AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!

Court papers call the spot a "smear ad" against Blunt. The network says that by using the Wallace interview, "Defendant harmed the value of the original work by compromising its apparent objectivity."
The ad has been removed from Carnahan's website. YouTube also pulled the spot after being served a notice by Fox, the Reporter said.
The Carnahan campaign has not commented on the lawsuit.
The use of TV interviews and other similar footage is common in campaign commercials.
Read the full court complaint here.
Watch the ad here.
For Fox to complain about "objective" misrepresentation is ludiocrous coming from a network so skewed toward the Tea Party that it might as well be the Lipton network.
September 17 2010 at 4:59 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyFox is complaining that its "apparent objectivity"" is being compromised? That's absolutely hilarious!!!!!
September 17 2010 at 2:29 PM Report abuse Permalink -4 rate up rate down ReplyQuestions don't mean a lot without the answers. I didn't see the answers included.
September 17 2010 at 1:50 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplySo Fox was questioning a candidate thoroughly as they always do and the opponent used that video. hmm.. trying to pull a fast one on Fox news fans but it didn't work. Chris Wallace should stop her from using it because it can take away credibility and trust in Fox if viewers took it for what it seemed. sounds like both candidiates in that race are no good and should kicked to the curb. GO FOX news, I'm happy you're protecting the network's reputation, Fox has earned it's super high ratings and that should be protected. In Tucson we have candidates claim they got police/fire endorsements when they didn't. politicians are liars.
September 17 2010 at 1:46 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyGO FOX NEWS !!!!!
September 17 2010 at 1:44 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplySo Fox got OutFoxed!
September 17 2010 at 1:22 PM Report abuse Permalink -33 rate up rate down ReplyI don't think she was trying to use an excerp of the Wallace/Blunt interview to suggest that Fox was endorsing her. I think she was using it to show Blunt's record and how he wheeled and dealed with Delay, et al. Blunt was very much a part of the GOP movers and shakers at that time and the public should be reminded of how the elected "serve" the electors! Seems like allof them only have two goals. Get elected (or re-elected) then make deals to insure a good job as a lobbyist or consultant after they leave office.
September 17 2010 at 1:08 PM Report abuse Permalink +27 rate up rate down ReplyFox news doesn't seem to like when the tables are turned on them...
September 17 2010 at 12:57 PM Report abuse Permalink -23 rate up rate down ReplyFox hates when it gets a taste of its own medicine
September 17 2010 at 12:46 PM Report abuse Permalink -27 rate up rate down ReplyHello, did anyone ever hear of "public domain?" As in, we the public own the airwaves and no one has proprietary ownership of a TV clip??? Otherwise, how would Jon Stewart be able to cull the absurdities of Fox News on a nightly basis???
September 17 2010 at 12:40 PM Report abuse Permalink -20 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
15 Comments