Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Charlie Rangel Found Guilty on 11 Counts of Ethics Violations

1 year ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
A House ethics subcommittee has found Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) guilty on 11 counts of violating House rules "by clear and convincing evidence," Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), the chair of the House ethics committee, announced Tuesday.

Rangel was found guilty of breaking House rules related to reporting rental income from his villa in the Dominican Republic, of using a rent-controlled apartment in New York for campaign activities, and rules against using congressional stationery to raise funds for a center at New York's City University to be built in his name.

After receiving news of the verdict, Rangel blasted the the findings "unfair" and "unfortunate."

"How can anyone have confidence in the decision of the Ethics Subcommittee when I was deprived of due process rights, right to counsel and was not even in the room?" he said. "I can only hope that the full Committee will treat me more fairly, and take into account my entire 40 years of service to the Congress before making any decisions on sanctions."

But Lofgren stood by her committee's verdict and the process they used to come to it. "This has been a difficult assignment, time-consuming and we have approached our duties diligently -- and that includes every member of this subcommittee," Lofgren said. "We have tried to act with fairness, led only by the facts and the law, and I believe that we have accomplished that mission."

The top Republican on the subcommittee, Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Tex.), endorsed the committee's findings, but said the Rangel matter has broader implications for the entire House. "I'm hopeful as we move forward with this matter into the next phase, that at the end of the day we will be able to begin an era of transparency and accountability, a new era of ethics that will restore the credibility of this House," he said.

Rangel faced charges stemming from a 21-month investigation into accusations that he failed to pay rent-related taxes on his villa in the Dominican Republic; that he used a rent-controlled apartment in New York for campaign activities; and that he used congressional stationary to raise funds for a center at New York's City University to be built in his name.

The trial began Monday, more than two years after the congressman asked the Ethic Committee to investigate him following media reports about irregularities in his tax filings and personal financial disclosure reports to the House.

Although the congressman insisted he never knowingly violated House rules, he stepped down from his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee earlier this year under pressure from fellow Democrats. After that, he defiantly kept a high profile on Capitol Hill and in his Harlem district, maintaining his innocence at every opportunity. He was re-elected to a 21st term on Nov. 2.

In an extraordinary speech on the House floor in August, Rangel held forth for more than half an hour to defend himself before going home to New York to campaign for re-election. He said then that there was "not one scintilla of evidence" to prove him guilty of the violations and demanded that the ethics committee publicly try him so he could answer the allegations.

But when the eight-member House panel began the hearing Monday, Rangel walked out of the proceedings, deeming them unfair and a violation of due process since he had no legal team representing him. Rangel explained that he had spent nearly $2 million in legal fees in the run-up to the trial and asked the committee to delay his hearing until he could find and raise more money to pay for more lawyers. The committee said no.

"The committee has deprived me of the fundamental right to counsel and has chosen to proceed as if it is fair and impartial and operating according to rules, when in reality they are depriving me of my rights," Rangel said in a statement after leaving the hearing.

Despite Rangel's absence, the committee's staff attorneys continued with their case against him, making an early motion to end the hearing with no further witnesses or evidence against Rangel. The committee granted that judgment and then went into closed executive session to debate each count against the congressman.

Now that Rangel has been found guilty, the full committee will meet to make a recommendation to the full House about punishment, which could range from reprimand to censure to expulsion.

Additional reporting by Kevin Brennan for Politics Daily.

Follow Patricia Murphy on Twitter @1PatriciaMurphy.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Comments

34 Comments

Filter by:
Comments are no longer accepted for this topic.
hansom Bill

There is only one thing the house can do on this mater. That is to give him his walking papers. The creep has been around long enough to know what he was doing was wrong. His story that he didn't know is false. A slap on the hands will not be good enough for him. Out the door. The people of new york don't need such.

November 16 2010 at 1:28 PM
madsarro

the really sad part is that rangel did or does nothing any different than any other long termer, dem or republican. i'm glad he walked out, saves a lot of time, tax payer money, and diversion from the real issue of righting america from its hard left turn.

November 16 2010 at 1:26 PM
Norma

Now, if they have found him guilty on 11 of the 13 counts, then he should be punished in the same way any other American would be punished. Just saying that he didn't know that he was commiting a crime, does not hold to the smell test. Charlie Rangel knew exactly what he was doing, and because he thinks himself above others, he thought he could get away with it, as usual. Until politicians feet are held to the same fire as any other citizen, we will never be truly free in this country. The fact that Charlie Rangel has a legal background, should negate his feet being held even closer to the fire.

November 16 2010 at 1:26 PM
Mike

We need term limits and we need them NOW. Posting it here on a board isn't going to change things. Writing your elected representatives and senators is the only way we're going to be heard. There is no reason why we cap the Prez at two 4-year terms, but reps and senators can serve indefinitely. Some will say, "but what happens when you get a good one"? Well, I submit for one that that doesn't happen often (look at Congressional approval ratings) and two, the Framers didn't intend for us to have career politicians. It just turns out they were a little short-sighted on this. Reps get 2 years, Senators 6 years. I submit 2 terms for Senator max and 6 terms Representatives max. This will stop or at least curtail a lot of the corruption. You can't tell me that once these people get embedded, they don't start lining their pockets and doing things they shouldn't. I agree with some who say here that ethics violations get you booted. No exceptions.

November 16 2010 at 1:24 PM
zpainter

Too bad Charlie, You started out with good intentions. Power set in, and in that fog of power, you thought you were untouchable.....above it all......

November 16 2010 at 1:23 PM +1
Nayanda

This has been a long time coming and I believe, like the House ethics subcommittee, Mr. Rangel knowingly committed these violations. To be elected 20+ terms and not know the protocol for ethical behavior is unfathomable. His outburst on the floor was embarrassing. His departure afterwards even more so. I live in Harlem now and I chose not to vote for him this election. I was dismayed to see I was one of the minority. Harlem has needed new blood for a long time. Maybe now we will have an opportunity to hear the new voices coming forth in our community.

November 16 2010 at 1:16 PM +21
natezim

Finally we have a verdict of guilty. This is not enough! This representative of the people has disgraced the name of Congress, for the People, Of the People and By the People. He has lied, manipulated and subverted everything to his greedy pursuasion. He should now be expelled! and criminally charged for his role in conspiring to secure tax regulation in favor for his donors. This should be a mandate by the people, for the people and of the people that trusted in his congressional leadership he so maligned!!!

November 16 2010 at 1:13 PM +22
Kenneth

This man was tried and found guilty on 11 counts. They should send him packing as his punishment. It is time to drain the swamp of these illegal activities. This man should be made an example to others. If we on the outside had been found guilty of even half the crimes we would be looking at serious jail time. It is time to make those that we elect to represent us live by the same standard as the people they represent.

November 16 2010 at 1:12 PM +23
ettu

"Although the congressman insisted he never knowingly violated House rules,"............seems our "public officials" are not only negligent by NOT READING the bills they pass, but they apparently DO NOT READ ANYTHING. How can you be a member of that Body for the number of years Rangel has been around, and not know the "rules?" Guess we will find out if Congress is ready to mete out justice to one of their own. About time they start.

November 16 2010 at 1:03 PM +18
ravatar252

This is a very good case for term limits.No more professional politicians, no more huge pensions, no more special treatment, or excluding themselves from the laws they pass. The job in the Senate, or Congress is one of service to ones' people, and country. Not a license to milk the system, or build a dynasty.

November 16 2010 at 12:52 PM +62

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>

News From Our Partners