AOL News has a new home! The Huffington Post.
Click here to visit the new home of Politics Daily!
Pew said that in its final pre-election poll, the landline-only sample of likely voters put the Republicans ahead on the generic congressional ballot by 51 percent to 39 percent, but that lead fell to 48 percent to 42 percent when cell phone users were included in the sample. While the official figures are not yet final, the Republican margin in the national House vote ended up being about 7 points.I have been saying this for the last 5 years. The voters who elected President Obama by a vast majority have cellphones NOT landlines. Landlines are the phone of choice for seniors who are the Republican party base. Yes yes I know, you seniors have cells too. You're the ones running around with a Bluetooth headset hanging off your head thinking "I'm Sooo important."
December 01 2010 at 12:53 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyOh, not to worry, that's just us old folks who see no need to spend what little money we have left, after the Obama debacle, on being hooked up to the rest of the world with every device available on the market. Just call us silly, but really, do you want someone to be able to disrupt your day, every minute of the day? Try some downtime, it is refreshing.
November 22 2010 at 5:33 PM Report abuse Permalink +7 rate up rate down ReplyThis is disturbingly true. Most of the polls during the last election cycle were reported as they were all equal. If you searched hard enough you could find out which methods they used. But that was not reported along with the highlights. And guess who reads the headlines: eyery reader; and who reads the details and follow-up to understand the methods maybe 2%. Think how the headlines from these polls affected everyone's perception and how misleading they were. I know this past election was one-sided so it was easy to predict winners except in the close ones. They were off consistently on the close ones because of the poor methodology. And that includes their definition of a likely voter. I am coming to the conclusion that pollsters and politicians want the public to be unknowledgable about how polls work or they fear we'll see the Wizard behind the durtain. BTW, I have to exclude the Gallup poll from this because they finally came around to making it public that they were calling cell phones also.
November 22 2010 at 4:13 PM Report abuse Permalink +5 rate up rate down ReplyGuess that proves that Republicans are more frugal than Democrats.
November 22 2010 at 2:54 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyIt really has nothing to do with being frugal. It is more personal preference. I only carry a cell phone so my family can reach me when I am away from the home or for emergency reasons. I do not give the number out to everyone. Their could be days before my cell rings or I use it. I give out the house land line for personal and business calls. If I am not their the answering machine does a great job. I see many people can not live without their cell phones. I actually watch people when they get in their car search for someone to talk to while they are driving. I do not talk while driving. I will check to see who is calling and if I feel it is important enough I will pull off the road and call the person back.
November 22 2010 at 7:39 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyNot really Punnster. 85% of our national debt was run up by Republican presidents until the bailout when it fell to 75%. Republicans are only fiscal conservatives when the money will go to helping the American people. Give them a chance to help the wealthy and Katey bar the door!
December 01 2010 at 1:11 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyMakes sense to me. The use of the landline is now based on a flat rate. Most plans don't charge for long distance or calls out of the local area anymore. I'm sure Democrats that use cell phones aren't caring whether or not they go over their minutes each month. Who cares? It's not their money, right?
November 22 2010 at 2:18 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyWhose money would you think it was? And why wouldn't it be their money, the only folks I know around here who work on a regular basis are Democrats, there are a lot of Republican/TeaPartier executives, but no workers.
November 22 2010 at 5:20 PM Report abuse Permalink -1 rate up rate down ReplyIt is you who make no sense. Its not Democratic States that are the Welfare Queens of the union. For every dollar paid in taxes, California a Democratic state gets back 78 cents. The Republican state of Alaska, in spite of all Palin's screaming about oil independance, receives $1.83 in Welfare & entitlements for its dollar paid in taxes. Don't believe me, do your own research on this non-partisan site. http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/show/22685.html
December 01 2010 at 1:04 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replydoes this surprise anyone? really? republicans, are by nature mostly conservative. and the dictionary definition of conservative is: •resistant to change •having social or political views favoring conservatism •cautious: avoiding excess; "a conservative estimate" •a person who is reluctant to accept changes and new ideas •button-down: unimaginatively conventional; •bourgeois: conforming to the standards and conventions of the middle class; whereas democrats who are often derided as 'liberal' which has this dictionary definiton... •broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; •having political or social views favoring reform and progress •tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition •a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties •a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets I don't have to make this up...just put definition of: into google and this is what you get. ironic tho is the definition for liberal as "•a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets" since they're always being attacked for wanting big government and having too much of a hand in regulating business... and equally ironic is the definition of conservative including "conforming to the standards and conventions of the middle class;" when they're always perceived as being for the rich.... it makes me think that we fling these words around too blithely with our own personal definitions instead of what's true...and thereby have no frickin clue how to understand each other.
November 22 2010 at 2:15 PM Report abuse Permalink +8 rate up rate down ReplyNot only that, but in spite of the massive failure of their policies in the last decade, Republicans still want to give it all to the top 2% & hang America out to dry! When the middle class is strong, big business booms. And their stance as fiscal conservatives? 85% of the national debt was run up under Republican presidents until the bailout. Now its 75%.
December 01 2010 at 1:07 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyFollow Politics Daily
POPULAR
News From Our Partners



Top News
More News
More on Aol
Local News
More Blog/Sites
Sites and Services
7 Comments