AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!Good article, but just wanted to correct one mistatement that was made. You mention RU-486 as the "morning after" pill; however, the two are actually different drugs entirely. RU-486 is an abortion pill (also known as mifepristone). RU-486, when given after a pregnancy has started, stops the development of a pregnancy (which happens once a fertilized egg implants in the uterus). The "morning after" pill (emergency contraception, sold as Plan B One-Step, Plan B, Next Choice, or ella), on the other hand, prevent pregnancy by delaying or inhibiting ovulation; they do not cause an abortion.
November 08 2010 at 1:01 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyDid you ever stop to think about what they call abortion clinics. Planned Parenthood. It would be more accurate to call it unplanned Parenthood. I believe in a womans right to choose...but that time to make the choice is before she lays with a man. After that, she must live with her choice. Don't give that crap about what if she is raped or incest. Thats probally 1 in 1 million, and I doubt that.
November 06 2010 at 9:00 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyFirstly, it's not murder. And secondly, why should a woman be forced to carry a child so that it can be given up for adoption? It's still HER body and she should have the choice of whether or not she wants to carry a child.
November 10 2010 at 9:35 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyOne word: adoption. There are many families that cannot have children, and try for years to have children, yet here we are murdering the very children that could be a saving grace for another couple.
November 06 2010 at 12:49 AM Report abuse Permalink -2 rate up rate down Replyi guess if you consider abortion nothing more than a medical procedure tweeting #ihadanabortion makes about as much sense as tweeting #ihadacolonoscopy. and isn't that pretty much the argument? that abortion is a legal medical procedure? if that's all it is then there really wouldn't be a need for folks to be tweeting about it, would there?
November 05 2010 at 11:25 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Reply"only bad girls need abortions" - where has that ever been stated? It's easy to make a case for something when you use slanted language; and use examples which never happened.
November 05 2010 at 10:54 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Reply"anti-choice people that women who have had abortions are not a few isolated individuals who are ripe to be bullied." Again with the fake drama. Hasn't happened. Pretty much a very slanted article, with the term 'anti-choice' nbeing used against the accepted term 'pro-life'. You know, the people who never got a chance to live and grow up becuase they were aborted - they aren't around to twitter.
November 05 2010 at 10:52 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down ReplyYes, it has happened. When you "protest" outside of abortion clinics, you are trying to coerce women not to receive the care that they want. You are not coming to them with a rational appeal, you are coming to them with an appeal to emotion - without logic. Anti-choice protesters are NOT pro-life. They are against a woman's right to choose, against her living her life and once her child comes out of the womb, they couldn't care less about it.
November 10 2010 at 9:40 AM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Reply"Sex education pioneer Margaret Sanger risked jail time to get her word out." Good to bring out the example of Frau Sanger, who expressed her desire to promote abortions among negroes and undesirables as a way to purify the gene pool. There's the beginning of your contraceptive rights movement. Google it for the full story.
November 05 2010 at 10:49 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down Replyare you opposed to birth control because Margaret Sanger was racist? or are you trying to impose your morality (against birth control?) on everyone else in the country?
November 06 2010 at 12:13 AM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down Reply"But then that's why it has to be done. Because there are nuts out there with guns and they need to know that they can't shoot everyone." No one has ever been targeted for ANYTHING due ot having had an abortion. No one killed. No one even shamed, as far as I know. If they had been, it would be all over the news. Stop being dramatic. Tiller's case was clearly quite different from that of a woman who had merely consented to have her fetus aborted.
November 05 2010 at 10:47 PM Report abuse Permalink -3 rate up rate down Reply"t-shirt campaign that goes back six years" - How about this one- "My mommy got an abortion, and all I got was this lousy T-shirt. Which I can't wear. Because I'm dead."
November 05 2010 at 10:40 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners




Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
12 Comments