Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Plenty of Lawmakers Were Against the Stimulus Before They Were For It

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
The stimulus package designed to jump start the economy last year was a convenient target for members of both parties looking to take a stand against government spending.

But after bashing the stimulus, a surprising number of those lawmakers, Republican and Democratic alike, happily sought a share of the money for their home districts, according to a new investigation published Monday by The Washington Post and the Center for Public Integrity.

The Post points out Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) repeatedly railed against the stimulus, calling it a package of "trillion-dollar spending sprees" that were "more about stimulating the government and rewarding political allies than growing the economy and creating jobs." But then Sessions went back to his Dallas-area district and lobbied for some of the same government money for an $81-million transportation project.

His letter to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, obtained by the Center for Public Integrity, "suggested that the project would create jobs, undercutting his public arguments against the stimulus," according to the Post's report.

Sessions (pictured) defended the apparent gap between his words and actions.
"What I have not done is allow my strong, principled objection to the bill to prevent me from asking federal agencies for their full consideration of critical infrastructure and competitive grant projects for North Texas when asked to do so by my constituents," he told the newspaper.
Sessions was not alone, according to the Post:
Scores of Republicans and conservative Democrats who voted against the stimulus law subsequently wrote letters seeking funds. They include tea party favorites such as freshman Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), as well as Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), former presidential candidates.

Like their Republican counterparts, Democratic critics of the stimulus also sent letters seeking funding afterward. Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho), one of seven Democrats in the House to vote against the bill, has written letters to Commerce Secretary Gary Locke requesting funds for four broadband-related projects in his state.
Read the Post investigation on lawmakers who were against the stimulus before they were for it here.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

38 Comments

Filter by:
kcoldc

I just don't understand why those who represent us in the Senate and the House, who vehemently argue against something, and who lose their argument, are later chastised for then moving ahead and doing the best they can for their people. Yes, the Senator would prefer the Stimulus Bill to not have passed, but since it has, he as a responsibility to make the best gains he can for the American people and the people of his state. Finally, those writing these articles know this- why are they attempting to mislead us?

October 19 2010 at 5:38 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
rneigh9880

Do not allow articles like the one Mr. Weber has written cloud the issues. Once a spending bill has passed, its the job of the members of Congress to secure what they can for their area. Vote the politicans out that hatched this idea that we can borrow and spend our way of financial hard times. No right minded person that was in fiancial trouble would act the way these people have acted over the past ten years. Vote the idiots out on November 2. Put in some new people, it will take several years for them to learn how to steal.

October 19 2010 at 4:01 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tkobran

True, Republcians voted against the stimulus bill. However, since the bill was passed over their objections did you expect them to let only Democrat controlled states get the funding? How dumb is that! After all, it is our tax dollars, including mostly Republican tax dollars, being spent! Why shouldn't we get our share? As it turns out, Blue states (Democrats) got most of the funding!

October 19 2010 at 12:31 AM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
playrfire

I believe it was President Obama who said there were no shovel ready jobs in an interview with the NY Times.

October 18 2010 at 10:03 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to playrfire's comment
catalogsplus

You are correct, and after selling his 'stimulus' plan on ... yep, shovel ready projects that he now says they do not exist. No wonder they have not generated any jobs.

October 18 2010 at 10:49 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
nokabosh

The awful thing is that the public believed BO when he said that there were shovel ready projects. The MSM went along with it and didn't educate the people. It takes years to plan, do studies, etc., to build a road or bridge. Unless all that's been done and funding is all that holding it up it ain't going to be shovel ready. As it is, the Porkulus money is gone -- there's nothing there for new infrastucture. The States grabbed it for their budget shortfalls, unions, pensions, and to grow their gov'ts. Next year when the money runs out these State gov'ts are going to want to be fed again.

October 19 2010 at 1:30 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
cdave1ds

If I Steal I Go To Jail, If A Banker Steals The Goverment Will Give Him More Money !!!!

