Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Americans Are Angry, All Right -- But at What?

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
"Sterilize black women, problem solved."
That is just one comment -- with plenty of recommends -- that accompanies a Washington Post story on poor children in Washington, D.C., and its suburbs. The article uses census statistics to show three out of 10 children in the District live in poverty, "with the number of poor African American children rising at a breathtaking rate."
The details of the piece are horrifying, asides from readers even worse. I didn't need a story -- though the Associated Press has written one -- to tell me that the anonymous dialogue tagged onto web articles has gotten rougher, particularly at the mention of race. Politics Daily has done its part to keep a civilogue, with mixed success.
In the Post story, the U.S. Census figures, of course, reveal that poverty may hit some harder than others, but it knows no color. Struggling to pay the bills is a shared experience. That didn't stop the commenter from offering the genius idea of forced sterilization on all the black women in America. Eugenics. Now there's an idea Hitler would love.
Every discussion about the mood of the day talks about the throw-the-bums-out anger of the electorate. You can't miss it if you attend any political meeting or rally. People are mad at the banks, the unions, the government, undocumented immigrants, Muslims, their neighbors.
New York GOP gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino -- the proud poster child for free-floating anger -- is getting both love and condemnation from the public he wants to represent for frequent outbursts. His e-mails, which some consider racist and sexist, his foibles and those of his staffers are seen as a sign of rough authenticity.
Expressing anger and incivility is seen as a First Amendment protected, politically incorrect right. Who knew the anonymity of comments and e-mails would prompt so many people to revel in it?
But one thing hardly registers any sort of sustained outrage. Revelations about the poor drop off the radar before the end of a single news cycle. Children in poverty? The anger such stories generate is disproportionately directed at the poor themselves. They don't want to work, it's assumed, despite the long lines and hundreds of resumes that greet the hint of any job opening. The parents, many say, are all lazy people having children they can't afford and preying on morally upright taxpayers everywhere. Motherhood is the most sacred of professions, unless, of course, the mother is poor. Then, she'd best get a job, any job, even if it takes her away from her child.

It's not that I think every mom is a halo-bedecked Madonna. But I'd assumed that most people would agree that every child in America deserves a chance.
So it puzzles me, this lack of any sympathy for the children, the future of the country, the ones who could grow up to discover the cure for cancer or lupus or AIDS if only they get a healthy breakfast in the morning and a good education the rest of the day.
Why must a child born into a family below the poverty line live a life of lost potential and hope because of the luck of the draw and the harsh judgments meted out to parents?
Americans can muster the anger and energy to force a showdown with "Sesame Street" because Katy Perry shows Elmo a little cleavage? (Hey, if you're a little kid, it's just lunch.)
But if you're poor, kid, you'd better learn to eat insults.
Filed Under: Race Issues, Woman Up, Economy

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

31 Comments

Filter by:
dc walker

When I first came to Washington in 1966 all the cab drivers were black and very few worked in my office building. When I returned in 1974 there were two black girls in my office and some of the security guards were black. When I returned in 2000 half my co workers were black, all of the security guards were black and most of the cab drivers were from mid east countries. When I retired in 2007 I had met and worked with many blacks who were talented, worked hard, made me laugh and whom today I'm proud to say we can still go out and have a laugh at lunch. Don't close your eyes to other Americans because they look different, help them if they need it, your life will be the better for it.

October 02 2010 at 7:47 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
bozz

Fascism. Corporations running the government. All our problems stem from it. From Cheney's corrupt, collusion committing Halliburton to the scumbag polluters Monsanto and their GMO filth and desperation to ban real food, to sleazy pirates Goldman Sachs to freakin murderous BP destroying half the country forever, not to mention Baxter (Donald Rumsfeld owns that, no surprises here) with their phony profiteering "pandemic" which was down to them giving out live vaccines, OOOops... These monsters are never held accountable and are beyond criminal. They are the destroyers of our sovereignty. Our government is more interested in appeasing terrorists and hostile invader than protecting Americans from vultures. Our weak, gutless, treasonous Congress will do anything for a bribe. That's what I am pissed about. What's so hard to understand? They want to ban anything healthy, force poison in about 87,000 forms onto us, tell us to eat corexit laden fish and lie about everything. Is this directionless anger, I don't think so , state run media, politburo...

October 02 2010 at 4:43 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
allisonisa39e

There will always be people that are poorer then others. If the lowest paid worker made a million dollars a year then that would be a poor person as all others were making more. When salaries go up then it costs more to produce products as everyone along the line is receiving higher wages. These costs are then reflected in the price the product sells for. SO: The Union leader that gets you a raise will himself take more money. As he produces nothing that will raise costs and you are actually worse off.

