Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Hispanics Win 3 Key Races for GOP and Lend Clout to Both Parties

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
In a historic election that will probably change how both political parties regard and court the Latino vote, for the first time ever Hispanic candidates, all Republican, won top statewide offices in predominantly blue states.
That is not, however, the only good news for Hispanics or the only measure of growing Hispanic power. Latinos made their mark as well on the Democratic side.

Latino Democrats are now getting at least some credit for the surprising victories of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in Nevada against tea-party upstart Sharron Angle in what was one of the most contentious and close races in the nation. Latinos accounted for 14 percent of the vote in Nevada, and based on exit polls, two-thirds of Latinos voted for Reid. Latinos are also credited for the last-minute surge of Michael Bennet, the incumbent Democrat candidate for the U.S. Senate in Colorado, where Latinos make up 13 percent of all voters. Bennet, whose election to a full term was in doubt during much of the campaign, claimed victory on Wednesday afternoon. His opponent, Ken Buck, a Republican district attorney with tea-party support, has conceded.
But the greater measure of expanding and shifting Latino voting power – a measure that might give Democrats some alarm – was the GOP's ability to field three top-tier Hispanic candidates for major office while the Democrats fielded nobody. The Republicans also fielded Latinos to run for U.S. House seats and at least three won against entrenched Democrats in Texas, Idaho and Washington state.
All three candidates for major statewide offices won big victories in New Mexico, Nevada and Florida with platforms highlighting hot-button issues like jobs, the economy, taxes, the deficit and immigration. They ran ahead despite their support for tougher anti-illegal immigration measures like the Arizona law that is opposed by many Latinos.
In New Mexico, Susana Martinez, a Republican 50-year-old county district attorney, became the first female Hispanic governor anywhere in this country. She drew support among Hispanics, who usually vote Democratic, and independents. During the campaign, she favored lower taxes, less spending, tighter border security, and like most tea-party-backed candidates, she is pro-life and anti-gay marriage. Hispanics make up 38 percent of all eligible voters in New Mexico; she was expected to get 30 percent of that vote, which is high for a Republican in New Mexico. Overall she won 53.6 percent over 46.4 percent for her Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. Diane Denish.
In Nevada, voters elected a Latino governor for the first time, Brian Sandoval, a 47-year-old Republican who is a former federal judge, and who may have alienated some Latino votes when he said publicly that his children "didn't look Hispanic." But while Latinos seemed to have helped rescue Harry Reid from defeat, at least a good number of Latinos supported Sandoval over his opponent, Harry Reid's son, Rory Reid, a Democrat, who won 53.4 percent to 44.6 percent.
Though Martinez and Sandoval made history by becoming the first Latina and Latino governors of their states, the star of the 2010 Latino Republican class is, without doubt, Marco Rubio, the 39-year-old son of Cuban exiles who is now the U.S. senator-elect of Florida.
Already tagged as "the great right hope" and "the Cuban Barack Obama," Rubio skyrocketed from the semi-obscurity of Florida state politics to defeat the current governor, Charlie Crist, for the GOP nomination to the U.S. Senate seat. Crist became an independent and ran for the seat along with the Democrat Kendrick Meek. Rubio beat them both by a wide margin – Rubio at 49 percent, Crist at 30 percent, Meeks at 20 percent.
Rubio, a tea-party darling with a charismatic personality and youthful good looks, has set out his own path, mixing pragmatism with hard-right conservative principles, but he doesn't come off like an ideologue like, say, Rand Paul, the newly elected senator from Kentucky. Such is Rubio's appeal that the GOP establishment leaped to embrace him. He was endorsed by past or future presidential candidates including Mitt Romney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, and Sarah Palin.
At his victory party, at the historic Biltmore Hotel in affluent Coral Gables, Fla., Rubio projected a self-assured and commanding presence with a somber message of homegrown, flag-waving American values and his hope and promise that he would not go to Washington and become like everyone else there.
There are some contradictions perhaps between his personal background and his politics. He supports tough anti-illegal immigration measures, though his parents are first-generation Cuban exiles who struggled to rise to the Florida middle class. Though he is bilingual, he supports making English the official language of the United States, an issue that at one time riled Cuban immigrants as discriminatory.
Those contradictions, or incongruities, between the personal and the political may be exactly what makes him a successful Latino Republican candidate. He appeals to the growing Latino middle- and upper-classes in states like Florida and Texas who oppose illegal immigration (because the negative image of illegal immigrants affects the image of all Latinos) and who believe in assimilation in the American mainstream.
Rubio embodies most of all that. His vision and passion, coupled with an attractive stage persona and political savvy, make him, inevitably, a rising supernova in the GOP firmament. Hours after his election, there was already speculation about a Rubio vice presidential candidacy in 2010. He dismissed it all with a tight smile.
"It's flattering and it's fleeting," he said on cable news interviews. "Politics is full of one-hit wonders, of people that stood in a room like this with a bunch of cameras, and no one hears from them anymore."