October 18 2010 at 8:33 PM Report abuse +5 rate up rate down Reply
tnickerson08

I guess the democrats were against the stimulus, before they were for it; now they just don't want to mention it. The democrats just want to renew the don't ask, don't tell policy when it comes to the stimulus. lol

October 18 2010 at 8:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to tnickerson08's comment
mwl1950

It is a shame that we did not elect John McCain, he would sure know how to put more Americans to work. After we bombed Iran and soon after invaded, just think of all the extra troops we would need. We could have used all of the knowledge learned and money spent fighting that other necessary war and rebuild another country while ours falls apart. I'm sure there was no waste and fraud in the Iraq war because it was started under a Repubican Administration! Right! Are we still looking for those weapons of mass destruction, they have got to be there because we know Republicans do not make any errors in judgement.

October 19 2010 at 9:38 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
cdave1ds

The Only Ones That Got Any money Was The Bankers.......

October 18 2010 at 8:32 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to cdave1ds's comment
Stan

The Banks paid their money bank with interest!!!!!! Not the case with Obama Motors!===Feb 20, 2010 ... General Motors CEO Ed Whitacre was granted annual compensation valued ... been set at $5.5 million, including a $1.3 million annual salary Obama/dems demonize the banks and want cap salaries of those who took TARP funds. But when it comes to those he is paying with taxpayer money WOW what a different tune!!!!! Then there is Citigroup another partially owned by the taxpayers=====The biggest raise disclosed in Citi's regulatory filing will go to John Havens, head of the bank's institutional clients group. He will get a cash salary of $500,000 this year, the maximum under the cap, and $9 million of salary paid in stock. That compares with a salary of $975,000 last year for Havens, also in a blend of cash and stock. Including other awards of stock and options last year, Havens' total compensation last year came to $11.2 million. Citibank did not disclose how much Havens might be awarded in other stock grants, but he could be eligible for a bonus this year of up to 50 percent of his salary, or $4.75 million. Manuel Medina-Mora, head of consumer banking for the Americas, will also get a cash salary of $500,000 and $7.45 million of salary in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $4 million. Last year, Medina-Mora's base salary was $972,000, and his total compensation including other awards of stock and options was $9.8 million. Chief Financial Officer John Gerspach's salary will be $500,000 in cash and $4.17 million in stock, making him eligible for a bonus of up to $2.3 million. Last year, his cash and stock salary was $3.3 million, and his total compensation including other stock awards was $5 million. Then there are Fannie And Freddie Who are still a drain and are not subject to the Obama Bank regulations (you know those that got TARP money and paid it back with interest! Part of its Christmas Eve announcement contained a provision enabling Fannie Mae CEO Michael Williams and Freddie Mac CEO Ed Haldeman to receive as much as $6 million in annual compensation - all in cash. Granted that's a good deal less than the lavish pay bestowed upon CEOs before the meltdown, especially Fannie Mae's James Johnson and (ethically-challenged) Franklin Raines. But it's worth mentioning that pay levels are exempt from Temporary Asset Relief Program limits that apply to banks taken over by the government. No federal "pay czar" need poke around here. No 500k limits on these gopher holes!!!!!!!

October 21 2010 at 5:07 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gunnnzz

I'll clue you in on something. There's approximately 240 million dollars worth of work that has to be done in Southern California alone. Guess what? It's all on hold

October 18 2010 at 8:26 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
gunnnzz

Can we please count the jobs the stimulus package has created? Come on!!

October 18 2010 at 8:21 PM Report abuse -5 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gunnnzz's comment
msgusarmyret77

The Aug report by the non-partisan CBO said the stimulus created between 1.4 million and 3.3 million jobs.

October 18 2010 at 9:34 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
tplapper

It's a shame that both Democrats AND Republicans talk out the side of their mouths. You can count on me voting Third Party, again.

October 18 2010 at 8:11 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply

FEATURED VIDEO

View All »

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video »

Follow Politics Daily


Politics Home Page : Roll Call