AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Delaware's Democratic slate is like a company of traveling actors, appearing together repeatedly in their tiny state. The Truman-Kennedy dinner and auction at a firehouse here drew Coons, as well as Gov. Jack Markell, Sen. Tom Carper, outgoing Sen. Ted Kaufman, Attorney General Beau Biden and House candidate John Carney.At the time the consitution was writen there was the church of england as Iran is a islamic state. The idea was not the seperation of church and state. The idea was there would be no church of this country. That people have the right to believe in what ever religion they choose. O'ddonnell is right. Is does not say there is a seperation of church and state it was design to limit government whe it came to a person freedom.
October 27 2010 at 11:17 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyI really wish you had shown a clip of Chris Coons doing his auctioneer schtick. I've heard he's really good. He volunteers his time doing this at a lot of auctions, for schools and such. As far as the comment on Christine O'Donnell's signs being stolen, that works both ways. I drive from Newark to Wilmington to work daily and Coons' signs are disappearing, being replaced by O'Donnell's. Her people are doing the same thing. It happens in every election. I just hope she gets her signs down FAST after she loses next Tuesday. There's a law in Delaware that says that candidates have to remove their signs in a certain amount of time, and I, for one, do consider her signs litter.
October 27 2010 at 9:31 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyI don't know in which part of Sussex Co., Delaware Miss Jill Lawrence drives every day for the past year, but her assertion that Christine's signs "line the highways in southern Delaware, her stronghold, while Coons signs are small and rare" is utter nonsense. Christine's signs are routinely stolen and signs for Democrat candidates spring up in their place immediately. (Witness statements, including license numbers, have been received by the Del. State Police on this issue.) There can be no doubt about her left-wing bona fides, but, as if to make sure that we all understand "where she's comin' from," she goes on to describe cap-and-trade as a "series of small measures to expand renewable energy, increase energy efficiency and tighten regulations on emissions." Yeah, right. This is roughly analagous to calling the Holocaust the mere expression of an age-old Germanic longing for meaningful social change. Few Americans are naive enough to expect objectivity from any American "journalist" today, and Jill Lawrence doesn't disappoint.
October 27 2010 at 12:47 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyI have seen signs supporting candidates of both parties being removed from private property, specifically the frontage of commercial property (CVS, etc.), along Highway 1 in Rehobeth (Sussex County). Imagine the gall of these people asserting their first amendment rights to not have their personal property used for political endorsements.
October 27 2010 at 12:14 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyActually, the "series of small measures" was the way Coons thinks policy will proceed since cap-and-trade failed. It is not a definition of cap-and-trade.
November 30 2010 at 8:58 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyI am glad I do not live in Delaware. They are faced with a tough decision. Elect Christine to stop this out of control agenda and put balance back in government. Or elect Chris C. who will fall in step with Obama. Not to mention their is something about the man I do not trust. He comes across as a snake oil salesman.
October 26 2010 at 8:54 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyYou are so right. Of course anyone with a brain knows that for the last 200 years the first amendment's verbage has been interpeted by all members of the judiciary, legislative and executive branches to be read as a separation of church and state. Anyone who knows the history and context of the debates which caused it to be enacted knows that it was meant to enforce a separation of church and state. But you are so right, as is Christine, no where does it specifically state that there must be a separation of church and state. Boy, she really nailed that one.
October 26 2010 at 8:26 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyYou are correct. If most people would pay attention to the exact words of the question. The answer she gave was on the money. Too many people are reading into the question and her answer. What did they teach you in school read nothing into a question.
October 26 2010 at 8:50 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyJill, There is nothing in the first amendment that states: "Separation of church and state" The first amendment states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;" So in spite of Mr. Coons and the media making fun of O'Donnell for her ignorance of the first amendment, should look in the mirror. Her answer to a loaded question by CNN asking what SCOTUS decision did she disagree, should have cited the Selo decision that was the beginning of the destruction of the right to private private property, by destroying the eminent domain rules applied to government to confiscate private property from one to the benefit of another.
October 26 2010 at 1:17 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyChris Coons has let his ego run away with him. It's too bad he has the wholehearted support of the media. He is a liberal who will vote lock, stock and barrel with the dems and that is dangerous. I'd much rather see O'Donnell pull this off just to be rid of one more democrat. She can't do damage, as she will go along with her party and perhaps learn to be a leader. It's too bad she's been treated so badly by the media.