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum Comment Moderation Enabled. Your comment will appear after it is cleared by an editor.

34 Comments

Filter by:
Ruth

I recently read an email sent out to subscribers from the National Council of La Raza It talked a bit about the election and completely absent from the discussion in the email was the fact the Latinos won major elections in some states. Susana Martinez is elected as the first Latina Gov and there's no mention? After reading the email I could only conclude that because these candidates were Republicans, NCLR chose not celebrate their wins. That is quite disturbing to me. It's quite obvious that NCLR prefers the Democratic agenda, but to blackout these wins and assume that all of your followers will support all of YOUR candidates should be insulting to those who vote and are free to make their own choices.

November 07 2010 at 11:14 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
dallasjcvs

Torregosa should be complimented on writing the article that the rest of the media has been completly ignoring. Namely, that GOP Hspanic candidates won at the state and federal level this election cycle. It would be foolish, however, to buy into the premise that Hspanic voters were making these selections solely based on political philosphy. "Nationalistic/Cultural" pride often dictates these choices.

November 06 2010 at 2:37 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
ossurworld

I am puzzled by the writer's interchangeable use of the terms "Latino" and "Hispanic." Is there a difference? Though the writer refers to most Republicans as "Hispanic," and most Democrats seem "Latino," she later reverses the terms, but seemingly based on their opinions of issues. I always thought the terms referred to specific geographic areas of a person's origins. Perhaps this now needs to be clarified. Many people have objected to the word "Hispanic," which was the source of an often-used epithet for people of a certain heritage.

November 06 2010 at 9:11 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
engineherder

My union takes my money and supports policies that most of my fellow employees are not in agreement with. They asked us to go to Tea Party rallies and pretend to be crazy tea party supporters. I saw one of those crazy misbehaving people get into a car with a Union sticker. Unfortunately, the one I belong to. We were supposed to act like racists and Neo Nazi's. The Democrats act like they are holier than thou, but create regulations that hobble our industry and then give drilling rights to foreign corporation in our waters and then try to overtax ours. Our manufacturing goes to foreign countries with no care for the environment, do you really think that the poisons stay in China, India and Mexico? We need reasonable regulations, developed by careful study, not environmentalists and bureaucrats. We need reasonable taxes on American corporations and individuals. Excessive Taxes on corportations come straight out of the pockets of consumers. That means that the American people are still paying those taxes, just second hand. Why are all of the financial centers moved outside of the country? Is our personal information safe in the hands of foreign countries, which might become our enemy tomorrow? God Bless America, and to all of you Veterans, in time zones that have already gone to 11/06, Thank you for your service.

