AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
"Jack, you should be ashamed of yourself," said the self-described "pro-life Christian," who may or may not have turned the other cheek, but who did refuse to shake Conway's hand after the debate. "Have you no decency? Have you no shame?"most christians deserve to have their heads removed and placed on a stick...which is unfortunate...
November 02 2010 at 9:00 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyRand Paul acted like a 2-year-old with his temper-tantrum, and then it got ugly. Hope his face doesn't freeze that way.
October 20 2010 at 10:33 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyI do live in Kentucky. At present, I'm not wanting to vote for either man. Dr. Paul is pro-life, which I'm always puzzled by, because so many pro-life Republicans trumpet about the sanctity of life when it is a fetus, but don't seem to give a fig about the children already born, so many of which in this country are on food stamps. They also don't have a problem with going over to other countries and blowing innocent brown children away by the hundreds of thousands. As for Mr. Conway, I contacted his campaign for a clarification of where he stood upon a certain issue which was not covered on his website, the 800-lb. elephant that no one seems to want to talk about-the fact that the folks calling for austerity in the national budget always target the entitlement programs and never discuss the huge amounts of money going to the MIC for two wars we simply can't afford any more, particularly when billions of the money we've given the Pentagon has simply vanished with no oversight, wasted on contractors and corruption. He hasn't gotten back to me yet. I also have no use for the Aqua Buddha ad-he could have used that money much more constructively and on something more to the point than a college prank. At this point, I'm going to see if there's a third party candidate on the ballot.
October 18 2010 at 7:55 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyLet me see if I understand this correctly. Mr. Rand's whole platform is based on keeping government out of our lives EXCEPT for a woman's right to choose what to do with their own bodies. How can he possibly justify that position. Apparently, he only wants to keep the government out of the lives of big business and screw the rest of us. What a jerk!!
October 18 2010 at 11:27 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyIf I was a Kentucky voter the choice would be easy for me. Do I vote for the guy that supports Obamacare of for the guy that was involved in a prank in college 30 years ago? Not a very difficult decision to make. Seems to me that if you have to go back to a candidate's college days to dig up dirt on him you lost the election already.
October 18 2010 at 7:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyWell, I'm not from Kentucky, but if I were I'd be looking for someone other than Paul or Conway to vote for. Rand Paul is far too extreme right for me; and Jack Conway obviously doesn't think he can win based on his position on the issues that matter to the people of Kentucky.
October 18 2010 at 7:08 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyAccording the the local talk shows today....Conway stepped all over himself...and what did he "mouth" as Paul was walking away...someone will be able to tell and I bet it isn't good....give it a day or 2.....there are expert lip readers on it......
October 18 2010 at 6:24 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyRand Paul is self-righteous and cannot hold his own with Jack Conway who is the better man.
October 18 2010 at 6:08 PM Report abuse Permalink -6 rate up rate down Reply@cclawnj What does that mean? That, "Bush was conservative about some things, quite liberal on others. He encouraged Congress to spend money like there was no tomorrow and ran up massive deficits" Being liberal about spending means that he spent money on liberal programs. What social programs did he create? What civil liberty policies did he extend? Oh you must mean Medicare part D where he increased the drugs that folks could get on medicare. Or were you talking about... Well there wasn't anything. Oh yeah there was the banking deregulation that he did but other than that there wasn't much in domestic polices that he did. I also find it interesting that no one said anything about Bush's spending til the new sheriff was being elected. Funny...
October 18 2010 at 4:20 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyPaul very successfully highlighted the slicksters who will do and say just about anything get elected. Amerrica is so very over the negative campaigning, and yet politicians just are not getting it. Maybe the results in November will help them to get it. I doubt it, but just maybe.
October 18 2010 at 3:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyTruwriter1:43 PM Oct 18, 2010(1) vote this comment up (2) vote this comment down On the other hand, shouldn't we remember that it still is OK to be a Christian. Is it really open season on Catholics and Christians in America?--------------Christiand NOT Catholics have been singled out .. The Pope over looking and hiding molesters has been of Focus.. The Christianls are well reperesented and praised on here ofter.. Christianity has NEVER been under attack from what I have read and i have read a huge amount on here
October 18 2010 at 1:54 PM Report abuse Permalink -5 rate up rate down ReplyDiscover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.
View the Video »Follow Politics Daily
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
69 Comments