AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
2. The so-called "underwear bomber," Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, charged with trying to take down Flight 253 last Christmas, fired his attorneys in federal court Monday and asked his judge: "If I want to plead guilty to some counts . . . basically, how would that go?" There is plenty of precedent for recent terror suspects to short-cut the legal process in this fashion. Richard Reid, the so-called "shoe bomber," did so in 2003. Zacarias Moussaoui did so as well when he was charged with terror conspiracy in the 9/11 attacks. Will Abdulmutallab follow suit?Ilegal immigrants represent millions of Democrat votes. Why we don't get rid of the first group of immigrants who won't learn English, become citizens, pay taxes is beyond me. This is the first immigrant group that has decided NOT to become Americanized, but to be coddled in their native tongue and not become citizens.
September 16 2010 at 6:42 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyGet rid of illegals??? Dems are poised to hand them the "key to the city" and let them take millions of American jobs in 2011, even as Americans stuggle to find work, feed their families and hold on to their homes.
September 16 2010 at 8:22 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyAmerica is in so much trouble....that there is not enough people to "fix it"....America is trying to "save the world" though....instead of trying to "save America".....this will be the downfall of our country....I hope people will GET OUT AND VOTE....put new faces into Washington....and new faces into the local systems....we have to make a "good change" for our country.....so far....nothing has helped....not enough for the AMERICAN people.....we need to turn to GOD and ask HIM to guide this country.....before it is too little, too late....
September 16 2010 at 10:28 AM Report abuse Permalink +16 rate up rate down ReplyWere it not for the activist judges on the federal bench many of these cases would not reach the Supreme Court.
September 16 2010 at 10:14 AM Report abuse Permalink +23 rate up rate down ReplyA Note to JOhn Grisham: I agree with your principle but not with your prerjudice. It seems to me that all women who conspire and abet the murder of their husbands should be executed, post haste. Only then will the principle be equally applied.
September 16 2010 at 10:12 AM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyMy personal opinion is that current members of the Supreme Court do not appear to be inclined to listen to the merits of each case, but rather already have their minds made up for purely political reasons, without even hearing the facts. I have never had less confidence in the Supreme Court than I do now. This is yet another branch of the federal government that is failing to do its job.
September 16 2010 at 10:07 AM Report abuse Permalink +19 rate up rate down ReplyJohn Grisham believes in equlity before the law? How juvenile of him. The system has never and will never have equality before the law. With several states that had the death sentence and since revoked it and the one that never had it and then the one that have it and never use it and the govenors who failed to use it because they didn't want to sign the warrants of execution ( a New Mexico GOvenor comes to mind). The states have their own statutes about the death penalty and how it is to be applied. It is up to the district attorney who is charged with the case to make the decision if he will seek the death penalty and how the individual case merits are used to make the determination. But Grisham wants equality before the law then he is dreaming about utopia. As to prop 8 in California being thrown out by a wishy-washy judge who overroded the citizens of the state, the Governator and Mr Jerry (hows my weed doing) Brown are supposed to back the majority of the state voters and are now doing them a dis-service by burying their heads in the ground. I do hope the 9TH circuit court of appeals stands by Arizona but I have my doubts that a court that liberal will have the cajones to do it. Hopefully When it comes around to have to replace someone on that court it will be a republican president doing it. Not wishing that any die real soon (god forbid the court gets any more liberal) but that they retire due to some mental disorder. I wish the Framers of the Constitution had made the court system one that could have Life limits on the judges where they have to retire after a certian age limt from the courts. It is as bad as having the same senator or representative in teh same seat uhtil the SOB dies.
September 16 2010 at 9:59 AM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down Reply"For evil to flourish, all that is needed is for good people to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
September 16 2010 at 9:52 AM Report abuse Permalink +20 rate up rate down ReplyIf dems are allowed to put illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship as they keep indicating is a top agenda, what is their plan to allow them to apply for jobs in this job market? Why is no one talking about this in Washington left or right?
September 15 2010 at 11:16 PM Report abuse Permalink +31 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
12 Comments