Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Campaign 2010: Democrats, Calm Down. Really?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Last time we chatted (see here and here), I noted that Democrats and progressives were becoming rather impatient with President Obama, fearing he was leading his party to a historic defeat in November that would result in the Republicans probably gaining control of the House and possibly even the Senate. Obama seemed to have been piddling about regarding the No. 1 issue: the economy. And a whiff of panic was in the air.

Scratch all that. Everything is fine now. Dems are doing just great. Obama's on a roll. Okay, I'm being a bit facetious. But maybe the gloom -- or that high level of gloom -- was premature. Part of that panic was caused by a Gallup poll showing the GOP with a 10-point lead over the Democrats. This made it seem that 2010 was going to be 2012 -- as in the disaster movie -- for the D's. But as Bruce Drake points out, a Gallup survey that came out this week had the Democrats and Republicans tied. Big difference. Meanwhile, Obama on Wednesday delivered a rock-'em/sock-'em speech outside Cleveland that demonstrated he can still come across as a decisive fighter. And Democrats could dare to hope: If Obama keeps slugging, if the polls are close, maybe, just maybe, we'll dodge a bullet, sidestep the falling piano, weather the storm, and manage to retain control of the House and Senate (albeit with small majorities).

On Thursday, The Democratic Strategist -- a newsletter put out by leading Democratic analysts Stan Greenberg, Ruy Teixeira, and William Galston -- released a paper fueling such hope. It began:
In recent days, as increasingly negative projections regarding the November election have appeared, a substantial number of Democrats have been seized with a genuine sense of panic. Many political commentaries have tended to suggest...that a major shift in basic attitudes is occurring-that many Americans are now shifting their allegiance to the Republicans and abandoning Obama and the Democrats. Many Democrats have a sinking fear that support for Obama and the Dems is somehow collapsing.
Andrew Levison, the author of the paper, notes something I noticed recently while reviewing polls: Obama's approval rating fell from a high of nearly 70 percent when he took office to the low 50s in the summer of 2009, and ever since it has stayed in the mid-40s-to-50 range. This is no "collapse," he maintains. Levison notes:
Obama was an unusually unfamiliar figure when he took office-certainly in comparison with someone like Hillary Clinton-and voters were extremely uncertain about how and where to classify him within their basic value systems. Obama's early appointments and calls for bipartisanship prolonged this uncertainty and many voters did not reach a final conclusion about him until June or July of 2009 when the ambitious scope of the health care bill finally convinced them that Obama was indeed basically a liberal or progressive Democrat.
This may not be the best news for Obama and the Democrats -- after all, Obama put that uncertainty to good use during the campaign -- but, Levison says, it does not mean that "major shifts are occurring in attitudes and that large numbers of Obama's former supporters are now sharply turning against him." Obama is now merely seen as a liberal president. When unemployment is near 10 percent, an approval rating in the 45-to-50 percent range is no surprise. (President Reagan and President Clinton each were in the low 40s, as they approached their first mid-term elections.)

As for the bouncing poll numbers about the congressional elections, Levison offers this useful observation: "The idea that people reconsider their basic party affiliation on a week-to-week basis runs counter to virtually everything we know about political partisanship and even at first glance it is clear that the movement in these views is limited to a relatively small group." The swings being picked up by the polls are not so great, he contends. There are no big shifts underway: "The fact that the elections this November may shift the balance of power in Congress is basically due to the fact that America is still essentially the same '50-50 nation' that it was in 2000. As a result of this sociological reality extremely small changes--such as a lower participation of pro-Obama demographic groups relative to others in off year election--can easily shift control of Congress."

In other words, Obama's triumphant win in 2008 did not mark a strategic realignment (as some Democrats might have wished), just as George W. Bush's win-with-an-asterisk in 2000 did no such thing (despite Karl Rove's best spin). And here's Levison's bottom line: "Democrats, calm down and regain some perspective. Yes, we'll suffer losses this fall, but there's actually not any profound anti-Obama or pro-Republican attitude shift going on."

If the Republicans do seize the House because of small changes, that will be small comfort for the Democrats. That recent Gallup poll that had the Ds and Rs even (among registered voters) also found the Democrats on the wrong end of a 25-point enthusiasm gap. Half of Republican voters told Gallup they were fired up to vote in the coming congressional elections; only 25 percent of Democrats said the same. This is no small matter. If voters are split roughly equally between Republican and Democratic candidates, but Republican voters are twice as eager to vote, the math ain't tough.

Which brings us back to small changes--because there likely won't be any big changes in the economy between now and the elections. If Obama can rev up Democratic voters and win back some independents, and if his party can get everything right in terms of mechanics (fundraising, advertising, get-out-the-vote efforts, etc.), then perhaps with all these small changes the Democrats have a chance of protecting their House majority. Nevertheless, a poll here, a speech there only offers so much reassurance. Democrats should keep the panic button close by. It still might come in handy.

You can follow David Corn's postings and media appearances via Twitter.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

27 Comments

Filter by:
ddd

One poll does not a reversal of fortune make. Real Clear Politics has the GOP 7.6 points ahead in the national poll average. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/generic_congressional_vote-901.html

September 11 2010 at 3:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
snrar

I have to ask Is he kidding himself or is he really that out of touch with what Americans have been talking about for the last 6 months ! Things are not working , People are not working ! David get a grip and face the facts .

September 10 2010 at 11:41 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
botfeeder

"Most of the Democrats who voted for Obamacare are now trying to disown it...." I actually came across one Democrat defending Obamacare, my own Congressman, Brian Baird. The guy, by the way, is not running for re-election .........................

