attempt to spit in the eye of radical Islam. The planned Koran burning is designed to incite violence whether he agrees that's its purpose or not. Videos of that act, if it occurs, will be used by extremists to stoke anti-American violence worldwide.
Most Americans, American Muslims included, sympathize with Jones' wish to send a strong, negative signal to Islamic radicals. At the same time, they are careful to separate Osama bin Laden from Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf -- the would-be builder of the mosque near ground zero, who represents himself as a moderate Muslim trying to build bridges among people of different faiths.
Any rational American understands that most Muslims, and American Muslims in particular, are not radicals who want to kill all Christians and Jews, or bomb New York City. Osama bin Laden, on the other hand, does want to kill people he sees as enemies of radical Islam and he did attack New York City. Yet in promising to burn the Koran, Pastor Jones threatens to insult and incite peaceful Muslims along with radicals.

Related stories on Politics Daily:
From where I sit, the mosque presents an entirely different issue. Its placement about two blocks from ground zero is insensitive to the memories of New Yorkers who lost friends, family members, businesses, jobs and even their beloved city, for a time at least. I was born in Brooklyn and raised in Manhattan. I remember my father telling me after 9/11 that the city he knew and loved and lived in his entire life would never be the same. He has since passed, and his prediction proven wrong. But I still agree with the majority of New Yorkers who believe it is inappropriate to place a mosque near the now-hallowed ground of the 9/11 attacks.
Mosque opponents often invoke Pope John Paul II's 1993 decision to relocate a Carmelite nuns convent at the entrance to the Auschwitz concentration camp. Although the facts of that case are often cited incorrectly, the story can still provide guidance for New Yorkers who oppose the mosque and for moderate Muslims such as Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf.
The Catholic Church was in the process of planning an interfaith memorial for Jewish and non-Jewish victims of the Holocaust. The convent was invaded by a protesting rabbi who did not want any reference to Christianity made on what he called "hallowed ground." Since so many Jews died in the Holocaust, he and many others did not want an interfaith building right next to the entrance to Auschwitz, diluting the fact that Hitler's main goal was to eradicate the Jewish faith. In an apparent effort to diffuse the controversy, the pope told the nuns to move.

Rational people can debate whether the interfaith center was a good idea or not. But an interfaith center instead of a mosque-cum-Islamic community center seems to me to be a better resolution of the ground zero controversy than what Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is planning to build. Perhaps he should consider a center celebrating unity among Muslims, Christians and Jews. What a loud yet peaceful message that would send.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

4 Comments

Filter by:
strtphilosopher

The planned community center, which is designed to be 13 stories tall, is meant to serve the entire community. That any person would immediately think that a Mosque near ground zero is disrespectful speaks volumes about how out-of-touch we are as a nation. If anyone feels that an Islamic community center, planned to be contsructed in an abandoned building near the site of a terrible attack, is wrong, that means that those people are equating Islam with terrorism, plain and simple. Islam is no easier thought of as a way to take faith too far than any incarnation of Christianity could be. I could just as easily equate Christianity with terrorism, and it would be easier to do: The Bible tells believers to spread the word and recruit followers. Not only that, but how many people actually say that they follow the word of God, or what is printed in the Bible, yet angrily try to convince people that no other perspective could be correct. Not very Jesus-esque. On the flipside, the Quran says that to find a home in the Islamic faith, one must do so on their own, and if they choose not to, their decision must be respected. No pressure, just information. While of course the assumption that anyone who doesn't find truth in Islam is considered an "infidel" which is an English word anyway and not exactly correct, the Bible warns of non-believers going straight to hell, and being more susceptible to "the works of the devil." All-in-all, I'm more and more convinced that false moderate claims such as the ones here by Columnist Erbe, are truly just racism in disguise. Let's be honest about thinking that Islam is a terroristic religion, and stop trying to hide behind the 9/11 pain. If anyone is to blame for hatred around the world, we must include in the blame game the United States and our allies who believe we are better than everyone else. I love my country, but I don't have to love our working policies, nor do I have to love my fellow Americans who can't move past their own internal hatred and fear of the "other" in today's world. What I can do, is say that I hope we collectively come to our senses, and leave our filthy anger behind us.

September 12 2010 at 5:18 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
gatorsden1963

COM ON AMERICA THIS IS 9 11 YOU HAVE YOUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS ALL OVER THE WORLD TRYING TO HELP PEOPLE THAT ARE MURDERING THEM EVEYDAY.STEP UP AND BE COUNTED.VOTE OUT THE POLITICIANS THAT ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOBS!IT DOES'NT MATTER WHAT SOCALLED PARTY YOU BELONG TO.FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHT TO BE HEARD!TALK TO YOUR FAMILY FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS SCREAM IT FROM THE MOUNTAIN TOPS.POLITICIANS ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FAILURES.WE AS WORKING AMERICANS ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR OUR FAILURES.CORPORATIONS GOT RICH HERE YET THEY SEND OUR JOBS TO COUNTRIES THAT COULD CARE LESS OUR COUNTRY IS GOING UNDER ASLONG AS THEIR WALLETS ARE FAT.BOYCOTT THE PRODUCTS THEY SELL .THIS IS NOT PROTECTIONISM,AS THE WHITE HOUSE REFUSES TO BELEIVE.THIS IS SURVIVAL! FOR "AMERICANS"

September 11 2010 at 7:27 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
vlddanny

We don't want US civilians to intentionally damage or destroy Qurans, while the military does just that when they blow up Quran holding terrorists. Will the military now warn terrorists before we blow them up, so they can protect their Quran from harm before the attack?

September 10 2010 at 11:20 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
rosey431

letting the muslim terrorists win: 1) cancelling a free speech act of burning korans. 2) not moving downtown mosque because of threats of violence. Islam must be declared "not a religion", and be unprotected under freedom of religion rights. Mohammedism, Islam, Muslim, call it what you will, is not a religion, but nothing but a violent movement. is this ok, mr. comment moderation editor?

September 10 2010 at 7:58 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
allisonisa39e

The translations of the Koran are considered as scriptural aids and paraphrases. The burning of the translated items should not be considered as burning of the Koran. (Unless someone is looking for an excuse to murder others). Even then the injunction to "Hate your enemy mildly: he may become your friend one day" should be followed, though those looking for an excuse will ignore this.

September 09 2010 at 9:40 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
allisonisa39e

An interfaith center is a good idea. Part of the problem with a Mosque is that they have been used as a place to stash weapons and because we trust that they are a Church we don't believe in sending in troops to search them. Our trust has been betrayed many times. I would trust that the Muslims living in our Country would not be involved in terrorism but there have been exceptions. I am a little less trusting then I once was.

September 09 2010 at 8:27 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
letmebeclear54

As a citizen, I believe that members of flea-circus sized flock have the same right to freedom of speech and religion as anyone else in this country.

September 08 2010 at 7:59 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
trb2244

I hardly believe it: common sense (read, "You agree with me. LOL") from a Politics Daily writer... what's the world coming to?

September 08 2010 at 7:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>