AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
That was baseball's loss, not to mention Al Gore's, for however one comes down on important policy questions such as the war in Iraq, education reform, gay marriage, tax cuts, or the Medicare drug benefit signed into law by the 43rd president, one thing is clear as Bush's boyhood team squares off against his adopted team in the fall classic: He was on the mark when it came to the pernicious influence of steroids in sports.Athletics play such an important role in our society, but, unfortunately, some in professional sports are not setting much of an example. The use of performance-enhancing drugs like steroids in baseball, football, and other sports is dangerous, and it sends the wrong message -- that there are shortcuts to accomplishment, and that performance is more important than character. So tonight I call on team owners, union representatives, coaches, and players to take the lead, to send the right signal, to get tough, and to get rid of steroids now.
I suspect that, before all is said and done, we'll find out President G. W. Bush was correct about a number of things. By the way, Dems, is the War over yet?
October 28 2010 at 9:40 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyThank you Mr. Cannon for addressing a serious topic and for having the courage to admit that President Bush got something right. I don't even mind the gratuitous dig at some of presidential actions because he probably would have been just as happy to be baseball commissioner as president
October 28 2010 at 3:42 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyIn defense of the steroid users in baseball, since baseball did not outlaw thier use, the players did nothing illegal. It's just like when they outlawed the spit ball for pitchers, up to then it was legal and all records stood. In defense of the long ball hitters, size always helps but having a good eye for the ball is what gives you that perfect contact and other than maybe eye wear, which will always be legal, is a natural gift. There can be no doubt Babe Ruth had this gift and thier no telling how he would have performed if he would have layed off alcohol. I once heard a remark of one of his team mates that he showed up so intoxicated that he had to lean on the bat on deck to keep on his feet but on that day he went 2 for 4, one hit was a homer. All I can is God, I love the game!
October 28 2010 at 3:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplySteroids became illegal to use without Doctor approval in the U.S. in 1990. So they were still breaking the law after that point, even if it wasn't illegal in Baseball.
October 28 2010 at 3:32 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyBaseball has a testing policy designed to NOT catch the cheaters. In order to test for Human Growth Hormone, a blood test is necessary. The players union won't allow blood tests, only urine tests. One would have to be naive to think that nearly everone is using H.G.H. If baseball was serious about preventing performance enhancing drugs, they would do what pro cycling does and track & field. Numerous in season and out of season tests, with no warning. Miss a test, you are gone for two years. Come up positive, two year suspension. Yes, those other sports have a lot of people caught, including their super stars, but that is because the tests are designed to catch them. Two years ago at the Tour de France they gave out over 500 drug tests. Lance Armstrong was tested 17 times during the tour. Baseball (not to mention the other pro sports in America) has more drug users than it doesn't.
October 28 2010 at 3:07 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down Reply"W" is a Good God Fearing Man - and history will prove he was a GREAT President.
October 28 2010 at 2:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +9 rate up rate down ReplyBush was still a co-owner of a team that had more than a couple steroid users. Canseco, and Palmeiro, are on record as being so, and who knows how many more there were. Bush, like most of the owners of the time simply didn't care, or want to know. They were just happy to see how much money was coming in. And to be honest, as a fan, it was fun to watch. So if Bush helped in cleaning up baseball, it should also be added that he was in a position to do something when steroid use ramped up, and didn't.
October 28 2010 at 1:25 PM Report abuse Permalink -5 rate up rate down ReplyYou all need to watch the documentary, "Bigger, Stronger, Faster." Get an education about steroids.
October 28 2010 at 1:12 PM Report abuse Permalink +4 rate up rate down ReplyAt least the man as president didn't degrade the office by going on the tonight show or comedy central or blame Clinton for every mistake that he made.
October 28 2010 at 1:07 PM Report abuse Permalink +18 rate up rate down ReplyThe sad part of having to police a game in banding serniods is that the band trickle down to all people. Most of these serniods where created to help people with medical problems like cancer, aids, auto immune patients. Now that the cruse is on legetiment serniods too, many Doctors are afraid to write a scrip for any one and many have suffered from the pride and corruption in baseball. The Bush band may have help a sick baseball indrustry, but has harmed many in need of their medicine. Sad, Very Sad
October 28 2010 at 12:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyFirst of all, The Democrats took control of Congress in January 2007. Congress enacts Legislation and approves the Budget. There are Three Branches of Government. Congress is called the Legislative Branch.The Office of the President is the Executive Branch. They dont Legislate or approve the Busget etc. This Branch enforces thr rules of Congress. Anyhting that Bush got or didnt get during the last two years of his Presidency was courtesy of the Democrats including the TARP Bill.The turning point for this recession was 1999 when that Administration allowed people that could afford homes to buy them with no money down. Part of the package was that Fannie and Freddie guaranteed the Loans so the Bankers approved them. When the Democrats took control of Congress inn January 2007 they increased this percentage and the Baners approved even more bad Loans, Do a Serch on the Community Reinvestment act and look at the cause and turning point and who revived it in 1999 if you dont know who was President.The probrelm now is there are no checks and balances. More democrats were elected in 2008 and now have a super majority and Obam, Pelosi and Reid rubber stamp each other in Social Engineering etc.
October 28 2010 at 12:39 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyWhen the democrats controlled congress during president Bush's last two years, the president vetoed any bill he did not like and signed the bills that he did. He has to take responsibility for what he signed.
October 28 2010 at 1:18 PM Report abuse Permalink +6 rate up rate down Replydepotofam, most excellent.....someone who knows what a veto is, most peeps on here never heard of one.......you could'nt be more right, anything passed that hurt this country passed with his signature on it......
October 28 2010 at 3:04 PM Report abuse Permalink +3 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners







Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
22 Comments