September 10 2010 at 11:23 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Rob & Kathy

Most of the Democrats who voted for Obamacare are now trying to disown it....

September 10 2010 at 10:47 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
valwayne

9.6% UNEMPLOYMENT and going up! More corrupt spending and debt than in the history of the world! An Economy going back into recession! Radical left wing policies that have totally failed and severely damaged the nation! I agree! Democrats should relax, they have nothing to worry about!!

September 10 2010 at 9:09 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
skep41

If David Corn is right he will be hailed as the only person smart enough to have spotted the turn of the trend. If you throw the polls out and just look at the primaries and special elections since Scott Brown, focusing on turnout, the tale is pretty frightening for the Democrats. Its like saying that Obama-mania was a mirage two years ago and McCain really had a shot. This current wave is a wave as strong as the one in 08, its just occurring in a different demographic. The Obama wave was composed of one-time voters, many unlikely to vote again. The counter wave is among likely voter Republicans and independents. They are not likely to stop being angry at the total failure of the Democratic agenda within the next few weeks. No Obama magic will get his voters to the polls.

September 10 2010 at 8:58 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
redikop3

Actually, Mr. Corn is on to something that conservatives can celebrate. Obama's election was, in the end, no big deal. It was due to minor shifts in the electorate, and an enthusiasm gap in 2008. The gains the Democrats made in 2006 and 2008 were unsustainable. The Republicans will make gains in November, perhaps regaining a majority, perhaps mot, but the political scene no matter will be VERY different. I think it goes without saying that the progressives are done, perhaps for a couple of generations. Their agenda has been completely discredited. We will now spend God knows how long cleaning up after this mess, but non-progressive Democrats and Republicans will be working together on the clean-up. The proof is in the tepid response of Democrats to Obama's latest stimulus "plan", and the fact that NO Democrat is running on the health care reform. Instead, they are running away from it. Where I think Corm is wrong is in the long-term outlook. 50-50 nation? Maybe no longer. It is possible that Obama/Pelosi/Reid have awakened the sleeping giant - Americans now realize that what we have can't be taken for granted. Corn is probably wrong, too, in the shorter term analysis. (To be more accurate, I guess, the analysts he discusses are probably wrong.) Obama, who ran as a non-partisan bridge-builder, loses credibility with moderate voters when he plays to his base, as he is doing now. He may ramp up a bit of support from the progressive wing, but at the expense of support from left of center mods. It's a real possibility. As for the band of support for Obama within the mid-40s being not too bad - time will tell. His trajectory is down, down, down - especially amongst likely voters, and his approval ratings on specific issues are generally below his overall approval rating. I don't think his approval ratings mean that much yet, but I suspect they will slide down the closer we get to the election and people associate him with the Democrats running closer to him. We'll see, but I think at least one poll will have him down to 37% by November 2.

September 10 2010 at 6:46 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
botfeeder

The polls have been pretty steady with the exception of Gallup's, which are manic depressive. I would say Gallup's poll is only of any use if you take a 90 day moving average. (and then of course it becomes a lagging indicator) There are some good observations in Corn's article: For example: The election of Obama was not a watershed event. (it was largely a vote of no confidence in George Bush, rather than a vote of confidence in the Democrats) The bottom line is that 30% of the public are progressive and 50% of the Congress is. Even in a neutral economy, that is a huge overrepresentation of progressives in Washington. The November elections will go a long way in correcting that disequilibrium. When the Democrats contemplate their losses, they should be consoled in the fact that they mostly lost seats in Congress that didn't really belong to them in the first place.

September 10 2010 at 5:40 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
sysaphus71

David, It is said that one of the first responses by humans to threat or calamity is denial. I am afraid what you have described underscores this sense of denial of the Democrats . It appears the country has soundly and overwhelmingly rejected this forced march to a European /Cloward and Piven social engineering takeover. The one thing that progressives/liberal/socialist ALWAYS underestimate is the number of sovereign individuals that THIS country has created.....they will not bend to the will of an administration with a social engineered coup d'etat in mind. These are the same individuals that take risks and create businesses for themselves ,NOT for the benefit of the government. I will go out on a limb and say that this administration is the least likely to understand ANYTHING about a free and sovereign individuals mindset..... It is too bad because this will be the stumbling block that they will NEVER succeed in converting to the liberal society that this administration is so dead set to establish. The one good thing that has happened with this administration is it has presented it "vision" for the country. The country now has a firm idea of what it DOES NOT WANT TO BE. This could not have happened with a more moderate President...So in some way this may be the only good thing that arises from the first 18 months of this administration.

September 10 2010 at 4:51 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
cheriejae

Maybe it's that I am middle aged but I think the first problem is the constant complaints by liberal pundits who didn't get what they thought they should at first. We have had more progress in 18 months than in decades but we forgot to celebrate and continue working to change. We underestimated the wealth fighting us. The pundits turned people off. Now they have to motivate and most are. Nothing was perfect the first time around but it is pretty darn good. In the meantime we didn't see the insidious forces marshaled against us. Fired UP!

September 10 2010 at 4:44 PM Report abuse -9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to cheriejae's comment
ialbel

Right ... that explains how his voters have deserted the president. Nobody is celebrating anything the president has done. It is all bad news. Clearly he was elected by the independent voters. These same voters are now polling to vote in any other direction. His left wing faithful will contine to blindly follow the party, but read the signs. If Massachusetts didn't tell the dems something, then certainly they don't hear the polls either.

September 12 2010 at 10:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>