November 06 2010 at 2:25 AM Report abuse +11 rate up rate down Reply
engineherder

The Democrats started supporting abortion thinking that most abortions would be of black children. They think all minorities are unable to think or suceed on their own. As a minority woman, I find this both untrue and insulting. I am a union member, and since I believe that I can suceed by my own effort, my union bosses dislike me. If you work hard and believe in yourself and take every opportunity that you are offered, you can succeed. I know of families that managed to buy homes and pay for them with two parents working 3 or more minimum wage jobs and the kids went to college. Sometimes you have to move. Sometimes you have to make your own opportunities. One of my daughters friends came here speaking no english in sixth grade. Her sister was 2 years older. Two years later, they are at the top of their classes. Both spoke English with almost no accent. Both of them worked in their parent's store. They went to school, took piano lessons, helped mamma and pappa at the store, did homework until midnight and were up at 0600 finishing. They graduated Valedictorians in their 'failing' school. They had very high Sat Scores and both recieved full scholarships that were based on acheivement, not race. They both have graduated form universities with honors and one is a doctor, the other a science professor. Because they worked hard and wanted to be Americans. This inspite of jeers by both adults and peers for being too white. What does not black enough or not latino enough mean? I have recieved more predjudice from liberals and persons of my own race than I have from any conservative. I am proud of Mr. Rubio, and hope he sticks to his conservative principals. If he proves, after at least 8 years of service that he is fit and qualified to be President, I will vote for him. I do not like either of them, but Sarah Palin and Hilary Clinton were more qualified than Barrack Obama. I would vote for Thomas Sowell if he were to run for President. We need secure borders, we need to make prisoners and welfare recipients pick fruit and we need to make a better way for Immigrants to come here legally. We also need to bring back the voting booth in all states and require id. In my state, a republican has a pink inner envelope on his mail ballot and a democrat has a blue one. The 'privacy envelope has numerous holes in it making it possible to see what party the voter belongs too. What is to keep an unscrupulous poll worker from either party from throwing out the ballots from people he doesn't agree with?

November 05 2010 at 11:51 PM Report abuse +17 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to engineherder's comment
lesley

You go girl, you speak for all Americans of the old school. Judge not and work hard and look for opportunities when they show up. I fear alot of opportunity has been lost, and give aways supplanted to give a false sense of security to generations of spoiled brats. We have a computer data base, so corrupt, in our State that your colored ballots only add to the total disfunction of our laws and voting intent. I sometimes think they should just have everyone who votes put a fingerprint down on the ballot, like the old make your mark history. Then run every ballot fingerprint through a national fingerprint computer, and verify citizenship, felony record and one person, one vote, all at the same time. Everyone who cared could go down the next day, and check to see on a computer if their fingerprint was run, or thrown away etc. Really, big brother is here with the banks and insurance companies, why not use technology to insure we maintain our little individual vote accuracy? Sounds like a plan.

November 06 2010 at 2:10 AM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
pudgeuncle

This author's theories are convoluted and do not take many factors into account. As a Floridian, I live in a state where all three Senate candidates were utterly disgraceful choices and Rubio's youth and looks made him more appealing than the others. I didn't vote for him and I am Hispanic. As for the other races, the author oversimplifies and most Latinos have the sense to know that the GOP is never on our side and exploits us to further a very racist agenda. As for those in New Mexico who had the sanity lapse to elect a female, Hispanic Republican, they can just look next door at Arizona to see what the GOP thinks of Hispanics.

November 05 2010 at 11:13 PM Report abuse -22 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to pudgeuncle's comment
Stephanie

Your statement is so untrue abot the Republicans, sounds like you are sterotyping. GOP Gov. Jan Brewer just took up where ex-GOV, DEMOCRAT Janet Napolitano stand on Immigration: As governor, Napolitano was outspoken about "the Federal government's failure to fulfill its responsibilities in securing our border and providing for a realistic and functional immigration policy." To combat illegal immigration, the governor opted to: crackdown on employers who hire undocumented workers; catch forgers of I.D. documents; push for more Homeland Security measures to deter border crossings.