October 26 2010 at 10:41 AM Report abuse Permalink +16 rate up rate down ReplyCome on. Give the man a little credit for having his own brain. He knows that if he votes for something that is against the interest of Delaware, he won't be re-elected. If O'Donnell and the other Pee Party people get in office, your rights will go right out the door because while they speculate whether Coons would vote with the Democrats, they KNOW that they will vote lock step with the Republicans. We all know from high school civics classes that Democrats are for social programs and to help the people, while republicans help big business. Do you REALLY want to have the deregulation of Wall Street that contributed to the bad economy under Bush, and the ignoring of regulations that ended up with one of the worst ecological and economic disasters in the Gulf area? Do you really want someone LOWERING taxes while we try to figure out how to pay for the billions-a-day war debt Bush raised going after the man who threatened his daddy? President Obama is still trying to clear up the deficit that was left him when Bush ignored the people of this country and went into Iraq, even ignoring Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden - it might take years to recover from unrestrained arms spending, not to mention the human toll (lives lost and lives ruined - even though the man never had a plan in mind for the wounded - he never gave extra money to the VA). We need someone who IS a leader, not someone who MAY LEARN to be one.
October 26 2010 at 6:50 PM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down ReplyTexas & New York are both dropping deportation cases against ILLEGALS!! So what the government is saying is BREAK OUR LAWS AND WE'LL REWARD YOU!!! And now a new train system in CA where all ILLEGALS will be given jobs? Time to vote everyone of these idiots in washington out$$$
October 26 2010 at 10:00 AM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyIf I lived in Delaware I would vote for O'Donnel as she is truthful and thats exactly what awe need in Washington these days.....NY and going "Broke" with Taxes....
October 26 2010 at 9:58 AM Report abuse Permalink +15 rate up rate down ReplyIf you lived in Delaware, you'd see her for what she really is: an unemployed deadbeat who tries to avoid paying her taxes until they catch her and she says "It's an honest mistake". She's run for Senate 3 times - and she wouldn't be running this time if it hadn't been for Sarah Palin coming in to stump for her. She's said just about anything and everything to get into office - including running as a write in when she failed to get the nomination on a past election for senate which cost the republicans a seat because of her inability to understand what a partyline was. However, if she gets to Washington, she will be beholden to Palin and Rove, who are her handlers and will tell her everything she is to do - and if she even tries to do anything they don't approve of, they will cut her off.
October 26 2010 at 6:54 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyTruthful, really? So you believe she went to Oxford? Really? Funny they have no record. She said she went to Princeton. Really? They have no record. She said she went to Clearmont. Really? They have no record. From the resume she has constructed it sounds like she wants to be an Elitist.
October 26 2010 at 8:38 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyA girl in high school, goes with a guy for three weeks. He and she look into a group and witchcraft. The relationship ends and they go their separate ways and today she is branded a witch. I hope they never look into my life.
October 26 2010 at 9:31 AM Report abuse Permalink +17 rate up rate down ReplyTed.. I disagree other countries and many Americans look at this as a equal opportunity. Our constitution lists the qualifications for a senator. Their is nothing listed that politicians have to have a law degree. That is the standard that the people have been led to believe by politicians.Perfect example when have they ever passed a law that would place caps on any type of law suit. How would you get a lawyer to daft a law that would restrict the practice of another lawyer. Our whole way of life in the last twenty years is based on filing law suits where the lawyers walk away rich with little or no effort. Open your phone book to the lawyer section and read all the full page ads for lawyer looking for injury cases. We need to chase all the lawyers out of politics. Government is nothing more then a large corporation not a court house. Corporations are run by business people and people with common sense and sound business judgment.
October 26 2010 at 3:54 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down ReplyCutie: She was the one who brought it up. If she hadn't said anything about it back in the day, we wouldn't know. We didn't brand her - she did that herself. But then I know her. I wouldn't call her a witch. But I'd call her something close.
October 26 2010 at 6:56 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyDiscover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.
View the Video »Follow Politics Daily
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
26 Comments