Hot on HuffPost:

See More Stories

Unemployment Benefits Expire Tuesday Unless Congress Acts

2 years ago
  0 Comments Say Something  »
Text Size
As Democrats and Republicans struggle to agree on which bills to pass in Congress' crowded lame-duck session, hundreds of thousands of unemployed workers may find themselves struggling just to make ends meet.

That's because Congress has not passed an extension for long-term unemployment benefits, the payments the federal government sends to laid-off workers who have exhausted the traditional 26 weeks of assistance administered by states. Although Congress traditionally approves federal long-term assistance during times of high unemployment, Senate Republicans have blocked several attempts throughout the year to extend benefits in an effort to prevent Democrats from paying for the benefits with deficit spending.

On Monday night, Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) introduced a bill to extend long-term benefits through the end of 2011 at a cost of $56 billion, which would not be offset by other spending cuts. Congress has extended unemployment benefits eight times since the economic downturn began, with the last extension in July. The current unemployment rate is 9.6 percent.

The length of available benefits differs by state, but is usually based on the unemployment rate, with people in the hardest-hit areas eligible for up to 99 weeks of benefits. The extension now being proposed by Democrats would apply to people out of work more than 26 weeks, but fewer than 99. If Congress fails to act, all federal benefits extensions will expire Tuesday, leaving 800,000 Americans without assistance by next week and nearly 2 million without benefits by January.

On Sunday, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, suggested that Democrats would try to wrap an extension of unemployment benefits into any discussion of extending the expiring Bush tax cuts. "We should not be worrying about the discomfort of the wealthy, but the fact that there are many people struggling to survive everyday now because they have no job and no means to keep their family together in very difficult times," Durbin said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

But Durbin's new Senate colleague, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) indicated Monday that Republicans have not changed their minds in wanting to see the benefits paid for before letting them get through the Senate. "You could extend it if you found a way to pay for it," Kirk told Fox News. "And I voted for that in the past but these proposals to extend unemployment insurance by just adding it to the deficit are misguided."

A Senate aide with knowledge of the negotiations told Politics Daily that congressional leaders are working to negotiate an agreement now and could have a proposal ready for consideration later this week.

Our New Approach to Comments

In an effort to encourage the same level of civil dialogue among Politics Daily’s readers that we expect of our writers – a “civilogue,” to use the term coined by PD’s Jeffrey Weiss – we are requiring commenters to use their AOL or AIM screen names to submit a comment, and we are reading all comments before publishing them. Personal attacks (on writers, other readers, Nancy Pelosi, George W. Bush, or anyone at all) and comments that are not productive additions to the conversation will not be published, period, to make room for a discussion among those with ideas to kick around. Please read our Help and Feedback section for more info.

Comments

111 Comments

Filter by:
Comments are no longer accepted for this topic.
swgoddess01

When my husband lost a job, it took him two weeks, TWO WEEKS, to find another job. So what if it paid less?? It's called LIFESTYLE CHANGE. Move in to an apartment or move in with family. It is not the end of the world if you have to go out and get a job that pays less than what you can afford to make right now. Get TWO jobs, get THREE jobs. Get rid of your new cars with high monthly payments, sell your house, cut your losses, and move on. If you are alive and well, you can adjust. This false sense of entitlement needs to stop NOW before our children and grandchildren end up paying for our laziness and inability to change and adjust. Sheesh.

November 30 2010 at 1:08 PM
justm1252

People have to learn that elections have consequences. It was the heartland of the country that turned a deaf ear to Obama and the Democrats. Let them get a taste of Republican leadership early!

November 30 2010 at 1:04 PM
Chuck

No one would deprive a business of a fair profit, but rampant corporate greed, fueled by Republican (and some Democrat) members of Congress has sent hundreds of thousands of jobs overseas. Corporate greed hsa made millionaires of many execs, who now enjoy paying little or no taxes, either personally or corporately. The obscene financial practices put in place by donor-seeking polititions has just been approved by the voters by keeping these hypocrites in Congress. Memo to Americans: Voting, or lack of voting has allowed this to happen. It didn't have to be this way.

November 30 2010 at 1:04 PM
Cool Hand Luke

I feel for these people, I really do, but I am self employed and I recieve NONE of these benefits. I wish I had 99 weeks to back my bill and feed my family.

November 30 2010 at 1:01 PM
atouchofirish

On Sunday, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), the second-ranking Democrat in the Senate, suggested that Democrats would try to wrap an extension of unemployment benefits into any discussion of extending the expiring Bush tax cuts. "We should not be worrying about the discomfort of the wealthy, but the fact that there are many people struggling to survive everyday now because they have no job and no means to keep their family together in very difficult times," Don't worry about the comfort of the wealthy? Yeah, right. We'll just see in the next month or so - unemployment extension will be stopped and tax cuts for the wealthy will continue. Obama's already buckled his knees on his stance of "no more tax cuts for the wealthy." We've got a Republican stronghold once again - of course, they'll worry about their comfort - it brings them a reelection! Feel we're in a Democracy yet?

November 30 2010 at 12:58 PM
carl lazar

Instead of having call centers in the phillipines and india train our unemployed here to answer the phones. Keeping theses people on unemployment checks for two year is a disgrace. There are plenty of paying jobs around but you are spoiling these people, it is a great deal not having to pay taxes or anything else, just get a gross check and sit back.

November 30 2010 at 12:57 PM
linmarco

A man alone and without a job will go hungry and do the best he can under the circumstances he faces. A man with a family takes a different view. He is willing to go hungry but he isn't willing to watch his children go hungry. He becomes clear headed in finding a way to feed them and he has a long memory of those who stood in his way when he tried to help himself.

November 30 2010 at 12:56 PM
yesitdonna

How about pulling troops out of other countries that we pay BILLIONS of dollars for in "peace keeping". How about letting OUR citizens try and live. It's hard enough for people to try and live on Unemployment let alone none!! The fact that they TAX unemployment is rediculous as well. How about letting the umemployed take money out of their IRA's and 401K without penalties... it's THEIR MONEY! I can see taxing it but penalties? Rediculous

November 30 2010 at 12:55 PM
veasystreet

Let's get people back to work. Let's stop spending FEDERAL money to support state unemployment. As long as we keep giving money to the LONG-TERM unemployed, they will continue to collect our tax money. There are state and local welfare programs to help the long term unemployed. By spending Federal money on unemployment you are allowing state and local governments to waste money on programs that should be spent on the unemployed. This allows more spending on pet projects that are not needed and which money could be better spent on the chronic unemployed who desperately need the support.

November 30 2010 at 12:50 PM
bfairbob

Congress can give 700 billion to the banks, but it cant give 56 billion to the citizens? I can see many think there is some abuse, as with all government handouts, but there are many is hard hit states that cant get a job --- BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE. I dont think its fair that a persons job left for mexico and they where making $15 per hour, to take a job at McDees for $7 bucks an hour and try to have the same living...The only way we are going to bring jobs back is by stopping the ships coming in from china. Start making tv's, radios, cell phones, computers, games, etc.etc.etc.etc. in the states.

November 30 2010 at 12:46 PM

Follow Politics Daily

  • Comics
robert-and-donna-trussell
CHAOS THEORY
Featuring political comics by Robert and Donna TrussellMore>>
  • Woman UP Video
politics daily videos
Weekly Videos
Woman Up, Politics Daily's Online Sunday ShowMore»
politics daily videos
TV Appearances
Showcasing appearances by Politics Daily staff and contributors.More>>