Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Democrats Barely Hold Onto Majority in Senate

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
(Nov. 2) -- In what was one of the few bright spots in an otherwise dark election day for Democrats, the party will keep control of the Senate, but with a slim margin and several tea party Republicans coming to Washington, leaving little hope for bipartisanship in the 112th Congress.

Republicans were unable to pick up the 10 seats they needed the wrest the Senate majority away from Democrats. But GOP wins in Kentucky, Florida and Arkansas mean Democrats will have a smaller majority to work with in a now-divided Capitol Hill.

An early come-from-behind victory for Democrats in West Virginia made the math more daunting for Republicans but the GOP was buoyed by a narrow win in Pennsylvania and a victory in Illinois, where they snatched President Obama's old Senate seat.
Republicans were unable to take out their biggest target of the night, Majority Leader Harry Reid. The Nevada senator defied the pundits by defeating tea party favorite Sharron Angle in the political fight of his life.

Early in the evening, the GOP picked up open Democratic seats in Indiana and North Dakota, held on to several red seats in the Midwest and South and booted Democratic incumbents in Arkansas and Wisconsin.
Democrats went into the evening with a 59-41 majority that included two independents who caucus with them. With 37 seats in play, the best Republicans can hope for is a 50-50 tie that Vice President Biden, the Senate's official president, would break in Democrats' favor.

A look at the most competitive Senate races, starting in the east and heading west by poll closing times:

Kentucky: The tea party notched its first victory here as Republican Rand Paul beat Democratic Attorney General Jack Conway in what would be several wins for the out-of-nowhere small government movement.

Florida: Republican Marco Rubio provided the second tea party victory of the evening. Rubio, who trounced Gov. Charlie Crist in the GOP primary, easily defeated him again as the independent split the anti-tea party vote with Democratic Rep. Kendrick Meek.

Delaware: Republican Christine O'Donnell won the publicity battle with Democrat Chris Coons but he dashed her hopes of joining the burgeoning Senate tea party caucus. The New Castle County executive will take Vice President Joe Biden's old Senate seat while O'Donnell and her "I am not a witch" ad will live on YouTube.

West Virginia: Gov. Joe Manchin beat Republican businessman John Raese to hold the seat of the late Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd. The race was expected to be a squeaker in a state that rejected Barack Obama in 2008.

Connecticut: Democratic Attorney General Richard Blumenthal tossed wrestling mogul Linda McMahon out of the ring to keep the seat of retiring Sen. Chris Dodd.

Arkansas: Three-term senator Blanche Lincoln was the first Democrat to fall victim to anti-incumbent fever among voters, losing her seat to Republican Rep. John Boozman.

Wisconsin: Another 18-year Democratic veteran, Russ Feingold, lost his re-election bid against Republican tea party candidate Ron Johnson. The co-architect of the campaign finance reform law whose gutting by the Supreme Court helped set records for corporate spending in this election, had been a brick in the Democratic "firewall strategy" of so-called safe seats needed to block a Republican takeover.

Illinois: Republicans can crow about taking the president's old Senate seat as Rep. Mark Kirk edged past Democratic state treasurer Alexi Giannoulias.

Pennsylvania: Congressman Joe Sestak bucked his party to run against Republican-turned-Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter in the primary but couldn't close the deal against Republican Pat Toomey, who emerged victorious by a thin margin.

California: Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer defeated former Hewlett-Packard executive Carly Fiorina and her multimillion campaign to win a fourth term.

Colorado: In the race for the seat that once belonged to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, his appointed successor, Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet was struggling to fend off tea party favorite Ken Buck in one of the closest races of the night.

Washington: With more than half the precincts reporting, Democratic incumbent Patty Murray held a slight edge over Republican Dino.

Alaska: It could be weeks until the results are known in the anything-goes three-way battle in Alaska. Sen. Lisa Murkowski's write-in votes will take days to tally and, if she ends up in the lead, are certain to face legal challenges from the man who bested her in the Republican primary, tea party favorite Joe Miller. As a result, a second-place finish may be all Democrat Scott McAdams -- once written off as irrelevant -- needs to become the next senator from Last Frontier.

Gridlock Only Certain Outcome


With far from the super-majority of 60 seats needed to prevent filibusters, Democrats will be forced to reach across the aisle if they want to get anything done. But after one of the ugliest campaigns in memory, bipartisanship may be in short supply.

"If Sen. McConnell's vow to dedicate the Republican efforts in the 112th Congress to ensuring that President Obama will not be re-elected and the Democrats stand fast in the ranks to ensure that the laws enacted in the last Congress are not repealed, it will be a bloody slugfest the likes of which we have not seen since the Clinton impeachment," said Ross Baker, a Rutgers University congressional expert.

"No one is really going to run the Senate," said University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato. "The chances for significant legislation are slim. The two caucuses have rarely been as far apart in modern times."

With moderate Democrats like Lincoln and retiring Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh -- who will be replaced by former GOP senator Dan Coats -- gone, the Democratic caucus moved left while new tea party senators moved the GOP right.

"I think we can reasonably expect a lot of posturing and not much else, unless President Obama can find a few less ideological topics for bipartisan agreement," Sabato said.