October 02 2010 at 1:49 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Norma

The last administration used the term we went to war with the information we had even if it was not perfect.Now when the Obama administration came in in the midst of crisis that was presented as we must do something right away we couldn't wait,we went on with the bailouts based on the information that we had and now this administration is getting all the anger.Where was the anger the last 8 years?We accepted everything that the Bush administration told us.I believe it was VP Cheney that said deficits don't matter and we accepted this. Lets give this administration the same courtesy. Norma

October 02 2010 at 1:41 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
allisonisa39e

Poor does not mean stupid. Abraham Lincoln did not start as a well to do child. He had to educate himself. He became one of our greatest presidents. Presidents Truman and Eisenhower did not start as wealthy persons, they also became Presidents. Did you ever hear about the wealthy parents of Einstein, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet or the Walton Family - Well no one else did either. Thee were no Government handouts so that they could get ahead. THEY did it. The Government only promotes mediocrity.

October 02 2010 at 1:40 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
cityguy60640

Ms. Curtis I get your point... The comments you are talking about are clearly insensitive and frankly cruel. However, I think the real frustration with child poverty statistics is with the cycle of poorly educated women of ALL races who are having multiple children often times out of wed lock and while already living in poverty. No responsible adult should bring a child into the world without the means to support it. Now we aren't talking about the youthful misjudgment here or a family that's fallen on hard times. We are talking about folks having two, three and even more children sometimes with multiple fathers and no possible way to support their kids. I have personally seen this and in my humble opinion it's comparable to child abuse. We despite the efforts of some, live in a country where women have the right to choose an abortion. We as a society believe women have the right to control their own body and terminate a pregnancy. Conversely a woman also needs to be responsible about a childs conception. Now I completely agree with you that we need to help these families in need... we shouldn't throw those kids and their mothers to the wolves, but the issue of responsiblity on the part of the parents must also be addressed equally. It is also a well known statistic that children raised in this fashion are more prone to repeat this cycle than escape it. So perhaps the comments you are seeing however cold and terrible are a reflection of the publics frustration with this side of the problem not being addressed. I don't honestly think we can ever completely get rid of poverty but I think we can create a better safety net AND foster more responsibility if we can get past the politics.

October 02 2010 at 12:46 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to cityguy60640's comment
rockywalter2327

Funny how the word 'father' was mentioned only once, and in reference to the sins of the mother. Few seem to hold the fathers of these children accountable.

October 04 2010 at 3:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
newsfan67

I see this as a growing problem with the Republican party. A FB friend recently posted that no one making minimum wage should have children (she stopped short of advocating sterilization, thankfully) Dealing with poverty and all that goes along is just too difficult and rather than find a remedy they have decided to find a scapegoat. I don't believe liberal policies are the answer, but at least they recognize there is a problem and it belongs to all of us. There are solutions. But we must remember, the poor will always be with us, and somehow that is the hardest part to swallow.

October 01 2010 at 10:34 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
alive1264

Conservatives who constantly accuse people of color of playing the "race card" (the Right's new favorite comeback for any subject addressing race relations in America) never seem to have much to say when faced with the blatant, loud, evil and ignorant bigotry and pure racism against people of color--black people in particular--that this article proves still exists in this country.

October 01 2010 at 8:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to alive1264's comment
dave

This article proves it? Why, because she said so? How about some facts. You can just as easily imply that the majority of comment posters are racists having no correlation to the general public.

October 01 2010 at 9:43 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
alive1264

@dave: You're really stretching there. The author is writing about comments posted at the Washington Post's website. Are you saying she made that up? Or are you one of those brilliant people who say that it's actually black people posting those racist comments to prove a point? Given those comments, what PROOF do you have that racism DOESN'T exist? Where do the people who wrote those comments come from if not among the general public--Mars?

October 01 2010 at 10:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
trb2244

Actually the "eugenics" idea came from the founder of Planned Parenthood, I believe, a woman who has been thoroughly discredited for that reason. What voters are upset about is that much of this "poverty" is government engendered and pretty much preventable: the single parent model usually (spare me the diatribe about Mothers Who Made a Difference-- I taught high school in an urban setting for 42 years and I could tell YOU some stories of heroism and sacrifice by single parents) doesn't work very well. It fosters a spiral of neglect and disrespect that ruins both the parent's life and the child's. All that government check does is let some seventeen year old think she can make it on her own. She can't.

October 01 2010 at 7:52 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
webbsightful

This rhetoric is so stale.This narrative about blacks and other minorities is so offensive. The reality is there are individuals of all races that "aren't doing their work." Nevertheless, we always have to bring up race. No whining here Bob. I wish you like-minded people such as you afforded me the luxury of hearing your rambling in person. I guarantee you would learn quite quickly your assumptions and stereotypical rhetoric would not be tolerated. I don't have the time or energy to fight a bunch of white people about racism in this country. It's clear it exists and people believe in it. I'm simply trying to navigate through the nonsense and network with people of all races that we can't be silent about this anymore while the rantings of bigotry spreads to more brain-washed people.

October 01 2010 at 3:54 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Follow Politics Daily


  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners