The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate: Are We Better Off than 50 Years Ago?

I was only 8 when this went on. I could have cared less about who became president. I do remember hearing on the closed circuit TV at school that Kennedy was shot. I watched in absolute terror the workings of our govt soon thereafter. I now believe that kennedy was killed by our own govt. I am usually not a conspirarist theorist, but this one I believe.

I was 20 years old when these debates occurred. Watching this debate, my classmates in college and I were enthralled with the energetic and intelligent senator from Mass. He had quiet dignity with an underlying wit and uncanny ability to come across as a man who truly cared about his country and the citizens within it. We were right. Naming his brother, Robert, was a brilliant move. They had each other to bounce things off of and come up with solutions. Naming Johnson as Vice President was not in anyone's best interest except to get the votes from the south and south west. He would not have remained in the second Kennedy administration. I think we all have a pretty good idea who(plural) really killed the Kennedy brothers. That was the one of the major beginnings of the downfall of this country.

Televised debates are fine; my problem is that these days so many candidates are involved IN them, leaving very little time for some of them to say anything.

No were not better off for it. It was the begining of form is better than substance. Kennedy was young debonair - Nixon looked like death warmed over. Most observers at the time agree Nixon won the debate. But Jack and Jackie made all the magazine covers.

Yes we were better off. I could walk five blocks to school and play outside without any worry of the sordid people roaming the country today. You could leave your home and car unlocked, or leave the window down on a hot day and no one bothered your property. You could sleep out on the beach at night without regulations telling you, no. Prices were less: gas .20 a gallon, milk, $1.00, bread, .25 for a loaf of bread before congress went global and sent our jobs out of the US by not protecting the playing field. We could go out for a walk after dinner and no one bothered you. No one was afraid to hitchhike back. Cuba and the Russian nukes? they wouldn't have challenged Nixon. Kennedy and Johnson took us to Vietnam over ideology when Ho Chi Minh himself helped American pilots during WW2, educated himself in the US, asked for our help against the French and instead of sitting down talking with him 58,000 Americans died and 1 and a half million Vietnamese, for what?

One thing is for sure, on the night of that debate, the media discovered they had stumbled on a gold mine, and ever since, they've been making money hands over fist. Sad thing is, because every passing election cost's more thn the one before, corruptions ( like in buying off politicians) and special interests groups have become a part of the equation .

We as voting citizens have lost our sense of country. We have become a nation of greedy self-interest groups. We vote for the buck in our pocket whether we earned it or not. Politicians are no longer statesmen. For the most part they are conive are devious, and lie by omission. Our political campaigns have become marketing circuses. The media has no sense of propriety. We have become a nation of multi-culturalism where it is more improtant to be SomethingAmerican rather than just American. We don't protect our boundaries. We have been in a leadership void for decades for the most part where big business rules politics. It is a felony to lie to the government but if policticians lie to us its politics. I could go on but to answer the question are we better off today than 50 years ago. No! The above reasons are part of why we are losing the family as the central part of our life. It is maybe the most tragic failing of all. As a side note I would have gladly given up going to the moon 50 years ago in place of putting our destiny at the hands of big oil especially big oil in the near east. Burton Patrick Pittsburgh

Kennedy in a press conference,took the entire blame for the Bay of Pigs fiasco.After that,his popularity took off. Compared to Bush junior,I dont remember any mistakes I made and the current president who seems to pass the buck in the blame department,yes bring those days back.

I lived through all of this kiddies. I watched the debates. Kennedy was more prepared, had drilled in the issues while 'Tricky Dick' palyed his usual illusive politician game. It made him look exactly like what he was, a BAD politician and leader...If we would have learned then, he wouldn't have extended the Vietnam War so I could be wounded in it and also WOUND the country in a way that we still have not completely recovered from its aftermath. On the other hand, though he was not perfect, Kennedy DID save us from a nuclear war and if he would have lived we would have NEVER made the horrible mistake of Vietnam that caused over 58,000 nineteen year old men their lives [19 was the average folks], as I said I should know I barely missed being added to that number. By the way, that's the main reason he was murdered whether you believe it or not. The debates did all that and something live debates have never done before, showed presidential candidates under tremendous pressure answering questions live. You know like they would do or are supposed to do under actual pressured issues? From my view they were the demonstration that our digital age makes it too easy to cover the flaws of men running for office...something they could not do then and SHOULD NOT be doing now.

My dear Walter, I must disagree with your last statement: "I sometimes wonder if American politics might not been better off today if Kennedy and Nixon had somehow missed their rendezvous with history at WBBM 50 years ago." I was a college coed in a Freshman debate class when the assignment was given to the class of writing a critique of this television debate. There was a collective sigh, if not groan, from the class. A television political debate was certainly NOT in my Freshman coed brain at this time in my life. I would never have chosen to sit and critique a boring, black and white political debate with two "old" men I knew nothing about. I was ignorant of everything political. However, I was a good student and was immeditately intrigued as a tackled the assignment...it was so clear-cut. I remember the pallor of Nixon and the movie star tan of Kennedy. The gaping collar and the sagging jaw of Nixon were distracting. One was in his prime and the other seemed seedy, uptight and a bit "shifty." Content and presentation were as glaringly different, even to me. I got an "A" on the critique and was commended on giving full contrast to the speaking styles and appearance and content of the two men's presentations. I remember it as though it were yesterday...I became interested in politics from that one event. A teacher with vision made that assignment. I am thankful that one telecast 50 years ago awakened my interest and zeal to know more...