Andrew Kohut of the Pew Research Center said now that the voting is over, the public will expect lawmakers to make good on their campaign promises. "Mixed control of the Congress will mean the blame will be shared if it doesn't occur," he said.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Comments

176 Comments

Filter by:
Comments are no longer accepted for this topic.
ray13666

Now that the Conservatives are in control of the house, which I am glad of, but the problem is not solved. What we need now is performance by the new leaders. Govt. size must be reduced, spending absolutely has to be cut in half or more. Politicians need to learn to work within a fixed budget like us taxpayers. Most of the pork-belly laden health care bill needs to be eliminated, especially those items thrown in there which have nothing at all to do with health care. New bills purposed have to be about the bill itself, not added with lots of other items that are meaningless and have nothing to do with the bill itself. The illegal agenda of oboma has to be addressed and laws passed to get rid of illegals once and for all, and also to punish those that hire them. The lies, cheating and stealing must be stopped. It is now up to all of us to hold their feet to the fire and make sure the newly elected politicians never forget who they work for!

November 03 2010 at 10:20 AM
penguin0315

Listen folks, I don't care what your party affiliation is, we've voted, it's done. Support those in office, and be heard! Don't like what your representative is pushing, WRITE TO THEM, there's this invention called email, use it. They all have it too! We can't all go to play ball and expect to be the one hitting the home run, we need someone to pitch, someone to play short stop, someone to catch... If this government can't work as a team, we're doomed for another 10 years... We have got to STOP with the Reps V Dem mentality. We're all there for a united purpose, to make things BETTER than they are now for the Average American citizen. So lets work on fixing the problems instead of just being nay sayers.

November 03 2010 at 10:18 AM
Paul

Is Shuler going to make good on his pledge to challenge Reid for Majority Leader?

November 03 2010 at 10:14 AM
Paul

The three branches of govt are the legislative (both houses of Congress), judicial (Supreme Court) and executive (President). Where did you take Civics?

November 03 2010 at 10:11 AM
necamw

Sorry to see Feingold go - I didn't always agree with him, but I felt he was a principled man, and he (or his staff) was always quick to respond the few times I contacted his office. Best of luck to Johnson - hope he does right by Wisconsin.

November 03 2010 at 10:06 AM
cruml51

Politics is funny, sometimes it is better to lose and force others to do some work. Especially the mid terms. Every campaign promise made in order to get elected has been recorded, and if no efftort is made to keep them, voters will be reminded. Obama still has the veto pen, and the numbers suggest it will be difficult to override a veto, unless the public is wildly for the legislation. Bi-partisanship here we come. The money behind some of these campaigns will be looking for payback, not more requests for campaign help.

November 03 2010 at 10:06 AM
Hello Eileen

The question is, why should the republicans be bipartisan. Obama, Reid, and Pelosi were the most partisan politicians I can remember and I am 67 years old. Obama and the other two did everything they could to ram bills through Congress in a very thugery way. I recommend the Republicans tell the three dem leaders that they will be bipartisan only for those things they want and not what Obama wants. The goal is gridlock towards Obama's radical left agenda.

November 03 2010 at 10:05 AM
jpflrf

VOTERS IV WV ARE JUST LIKE THE MOUNTAINEER FOOTBALL TEAM. THEY HAD A CHANCE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE BUT, "THEY DROPPED THE BALL".

November 03 2010 at 10:02 AM
Paul

Obama unfortunately is no Clinton in the sense of that president's political roots, political experience and common sense. When Clinton tried the same Leftist rulership in his first two years, he was visibly spanked in '94 and was chastened. Dick morris came to him and showed him the way to get a win-win with the Republicans. Clinton was re-elected and actually enjoyed the benefits of a Republican congress which kept his Left flank occupied. The country prospered with the dot.com explosion until the internet bubble burst at the end of Clinton's 2nd term, something Democrats conveniently ignore. Bush was left to clean up that mess and deal with 9-11, all within 1 year. The stock market during his tenure rose to a high of nearly 14500 on the DOW and unemployment averaged about 4.4%. Then the housing crisis, looming for many years and predictable as the Sunrise, created a domino effect in the financial world. It had been created by lax regulation (derivatives) started in the Clinton era and blindly maintained in the Bush era through laissez-faire government philosophy approach along with zero Congressional oversight involving outright denial of any problems, especially in the last 2 years (see Frank & Dodd). This financial mess will have long lasting consequences much as the great Depression and will likely take years to resolve. Since Obama is like every other Liberal Democrat now in the sense that he forgets or refuses to recognize that which doesn't fit into his political ideology and which would hinder his lust for power, he will not do what Clinton did in the 90s. Just watch the pre-election tape of his speeches and rallies to see what he really thinks. With this man in the WH there is only one job which needs our attention and that is defeating him in 2012 at all costs. When Democrats took Congress in '06 and further cemented their numbers to overwhelming majorities in '08, all hope of bi-partisanship went out the window. He told Republicans "Elections have consequences...I won." So much for bi-partisanship. he is now reaping what he himself has sown. In the process he has caused both the House and Senate to veer more to the extremes and has effectively killed the Center. I'm sure he's very happy with himself right about now. Ayres must be smiling.

November 03 2010 at 10:01 AM +3
Pamela

You are not a journalist. It is clear that you are very biased in favor of big-government politicians and government expansion with no limits. You demean anyone who is not for big government policies.

November 03 2010 at 10:01 AM +1

FEATURED VIDEO

View All »

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video »

Follow Politics Daily


Politics Home Page : Roll Call