Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Tea Party Candidate Ken Buck Backtracks on Abortion

3 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
Colorado's GOP nominee for U.S. Senate, Ken Buck, appears to be backing away from pro-life positions he took during the primary campaign.

According to the Denver Post,

No longer would Buck introduce a constitutional amendment to ban abortion -- though he says he would still support one -- and he now says he would be willing to vote to confirm even pro-choice judicial nominees.

Earlier this year, Buck answered another survey saying he would never confirm "pro-abortion" candidates for any government job, including judgeships. But last week, he drew a distinction between pro-choice and pro-abortion candidates, saying he would have no "litmus test" preventing pro-choice candidates from Senate confirmation.

"When I look at that word, pro-abortion, to me that doesn't mean pro-choice, that means someone who is an activist, someone trying to find ways to promote abortions," he said.


Buck's reversal sounds absurd to me. Every conservative I know considers "pro-abortion" to be the same as "pro-choice." It's all about framing the issue (Pro-choicers, likewise, often label pro-lifers "anti-choice.") More likely, Buck's evolving position has to do with politics. Winning a GOP primary required one position, but now that
incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet is attacking him for his socially conservative stances, he is, um, revising his positions.

During the primary, Buck -- who was backed by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) -- handily defeated former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton. Though Norton was a consummate establishment insider, she was also a proven social conservative who helped de-fund Planned Parenthood in Colorado. Clearly, when given the choice, conservatives this year were more interested in electing outsiders than in electing proven social conservatives.

But there is a bigger story here. While the Tea Party is largely a positive force for conservatives -- including social conservatives -- Buck's victory over Norton underscores a trend whereby social conservatives (who dominated politics on the right in the 1990s) are taking a back seat to fiscal conservatives.

Buck's win over Norton may be one more example to suggest that the culture wars, at least as we have known them, are over.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

4 Comments

Filter by:
Queenie

Shame on you, Ken Buck. Even the slaughter of the innocents to get votes. Pro choice is the choice to do what?

September 22 2010 at 10:59 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
nanan1937

Flop flipped flop?

September 22 2010 at 10:28 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
jancf

'Actively promoting abortions'? What garbage. Pro-choice is never pro-abortion. The concept is pure dishonest political spin.

September 22 2010 at 10:21 AM Report abuse +9 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jancf's comment
ckandrus2001

I could not agree more jancf. I have had this argument many times.

September 22 2010 at 11:04 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply

FEATURED VIDEO

View All »

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video »

Follow Politics Daily


Politics Home Page : Roll Call