November 06 2010 at 7:44 AM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
lesley

Maybe its time to quit stereotyping all Latino's as poor and ignorant and dependent upon unions,special interests and government grants for their education and handouts. THats what makes the difference between many of the foreign born that voted for REID, and the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc generation Hispanics, who may or may not speak spanish, but are proud and think of themselves as AMERICANS First. In New Mexico, they even THINK for themselves and must have split their votes between Martinez for Governor, and for the anglo Democrat Heinrich incumbant that ran aganst a very popular Hispanic, in his district. The one size fits all mentality of the two parties, is going to be their downfall. The immigrants and Latino's in the unions and working in Vegas would have been a real big boost to REID, where the historic or 2nd generation American Hispanic or Latino, is a very small minority. Personally, besides all of the above candidates standing for traditional conservative values (including enforcement of existing immigration law and respect for law), I think they all were as articulate, convincing, qualified and earnest in wanting to preserve or restore sanity, as any politician I have witnessed in many long years. Maybe just growing up in America, with hard working, non government handout parents, makes all the difference in ones priorities. Regardless of ones race, sex or ethnicity, and the media show start doing away with stereotypical qualifiers and identifiers when writng, discussing and labeling anyone who isnt anglo. Now that would be progress. Go Martinez,Sandoval and Rubio! Good Job, well done and Good Luck!

November 05 2010 at 11:03 PM Report abuse +14 rate up rate down Reply
RSK1177

Latinos should get involve in the political process. Those who ran under the Republican banner are independent thinkers and self-achievers. Latinos should realize that the Democrat party has done little for them and just rely on them for their votes. Calling Marco Rubio "the Cuban Obama" is an insult to Rubio. Mr. Rubio has worked hard to get where he is. He hasn't been the recipient of hand-outs as Obama or the alias he used has. Rubio has conservative principles and is not an ideologue. Other Latinos should be proud of Mr. Rubio.

November 05 2010 at 9:59 PM Report abuse +15 rate up rate down Reply
kattcandotoo

Unions may not be perfect but if we go back to pre union days we will be all working in sweat shops with no rights as an employee. Unions helped the workers. I don't want to return to minimum wage jobs. the problem is America looks good to immigrants because of the fiber and value system, if we lose our rights we become another third world country. It's greed on the part of business to make more and more that takes our jobs out of country, not the unions. The unions are being scapgoated. If we start settling for mediocre then we become what all comes here for

November 05 2010 at 7:07 PM Report abuse -6 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to kattcandotoo's comment
lesley

Kattcandotoo, your right about the history of the unions, but if they are so aganst sending jobs out of the country, why do they keep supporting Democrats? Why do they support candidates who support Environmentalists and REgulations that for the one world order, make jobs and business so unattractive and expensive here, that survival and growth and entrapenuership is only possible in those same 3rd world countries? In 1960, we were the only country in the world that was totally self supporting in food, manufacturing, steel, natural resources etc, except for 13% of oil that was shipped in from Saudi, due to a 1930's agreement. Think about it! We even shipped wheat and food to Russia. What changed? Werent unions and profit motive present during all the years prior to VIet Nam? Why do union members still give their money to so called leaders who take with one hand and give it away to non union, non tax payer, non work ethnic citizens and non citizens, while transferring your jobs, knowledge, science and secrets to countries who don't even like us???? Unions had to fight for the secret ballot also years ago. But does that mean you should give away your right to secret vote, for card check? Whats the motive of your leaders in that? Its the individual and your work ethic that is still the most important character left to whats left of the Union membership. Our Country and early politicians and elected leaders did alot for us also in our history, but like union leaders, the motives change and the leaders are educated differently. Priorities change for those making laws and shipping jobs over seas. We don't have to assume the motive is the same or bow down to this seasons crop, just because last years was great. Unfortunately, education and law and opportunity have been manipulated right out of America in the last 40 years, and many Americans just havent seen it happening. Many people don't even know or realize the history and Ideology that has always been in back of the Union movement, even though most people just look to them as increasing wages and benefits. But, look deeper and look at the big picture history, and you will see that ideology much more sinister and life changing than mere "help the poor worker" talking point.

November 05 2010 at 11:37 PM Report abuse +6 rate up rate down Reply
dc walker

Wonderful. Latinos on the border were always hard working and had businesses. Its only natural they vote conservative.

November 05 2010 at 3:17 PM Report abuse +10 rate up rate down Reply

FEATURED VIDEO

View All »

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video »

Follow Politics Daily


Politics Home Page : Roll Call